BC/UNC debate Forum
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
BC/UNC debate
I know they are total opposites (COL/Regional prospects/JesuitvsState), but would you rather apply to become a tarheel or a golden eagle?
I want to have one more reach school on my list. I have attended a Jesuit high school/university, but doubt that would factor in much at BC, save for me having an idea of environment at BC.
Thanks everyone!
I want to have one more reach school on my list. I have attended a Jesuit high school/university, but doubt that would factor in much at BC, save for me having an idea of environment at BC.
Thanks everyone!
- pokerlaw

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:33 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
Do you want to practice in the Northeast or South?
-
Informative

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
Do you want biglaw or a southern firm?
If you want biglaw, go with BC.
If you want lower debt but slightly smaller firm, go with UNC.
Another way to look at it:
if you want the north east, go with BC.
If you want the south east (maybe entire south), go with UNC.
If you want biglaw, go with BC.
If you want lower debt but slightly smaller firm, go with UNC.
Another way to look at it:
if you want the north east, go with BC.
If you want the south east (maybe entire south), go with UNC.
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
159/3.54. Hence, the "hail mary" safety school, shot in the dark.jwrash wrote:numbers?
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
pokerlaw wrote:Do you want to practice in the Northeast or South?
Would prefer the Northeast. But I have family in the south (southeast Georgia/N.Florida) that doesn't rule out the SE.
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
Okay. That sounds like the best way to approach it. Thanks!Informative wrote:Do you want biglaw or a southern firm?
If you want biglaw, go with BC.
If you want lower debt but slightly smaller firm, go with UNC.
Another way to look at it:
if you want the north east, go with BC.
If you want the south east (maybe entire south), go with UNC.
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
Thanks for your input, everyone
- prezidentv8

- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
If this is a matter of places you're applying to, and you would attend either of them, just apply to both. Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks, ya know?
-
NJYankee6

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
prezidentv8 wrote:If this is a matter of places you're applying to, and you would attend either of them, just apply to both. Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks, ya know?
Good point.
-
concurrent fork

- Posts: 669
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:40 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
Unless you are URM, BC will not be an option anyway.NJYankee6 wrote:159/3.54. Hence, the "hail mary" safety school, shot in the dark.jwrash wrote:numbers?
- jwrash

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
no chance at UNC unless you're in-stateNJYankee6 wrote:159/3.54. Hence, the "hail mary" safety school, shot in the dark.jwrash wrote:numbers?
- BarbellDreams

- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
Sorry to say but unless you are a URM you won't have to make this choice because you won't get in. I don't have much experience with UNC, but nothing short of a family member on admission will get you into BC unless you are a URM.
-
coddus

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:05 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
I would def. go to BC. UNC Law is not a real law school.
- DeeCee

- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: BC/UNC debate
How is it not real?coddus wrote:I would def. go to BC. UNC Law is not a real law school.
- BarbellDreams

- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
I dont get the comment, but BC is better in every single way except if you get in state tuition at UNC.
-
ClayDavis

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:11 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
If you want biglaw from either of these schools, you're in for some serious disappointment.Informative wrote: If you want biglaw, go with BC.
-
CanadianWolf

- Posts: 11465
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
As noted above by another poster, if you are not a resident of North Carolina, then your chances of admission with your numbers are not good. UNC only admits about 15% &, I suspect, that the below median admits are in-state & URM--but at least one or the other if not both.
To which other law schools have you applied ?
To which other law schools have you applied ?
- Moral_Midgetry

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: BC/UNC debate
Retake if you want a shot at either of these schools.