BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL) Forum
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:40 pm
BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
What to do? I'm living in California right now and originally from the East Coast. Would love to work in LA but that's secondary to getting the best education possible and a good job. NY, LA, SF, DC, Chicago. Want big law for a few years, and know the NLJ stats for all of the above and that my best shot is BU, but 28k a year to a top 20 school is tempting. Besides these I'm also waiting on Cornell and got in at UWashington (because I like seattle) but I can't see myself going there. Also my waitlist list reads like this:
Northwestern (Hold)
GULC (Special Preferred)
Penn
Michigan
UVA
Duke (Not Priority)
Vanderbilt
UCLA
USC
I assume these would all be at sticker...
Northwestern (Hold)
GULC (Special Preferred)
Penn
Michigan
UVA
Duke (Not Priority)
Vanderbilt
UCLA
USC
I assume these would all be at sticker...
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Well if you go to BU, you should know that the vast majority of their biglaw will be in Boston. If that's ok than that would probably be your best shot.
WUSTL gives you a shot at Chicago biglaw if you do well. Besides that neither gives you much chance anywhere else at biglaw.
If retaking isn't an option for you than I'd choose based on the area and how badly you want biglaw. Why do you want it for a few years? Just to pay off debt? If you don't want to do it longterm than maybe just taking less debt is a better option?
WUSTL gives you a shot at Chicago biglaw if you do well. Besides that neither gives you much chance anywhere else at biglaw.
If retaking isn't an option for you than I'd choose based on the area and how badly you want biglaw. Why do you want it for a few years? Just to pay off debt? If you don't want to do it longterm than maybe just taking less debt is a better option?
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
BU blows WUSTL/UCH out of the water in terms of biglaw placement. Don't let the fact that WUSTL is top 20 fool you at all.
Go to BU.
Go to BU.
- Lasers
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
if you are open to boston, BU is the best, imo.
hastings oos is way too expensive, especially if you're not set on CA.
hastings oos is way too expensive, especially if you're not set on CA.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:40 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Haha yeah realize I didn't listen Boston on my list of cities. Pretty big oversight. I would definitely work in Boston as well. I work as an assistant in a big California firm and just in my office alone there are two BU Law grads. I know things have changed but I think that's encouraging in the long run.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Take the money and enjoy STL. Say hi to Nelly and Albert Pujols for me.
- sanetruth
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
I'm assuming you have pretty decent numbers and/or are a splitter who applied late in the cycle? Its strange to get money at the highest ranked school you were accepted to, so I think you'd have a decent chance at getting off a waitlist. unless you applied REALLY late. was that the case?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:40 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
3.47/170. Two years out, good work experience in the legal field. Pretty much the quintessential waitlist candidate at the bottom T14. I applied early to mid-december for all of them except for Georgetown which was a last minute decision and I applied in January.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:40 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Any other thoughts? tips? musings?
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
I think you'll probably get off one of those t-14 waitlists. The odds are just so high that at least one of those will take you with your #'s. Go wherever that is.
- thexfactor
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
wait a year. Then reapply. You will get multiple T14s maybe vandy/usc/ucla/texas with some scholarship money.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
BU for NY/Boston
WUSTL for Chicago
UCH for CA
Tossup between WUSTL or BU for DC (neither good).
If you want just any bigfirm you can take BU.
WUSTL for Chicago
UCH for CA
Tossup between WUSTL or BU for DC (neither good).
If you want just any bigfirm you can take BU.
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
If you can, maybe take one more year off and apply as early as possible. I doubt you won't crack the T14. Especially if you can learn about the particulars of each school in order to write awesome Why essays (and not just particulars you can learn on the web in an hour).
But, hey I'm a 0L, so what do I know.
But, hey I'm a 0L, so what do I know.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nshapkar
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:56 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
sanetruth wrote:I'm assuming you have pretty decent numbers and/or are a splitter who applied late in the cycle? Its strange to get money at the highest ranked school you were accepted to, so I think you'd have a decent chance at getting off a waitlist. unless you applied REALLY late. was that the case?
does applying in december fall as "late in the cycle"?
- sanetruth
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
not generally, but i think for a splitter the difference between applying in sept/october vs. december is huge. and EDing, of course.nshapkar wrote:sanetruth wrote:I'm assuming you have pretty decent numbers and/or are a splitter who applied late in the cycle? Its strange to get money at the highest ranked school you were accepted to, so I think you'd have a decent chance at getting off a waitlist. unless you applied REALLY late. was that the case?
does applying in december fall as "late in the cycle"?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:40 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Yeah I think it's a really big deal. I have a friend who applied in early January with good numbers and got crushed (though I realize a month is a big difference). I've thought about reapplying but the process is really draining and I'm excited for school. Don't think I should put school off or even worse wait a year, reapply and have similar/worse results.
-
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
I'm actually in a very similar situation as you with slightly worse numbers (3.4/169) and a bit worse offers but still $45k difference between BU and WUSTL. Same city prefs, as I'm sure a lot of people have those haha. So I can totally relate to what you're going through.
It seems people are really encouraging reapplying. Does it really make that big of a difference for a splitter to apply early or ED? Is the edge that significant?
It seems people are really encouraging reapplying. Does it really make that big of a difference for a splitter to apply early or ED? Is the edge that significant?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
Wow. Schools are waitlisting like crazy this cycle. I think schools are strategically using the waitlist more than they used to for some reason. Hopefully you will get at least one waitlist break (with so many waitlists I suspect it is likely you'll get a break if you send strong letters of continuing interest to all your waitlist schools). Of your choices now I think I'd take WUSTL, but I would def be pushing to get off your waitlists. The fact you made it onto so many T14 waitlists means you are a competitive applicant; I would really try hard not to settle for less than T14 if I were you.TheMania22 wrote:What to do? I'm living in California right now and originally from the East Coast. Would love to work in LA but that's secondary to getting the best education possible and a good job. NY, LA, SF, DC, Chicago. Want big law for a few years, and know the NLJ stats for all of the above and that my best shot is BU, but 28k a year to a top 20 school is tempting. Besides these I'm also waiting on Cornell and got in at UWashington (because I like seattle) but I can't see myself going there. Also my waitlist list reads like this:
Northwestern (Hold)
GULC (Special Preferred)
Penn
Michigan
UVA
Duke (Not Priority)
Vanderbilt
UCLA
USC
I assume these would all be at sticker...
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: BU$ v. WUSTL$$ v. Hastings (and 9 WL)
NY - Fordham
LA - UCLA/USC
SF - Hastings
DC - GW
Chicago - WUSTL/ND
Boston - BC/BU
Reapply and figure out where you want to work.
LA - UCLA/USC
SF - Hastings
DC - GW
Chicago - WUSTL/ND
Boston - BC/BU
Reapply and figure out where you want to work.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login