BC v. UCLA Forum
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
BC v. UCLA
Full price.
Love both Boston and LA
wouldnt mind NYC either.
Want to try to make $ - so big law or big paying law employment is what I looking for. Or Clerkship or Academia....
Thoughts?
Fams in New England
GF New England
Group of Friends in LA - got my masters there and worked out that a way for a while.
Tough call. Anyone have any insight?
Love both Boston and LA
wouldnt mind NYC either.
Want to try to make $ - so big law or big paying law employment is what I looking for. Or Clerkship or Academia....
Thoughts?
Fams in New England
GF New England
Group of Friends in LA - got my masters there and worked out that a way for a while.
Tough call. Anyone have any insight?
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:35 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Well I would imagine BC would be better for NYC plus California job market is in the toilet...is there any $$ involved with this decision?
- NYCbound35
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:48 am
Re: BC v. UCLA
This decision is almost entirely where you'd rather practice.
If you don't want to make that decision now, it'll probably be easier to take a UCLA degree east than to take a BC degree west...plus it would be a more enjoyable 3 years in sunny California...so I'd go UCLA.
If you don't want to make that decision now, it'll probably be easier to take a UCLA degree east than to take a BC degree west...plus it would be a more enjoyable 3 years in sunny California...so I'd go UCLA.
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
NYCbound35 wrote:This decision is almost entirely where you'd rather practice.
If you don't want to make that decision now, it'll probably be easier to take a UCLA degree east than to take a BC degree west...plus it would be a more enjoyable 3 years in sunny California...so I'd go UCLA.
tru I have no real preference I guess. Just would rather go where there are more jobs - so whatever markets are rebounding/not sucking as much
Boston v. LA - which legal market does more hiring for SA programs?
What about if you factor in NYC and BC's placement there?
How badly is the CA market in the gutter? any links?
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
BC- feeds into two pretty good markets
UCLA- feeds into a shitty market
Choice = BC
UCLA- feeds into a shitty market
Choice = BC
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: BC v. UCLA
ndirish2010 wrote:BC- feeds into two pretty good markets
UCLA- feeds into a shitty market
Choice = BC
UCLA- better school.
California-nice weather
Markets-UCLA placed more in biglaw (35%) than BC (33%) last year, so I really don't see how your good v. crappy market analysis is relevant.
Choice= def not necessarily BC.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
You should probably retake if this is what you want rather than take one of these schools at sticker.Headybrah wrote:Want to try to make $ - so big law or big paying law employment is what I looking for. Or Clerkship or Academia....
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Lawquacious wrote:ndirish2010 wrote:BC- feeds into two pretty good markets
UCLA- feeds into a shitty market
Choice = BC
UCLA- better school.
California-nice weather
Markets-UCLA placed more in biglaw (35%) than BC (33%) last year, so I really don't see how your good v. crappy market analysis is relevant.
Choice= def not necessarily
C.
Not retaking. Maxed out my score. Thanks for answering my question with TLS canned answers. Appreciate it.
Still torn, not sure how I can turn ucla down. Everyone says LA is not good market, can you elaborate? It is second biggest city in country and best school in that city that has to count for something.
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
This.NYCbound35 wrote:This decision is almost entirely where you'd rather practice.
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Id rather be where there are more jobs?
I know i figured placement would be the best answer....
What about logic that UCLA plays better on East coast than BC plays on West coast?
sillly argument?
I know i figured placement would be the best answer....
What about logic that UCLA plays better on East coast than BC plays on West coast?
sillly argument?
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
That argument is moot unless you really have no idea where you want to practice. Also, consider the implications of being 3 timezones away from the SO. If you go to UCLA you'll have to be okay with the strong likelihood of ending the relationship in short order.Headybrah wrote:Id rather be where there are more jobs?
I know i figured placement would be the best answer....
What about logic that UCLA plays better on East coast than BC plays on West coast?
sillly argument?
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
These schools have almost identical biglaw placement stats, with BC placing better in the northeast (NY, Boston) and UCLA placing better in California (LA, San Diego).
Decide where you want to live and work after law school, and make your decision accordingly.
Both are great schools.
Decide where you want to live and work after law school, and make your decision accordingly.
Both are great schools.
- loblaw
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:27 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Have you tried to ask for money from BC?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
They should be able to cough some up. Plus BC is a good deal cheaper than UCLA from what I recall (even if you are in-state and I'm assuming you're not).loblaw wrote:Have you tried to ask for money from BC?
Seems to be that number of opportunities in Boston/NY (BC) vs. LA (UCLA) is pretty different so if you are 'following the jobs' I'd say BC is the place to go.
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Just to spice it up, throw bu in the mix now!
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
Congrats!
That said, BU=BC more or less in terms of job opportunities so if you were leanign towards BC then you should now just pick whichever school you would rather spend 3 years at. They are pretty different.
That said, BU=BC more or less in terms of job opportunities so if you were leanign towards BC then you should now just pick whichever school you would rather spend 3 years at. They are pretty different.
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: BC v. UCLA
BU doesn't really change anything.
If you want Cali, go to UCLA.
If you want the northeast, go to BC.
Given that BC places better in biglaw and in clerkships, I don't see BU really changing the dynamic. If BU offers you more money, take BU over BC, because the stats show BC only marginally outperforms BU (BC only places around ten or more students a year in biglaw compared to BU, or something to that effect. Too lazy to do the actual math.).
So really:
If you want Cali, go to UCLA.
If you want the northeast, go to Boston and decide between BC or BU.
If you want Cali, go to UCLA.
If you want the northeast, go to BC.
Given that BC places better in biglaw and in clerkships, I don't see BU really changing the dynamic. If BU offers you more money, take BU over BC, because the stats show BC only marginally outperforms BU (BC only places around ten or more students a year in biglaw compared to BU, or something to that effect. Too lazy to do the actual math.).
So really:
If you want Cali, go to UCLA.
If you want the northeast, go to Boston and decide between BC or BU.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login