Hypothetical Forum
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Hypothetical
I haven't heard from one of the schools here but other than that it seems like a reasonable estimate of what my choices will be.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
What do you think you could get on a retake? Those don't seem like great options for your stats.
- jonas
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Hypothetical
After law school, what do you hope to do, and where do you hope to do it?
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Um I've come to realize that the LSAT is an unpredictable beast...My practice tests have ranged from 167 to a 175. I know I didn't perform up to my potential on my LSAT just because I bombed an entire LR section (-9) but I'm not confident I could do so much better on a retake because I realize if I mess up just one logic game then I pretty much bomb that section also.FuManChusco wrote:What do you think you could get on a retake? Those don't seem like great options for your stats.
Also I hope to work in NY since it's my hometown. NYC biglaw would probably be my #1 choice.
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Hypothetical
I voted retake since you were PTing up to 175.
Why do you assume your work experience won't be meaningful?
Why do you assume your work experience won't be meaningful?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Just a safe assumption. My job prospects aren't looking to great as of now.src42 wrote:I voted retake since you were PTing up to 175.
Why do you assume your work experience won't be meaningful?
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Cornell wouldn't be a bad option for you then. I think CLS, NYU and Penn would be better and are within striking distance if you can up that to a 170 or a 172. With your goals in mind, I would probably wait a year and retake.FiveSermon wrote:Um I've come to realize that the LSAT is an unpredictable beast...My practice tests have ranged from 167 to a 175. I know I didn't perform up to my potential on my LSAT just because I bombed an entire LR section (-9) but I'm not confident I could do so much better on a retake because I realize if I mess up just one logic game then I pretty much bomb that section also.FuManChusco wrote:What do you think you could get on a retake? Those don't seem like great options for your stats.
Also I hope to work in NY since it's my hometown. NYC biglaw would probably be my #1 choice.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Penn seems realistic but I'm not totally convinced it's that much better than Cornell in terms of NYC placement. CLS or NYU would be amazing but I hear NYU averages and CLS looks at more than numbers (which is bad for me).FuManChusco wrote:Cornell wouldn't be a bad option for you then. I think CLS, NYU and Penn would be better and are within striking distance if you can up that to a 170 or a 172. With your goals in mind, I would probably wait a year and retake.FiveSermon wrote:Um I've come to realize that the LSAT is an unpredictable beast...My practice tests have ranged from 167 to a 175. I know I didn't perform up to my potential on my LSAT just because I bombed an entire LR section (-9) but I'm not confident I could do so much better on a retake because I realize if I mess up just one logic game then I pretty much bomb that section also.FuManChusco wrote:What do you think you could get on a retake? Those don't seem like great options for your stats.
Also I hope to work in NY since it's my hometown. NYC biglaw would probably be my #1 choice.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Take the large scholarship at GWU.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
If it's any kind of news I haven't negotiated $ yet so maybe I could wring a few more $ out of BU/Fordham with the GWU $$.CanadianWolf wrote:Take the large scholarship at GWU.
Also it seems like the majority is leaning towards retake at this point...
- lolschool2011
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:14 pm
Re: Hypothetical
In this scenario, I'd alway suggest a retake. You have a YHS GPA, and this might be uncredited, but in my opinion, anyone capable of a 168, should (with more preparation) be able to crack into the 170s.FiveSermon wrote:I haven't heard from one of the schools here but other than that it seems like a reasonable estimate of what my choices will be.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
It would be worth it to your career to take a year and do whatever it takes to get a 175+.
- NoleinNY
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Retake or BU (or Texas, if you are in-state).
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
out of state.NoleinNY wrote:Retake or BU (or Texas, if you are in-state).
Also I'm just not sure if enough practice can get me to a 175+. I'm also not sure how law schools view an entire year of non meaningful work experience if my LSAT score doesn't dramatically improve.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Hypothetical
You're too pessimistic.FiveSermon wrote:out of state.NoleinNY wrote:Retake or BU (or Texas, if you are in-state).
Also I'm just not sure if enough practice can get me to a 175+. I'm also not sure how law schools view an entire year of non meaningful work experience if my LSAT score doesn't dramatically improve.

-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Or realisticsrc42 wrote:You're too pessimistic.FiveSermon wrote:out of state.NoleinNY wrote:Retake or BU (or Texas, if you are in-state).
Also I'm just not sure if enough practice can get me to a 175+. I'm also not sure how law schools view an entire year of non meaningful work experience if my LSAT score doesn't dramatically improve.

- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Hypothetical
From what I hear, getting more $ from Fordham is unlikelyFiveSermon wrote:If it's any kind of news I haven't negotiated $ yet so maybe I could wring a few more $ out of BU/Fordham with the GWU $$.CanadianWolf wrote:Take the large scholarship at GWU.
Also it seems like the majority is leaning towards retake at this point...
- 2things2
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:39 am
Re: Hypothetical
Pay the fees at Cornell and take the LSAT in June -- if you get a 175, pull out of Cornell and reapply to schools in the fall. If you blow it, just go to Cornell. Many people would love to have your dilemma. Either way I think you're going to make it out alive.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
take a year off
withdraw at all those schools i want to get into them
withdraw at all those schools i want to get into them
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
...BlueDiamond wrote:take a year off
withdraw at all those schools i want to get into them
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Hypothetical
+1lolschool2011 wrote:In this scenario, I'd alway suggest a retake. You have a YHS GPA, and this might be uncredited, but in my opinion, anyone capable of a 168, should (with more preparation) be able to crack into the 170s.FiveSermon wrote:I haven't heard from one of the schools here but other than that it seems like a reasonable estimate of what my choices will be.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
It would be worth it to your career to take a year and do whatever it takes to get a 175+.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Doesn't H average? I ruled that out a long time. Yale is too crazy and Stanford hates clean resumes like mine!beachbum wrote:+1lolschool2011 wrote:In this scenario, I'd alway suggest a retake. You have a YHS GPA, and this might be uncredited, but in my opinion, anyone capable of a 168, should (with more preparation) be able to crack into the 170s.FiveSermon wrote:I haven't heard from one of the schools here but other than that it seems like a reasonable estimate of what my choices will be.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
It would be worth it to your career to take a year and do whatever it takes to get a 175+.
But your advice is tempting...I should note I didn't consistently score 175+ but I did peak there a few times...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Hypothetical
Eh, your (self-described) lackluster softs combined with the slim probability of actually hitting 175+ probably means HYS are out. But if you're able to raise that score by just a few points (and you add to your resume during your off-year), you could conceivably get money at MVPDNC, and, depending on how high your new score is, you could be looking at acceptances in the CCN range.FiveSermon wrote:Doesn't H average? I ruled that out a long time. Yale is too crazy and Stanford hates clean resumes like mine!beachbum wrote:+1lolschool2011 wrote:In this scenario, I'd alway suggest a retake. You have a YHS GPA, and this might be uncredited, but in my opinion, anyone capable of a 168, should (with more preparation) be able to crack into the 170s.FiveSermon wrote:I haven't heard from one of the schools here but other than that it seems like a reasonable estimate of what my choices will be.
168/3.8 are my numbers btw.
It would be worth it to your career to take a year and do whatever it takes to get a 175+.
But your advice is tempting...I should note I didn't consistently score 175+ but I did peak there a few times...
FWIW, I'm one of those wacky TLS posters who thinks Cornell at sticker isn't a terrible idea for many (most?) people. But when you're looking at substantially better options (in terms of school selection and scholarships) by applying next year with a higher LSAT, the choice is clear.
If you really don't want to sit out a year, though, you could split the difference (as another poster mentioned) by reserving a seat at Cornell and taking the June LSAT, then choosing your strategy based on your new score.
- applepiecrust
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am
Re: Hypothetical
I think all of this is TCR. Did you get shut out of MVBP this year though?beachbum wrote:
Eh, your (self-described) lackluster softs combined with the slim probability of actually hitting 175+ probably means HYS are out. But if you're able to raise that score by just a few points (and you add to your resume during your off-year), you could conceivably get money at MVPDNC, and, depending on how high your new score is, you could be looking at acceptances in the CCN range.
FWIW, I'm one of those wacky TLS posters who thinks Cornell at sticker isn't a terrible idea for many (most?) people. But when you're looking at substantially better options (in terms of school selection and scholarships) by applying next year with a higher LSAT, the choice is clear.
If you really don't want to sit out a year, though, you could split the difference (as another poster mentioned) by reserving a seat at Cornell and taking the June LSAT, then choosing your strategy based on your new score.
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: Hypothetical
No I didn't apply. Lol.applepiecrust wrote:I think all of this is TCR. Did you get shut out of MVBP this year though?beachbum wrote:
Eh, your (self-described) lackluster softs combined with the slim probability of actually hitting 175+ probably means HYS are out. But if you're able to raise that score by just a few points (and you add to your resume during your off-year), you could conceivably get money at MVPDNC, and, depending on how high your new score is, you could be looking at acceptances in the CCN range.
FWIW, I'm one of those wacky TLS posters who thinks Cornell at sticker isn't a terrible idea for many (most?) people. But when you're looking at substantially better options (in terms of school selection and scholarships) by applying next year with a higher LSAT, the choice is clear.
If you really don't want to sit out a year, though, you could split the difference (as another poster mentioned) by reserving a seat at Cornell and taking the June LSAT, then choosing your strategy based on your new score.
-
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Hypothetical
+1src42 wrote: You're too pessimistic.
voted for cornell with that retake option. that's a great idea (if you can drop the $500 or whatever without it being a big deal).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login