USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker Forum
- smokeylarue

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
I've accepted admission to USC but heavily debating withdrawing that acceptance because my June LSAT retake was higher and probably can get me into some T14 schools if I apply again in the fall. My goal is big law, don't care about location too much. I'm leaning towards withdrawing right now, am I making the right decision?
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
If you want biglaw and your new score has you in the running for T14s then yes you are making the right decision.
- Cade McNown

- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
Yes. At the very least a better lsat would improve scholly offers from texas/vandy/ucla/usc. How big of a score improvement did you make?
- smokeylarue

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
167 to 172, GPA is 3.68
- glewz

- Posts: 781
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
yeah, you should probably withdraw
- Cade McNown

- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
yeah, the difference is night and day. I'd reapply from CCN on down to USC, and you should get several t-14 acceptances and scholarship offers.
edit for clarity.
edit for clarity.
- ahduth

- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
Or at least get $150k from USC.Cade McNown wrote:yeah, the difference is night and day. I'd reapply from CCN on down to USC, and you should get several t-14 acceptances and scholarship offers.
edit for clarity.
-
fingersxd

- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
Absolutely reapply. CCN is unlikely, but everything on down is in play, as is additional $
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11465
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
You're in a different league now.
- unc0mm0n1

- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:06 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
Why would a 172 3.7 be unlikely at NYU? They didn't reject a single applicant on LSN with those numbers ( a few waitlists) but they accpeted people with lower GPA's and the same LSAT. I think the OP has a very reasonable shot at CCN.fingersxd wrote:Absolutely reapply. CCN is unlikely, but everything on down is in play, as is additional $
-
fingersxd

- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
I probably overstated the point. Unlikely might be a bit harsh and you are correct that CCN is a reasonable possibility. That said, NYU's medians are 3.78/171 but as regards LSAT scores they specifically state that they look at the average. If this is in fact the case, OP would be viewed as 3.68/170(rounding up), in which case s/he is below both medians making acceptance questionable unless OP had URM, work experience or something similar setting OP apart.unc0mm0n1 wrote:Why would a 172 3.7 be unlikely at NYU? They didn't reject a single applicant on LSN with those numbers ( a few waitlists) but they accpeted people with lower GPA's and the same LSAT. I think the OP has a very reasonable shot at CCN.fingersxd wrote:Absolutely reapply. CCN is unlikely, but everything on down is in play, as is additional $
Also, as a general matter, LSN is useful, but it's far from the totality of applicants to a school like NYU so they may well have rejected people with those numbers and we just don't know it. More to the point, we know little about the type of applicants you reference (i.e. was their LSAT a one time score? are they URM? do they have particularly impressive softs?) ... I'll just say that looking at a handful of applicants with a 172 and lower GPAs that were accepted, ALL of them fell into one or more of these 'bonus' categories. OP may as well, but we don't know, so I think it's better to be conservative when providing advice.
- ahduth

- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
No. The OP has the opportunity to jump from USC to the T6. Jobs out of USC aren't quite as easy to come by as out of NYU. The "conservative" advice is to not spend money now, and try to get into a top tier school later.fingersxd wrote:OP may as well, but we don't know, so I think it's better to be conservative when providing advice.
-
fingersxd

- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
My earlier post specifically said that OP should reapply. I only said that we should be conservative in response to ppl pushing the t6 as a higher likelihood than it is. one of mpvd is pretty certain so reapplying is obviously tcr here.ahduth wrote:No. The OP has the opportunity to jump from USC to the T6. Jobs out of USC aren't quite as easy to come by as out of NYU. The "conservative" advice is to not spend money now, and try to get into a top tier school later.fingersxd wrote:OP may as well, but we don't know, so I think it's better to be conservative when providing advice.
-
071816

- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
OP, you should definitely reapply.
-
Total Litigator

- Posts: 694
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:17 pm
Re: USC 15k/yr vs. Bottom half T-14 @ sticker
Definitely reapply. If you can do something interesting in the mean time, it will help your application even more. If not, than no big deal. I am jealous of your position.