. Forum
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:25 pm
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=141975reversejinx wrote:Which degree, in 50 years, when I'm an old man, will make the biggest impact when I tell some random person where I went to law school?
What you really want is this thread or the over 9000 like it all over the forum.
- megaTTTron
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
So you mean lay prestige.reversejinx wrote:Quick poll. Leaving out YHS, because they're too obvious, and giving no consideration to location, practice specification (i.e. biglaw, PI, etc.), or price ITE. Just pure prestige. Which degree, in 50 years, when I'm an old man, will make the biggest impact when I tell some random person where I went to law school? (You have three votes, so please select the top three.)
EDIT: damn, missed it by one!
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:25 pm
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Pure Prestige
None of them.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
OP said leaving HYS out.rayiner wrote:None of them.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
If you tell people Columbia the Ivy they will know the prestige. You just have to qualify that. Same as Penn. So I voted for the 3 Ivies.
- johnnyutah
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:00 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
I picked Duke and Georgetown, since they have basketball teams that win things.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
I picked Cornell because of Andy Bernard.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Pure Prestige
Yeah but you have to tell them that Columbia is an Ivy. Then it's only prestigious only by proxy - being put in the same group as H/Y.r6_philly wrote:OP said leaving HYS out.rayiner wrote:None of them.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
If you tell people Columbia the Ivy they will know the prestige. You just have to qualify that. Same as Penn. So I voted for the 3 Ivies.
- $1.99
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Pure Prestige
it is definitely not columbia, i have been around and no one knows what school that is. it is definitely berkeley, duke, and cornell.
- 2Serious4Numbers
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:14 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
have to give the edge to duke with the nationally recognizable basketball team$1.99 wrote:it is definitely not columbia, i have been around and no one knows what school that is. it is definitely berkeley, duke, and cornell.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
True, but at least you can legitimately apply prestige by proxy. Others on the list can't even be placed in the same league/level as HYP.rayiner wrote:Yeah but you have to tell them that Columbia is an Ivy. Then it's only prestigious only by proxy - being put in the same group as H/Y.r6_philly wrote:OP said leaving HYS out.rayiner wrote:None of them.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
If you tell people Columbia the Ivy they will know the prestige. You just have to qualify that. Same as Penn. So I voted for the 3 Ivies.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
UNC.2Serious4Numbers wrote:have to give the edge to duke with the nationally recognizable basketball team$1.99 wrote:it is definitely not columbia, i have been around and no one knows what school that is. it is definitely berkeley, duke, and cornell.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:25 pm
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
Columbia, Duke, Cornell. In the midwest, Northwestern.
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
I don't get why people would think Cornell is prestigious (or, at least, moreso than, say, Columbia). Most in the know consider it to be low on the Ivy totem pole, if a "real" Ivy at all (if you're going to be an Ivy prestige douche, at least be going to HYP). Most not in the know don't even recognize the name (at least, not anymore than they do Columbia's... and really, if you have to rely on "Ivy proxy prestige" with a lay person in either case, they will be ascribed the same amount of prestige). Maybe "the Office" has changed the game?
FWIW, I put Columbia, Duke, and Berkeley.
FWIW, I put Columbia, Duke, and Berkeley.
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: Pure Prestige
rayiner wrote:None of them.
Everyone knows what H/Y are. The majority of lay persons have never heard of Columbia.
? I think Columbia has a lot of lay prestige and that tons of people know its an Ivy, but certainly not in the way that H/Y/S are known.
In terms of law school lay prestige (and not general name prestige) I'm sure there are tons of people out there who don't even know Yale has a law school. The same person would prob know that Yale is generally one of the best schools though, and thus be impressed if someone told them they were going to Yale Law. I guess my point is that in gauging lay prestige you're dealing with (hypothetical) people who aren't fully informed yet about the nuances of law schools (what is the value of that really?).
Last edited by 3ThrowAway99 on Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
I think there is some value to it. Yeah, it won't help you with hiring Partners At Law firms, because they obviously know what's up, but it might help you interacting with clients and business people (the latter esp if you go transactional).Lawquacious wrote:I guess my point is that in gauging lay prestige the whole point is that youre dealing with people who aren't fully informed yet about the nuances of law schools (what is the value of that really?).
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
I came across quite a few Cooley grads as partners in Philly when I was doing my firm research this week. Just saying.mrmangs wrote:I think there is some value to it. Yeah, it won't help you with hiring partners at law firms, because they obviously know what's up, but it might help you interacting with clients and business people (the latter esp if you go transactional).Lawquacious wrote:I guess my point is that in gauging lay prestige the whole point is that youre dealing with people who aren't fully informed yet about the nuances of law schools (what is the value of that really?).
- johnnyutah
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:00 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
Hahah, what firms?r6_philly wrote:I came across quite a few Cooley grads as partners in Philly when I was doing my firm research this week. Just saying.
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: Pure Prestige
Yeah, that's true- name prestige can carry some weight. I don't really think considering these things is pointless. However, I think the U.S. legal field is probably way too caught up in the issue of prestige (including myself), and that there are some negative consequences of focusing on prestige (e.g. it can become difficult to be open to objective information that may not be consistent with the prestige value given to an institution).mrmangs wrote:I think there is some value to it. Yeah, it won't help you with hiring partners at law firms, because they obviously know what's up, but it might help you interacting with clients and business people (the latter esp if you go transactional).Lawquacious wrote:I guess my point is that in gauging lay prestige the whole point is that youre dealing with people who aren't fully informed yet about the nuances of law schools (what is the value of that really?).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Pure Prestige
Any time I see someone on TV going to a law school, it's always Georgetown.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:25 pm
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
This thread is familiar.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Pure Prestige
What you want me to dig them back up? I wasn't writing names down. There were also quite a few WCU (my UG) -> Widener partners. So what's wrong with T4?johnnyutah wrote:Hahah, what firms?r6_philly wrote:I came across quite a few Cooley grads as partners in Philly when I was doing my firm research this week. Just saying.

I browsed firms on this list and a few others:
http://www.averyindex.com/philadelphia.php
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login