GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9 Forum
- Emeth!
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:44 am
GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Like the school and love the DC area. but, is it worth it to throw a 170/3.9 at a school like GW? will i still get substainial mula from the school if i don't get the full ride early desicion thing?
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
I wouldn't go to GW with those numbers. your call though.Emeth! wrote:Like the school and love the DC area. but, is it worth it to throw a 170/3.9 at a school like GW? will i still get substainial mula from the school if i don't get the full ride early desicion thing?
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
You get 76500 at UT and 45000 at UM. Can update you when I get more offers 

- tea_drinker
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:44 am
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Second this.FuManChusco wrote:I wouldn't go to GW with those numbers. your call though.Emeth! wrote:Like the school and love the DC area. but, is it worth it to throw a 170/3.9 at a school like GW? will i still get substainial mula from the school if i don't get the full ride early desicion thing?
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Third.tea_drinker wrote:Second this.FuManChusco wrote:I wouldn't go to GW with those numbers. your call though.Emeth! wrote:Like the school and love the DC area. but, is it worth it to throw a 170/3.9 at a school like GW? will i still get substainial mula from the school if i don't get the full ride early desicion thing?
Do not ED. You will get in with alot of money RD.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:25 am
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
-
Last edited by Gc12 on Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KMaine
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:57 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
It depends on what you want. If you want to minimize debt, the GW thing may be your best option out there. If you want to maximize your chances at Biglaw, you should go to Virginia, you will probably get a little money and graduate with about $150K in debt. I would decide now whether GW would be worth it to you. You seem like you are a very safe bet to get some sort of money at a lower t-14 (less than half scholarship). I think t-6 is a long shot. I think your choices are rather clear cut.
I would probably do GW, but then again, I would be happy with midlaw if it meant little debt.
I would probably do GW, but then again, I would be happy with midlaw if it meant little debt.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
dude. 167/3.53/URM is HYS. You could get a huge scholly to GTown. You're an idiot if you ED to GW. OP shouldn't ED because he'll get gobs of money RD anyways. might as well leave his options open. The DC market is in the shitter. and I'm not just talking crap about GW. I'd kill to get in. I just don't think it's the best option with those numbers ITE. The 100k he'll save now is not worth even close to the career opportunities he'll have going to a t14.Gc12 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with the answers so far, but I would add that if you actually think you would pick GWU anyway (all things being equal), then there is no reason not to maximize full scholly chances and do the binding ED program.
If you would prefer other schools you might realistically get into, then I would keep your options open.
However, not everyone wants to go to the highest-ranked school they get into. I'm strongly considering applying to the GWU ED program, and I think I could probably get into somewhere higher with some $ (I'm 167/3.53 (3.90 last two years) URM, 5 years strong WE). Even if I got a partial scholly to lower T14, I feel like I might prefer GWU -- I like the idea of being in DC, the school itself appeals to me for various reasons, and I seem to just picture myself there (in a positive way) more than I do with any other school. If you feel more or less the same way... then why not just go for it?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:25 am
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
-
Last edited by Gc12 on Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Gc12 wrote:Does the URM boost really make that big a difference? It's Native American (and I'm part Native American/part white, so checking off both on applications), by the way. My thinking was that my numbers are good but not great (basically not quite good enough for T14 on their own), but that the URM boost/strong softs might get me a little $ at lower T14 -- I like GWU and figured I would prefer a full ride at GWU to, say, some money at T10-T14. HYS hasn't even been on my radar. Does 167/3.53 with URM really beat 170/3.9 w/o URM by that much? I just didn't think it was that big a boost.FuManChusco wrote:dude. 167/3.53/URM is HYS. You could get a huge scholly to GTown. You're an idiot if you ED to GW. OP shouldn't ED because he'll get gobs of money RD anyways. might as well leave his options open. The DC market is in the shitter. and I'm not just talking crap about GW. I'd kill to get in. I just don't think it's the best option with those numbers ITE. The 100k he'll save now is not worth even close to the career opportunities he'll have going to a t14.Gc12 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with the answers so far, but I would add that if you actually think you would pick GWU anyway (all things being equal), then there is no reason not to maximize full scholly chances and do the binding ED program.
If you would prefer other schools you might realistically get into, then I would keep your options open.
However, not everyone wants to go to the highest-ranked school they get into. I'm strongly considering applying to the GWU ED program, and I think I could probably get into somewhere higher with some $ (I'm 167/3.53 (3.90 last two years) URM, 5 years strong WE). Even if I got a partial scholly to lower T14, I feel like I might prefer GWU -- I like the idea of being in DC, the school itself appeals to me for various reasons, and I seem to just picture myself there (in a positive way) more than I do with any other school. If you feel more or less the same way... then why not just go for it?
If you write a DS about how being Native has significantly affected your life then YES the boost IS that big. There are plenty of mixed people out there. It shouldn't decrease your boost-- or it's very unlikely
Writing the DS is essential though
if you check NDN and White and then don't write anything, they'll think you're one of those my great great great grandmother was a Cherokee princess people
You will get money at the T-6-T-14 so don't apply to GW except as a back up
if you like DC
go to Georgetown
Last edited by s0ph1e2007 on Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Not unless you have a tribal card. Probably need a ballin' diversity statement too.Gc12 wrote:Does the URM boost really make that big a difference? It's Native American (and I'm part Native American/part white, so checking off both on applications), by the way. My thinking was that my numbers are good but not great (basically not quite good enough for T14 on their own), but that the URM boost/strong softs might get me a little $ at lower T14 -- I like GWU and figured I would prefer a full ride at GWU to, say, some money at T10-T14. HYS hasn't even been on my radar. Does 167/3.53 with URM really beat 170/3.9 w/o URM by that much? I just didn't think it was that big a boost.FuManChusco wrote:dude. 167/3.53/URM is HYS. You could get a huge scholly to GTown. You're an idiot if you ED to GW. OP shouldn't ED because he'll get gobs of money RD anyways. might as well leave his options open. The DC market is in the shitter. and I'm not just talking crap about GW. I'd kill to get in. I just don't think it's the best option with those numbers ITE. The 100k he'll save now is not worth even close to the career opportunities he'll have going to a t14.Gc12 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with the answers so far, but I would add that if you actually think you would pick GWU anyway (all things being equal), then there is no reason not to maximize full scholly chances and do the binding ED program.
If you would prefer other schools you might realistically get into, then I would keep your options open.
However, not everyone wants to go to the highest-ranked school they get into. I'm strongly considering applying to the GWU ED program, and I think I could probably get into somewhere higher with some $ (I'm 167/3.53 (3.90 last two years) URM, 5 years strong WE). Even if I got a partial scholly to lower T14, I feel like I might prefer GWU -- I like the idea of being in DC, the school itself appeals to me for various reasons, and I seem to just picture myself there (in a positive way) more than I do with any other school. If you feel more or less the same way... then why not just go for it?
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
ohhhhh ahhhh I HATE this conversation. Don't make stuff up! A ridiculous number of Tribes aren't even federally recognized. A Tribal card isn't required, and they don't even ask you for one.stratocophic wrote: Not unless you have a tribal card. Probably need a ballin' diversity statement too.
On the other hand a DS IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
I'll just leave this here.... http://lawschoolnumbers.com/NYY2013/jdGc12 wrote:Does the URM boost really make that big a difference? It's Native American (and I'm part Native American/Part white, so checking off both on applications), by the way. My thinking was that my numbers are good but not great (basically not quite good enough for T14 on their own), but that the URM boost/strong softs might get me a little $ at lower T14 -- I like GW and figured I would prefer a full ride at GWU to, say, some money at T10-T14. HYS hasn't even been on my radar.FuManChusco wrote:dude. 167/3.53/URM is HYS. You could get a huge scholly to GTown. You're an idiot if you ED to GW. OP shouldn't ED because he'll get gobs of money RD anyways. might as well leave his options open. The DC market is in the shitter. and I'm not just talking crap about GW. I'd kill to get in. I just don't think it's the best option with those numbers ITE. The 100k he'll save now is not worth even close to the career opportunities he'll have going to a t14.Gc12 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with the answers so far, but I would add that if you actually think you would pick GWU anyway (all things being equal), then there is no reason not to maximize full scholly chances and do the binding ED program.
If you would prefer other schools you might realistically get into, then I would keep your options open.
However, not everyone wants to go to the highest-ranked school they get into. I'm strongly considering applying to the GWU ED program, and I think I could probably get into somewhere higher with some $ (I'm 167/3.53 (3.90 last two years) URM, 5 years strong WE). Even if I got a partial scholly to lower T14, I feel like I might prefer GWU -- I like the idea of being in DC, the school itself appeals to me for various reasons, and I seem to just picture myself there (in a positive way) more than I do with any other school. If you feel more or less the same way... then why not just go for it?
HYS is actually kind of a long shot. A 3.6 or 170 would help you. I would definitely take a shot at the T3 though. I doubt you'll have to attend lower than T6. Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- s0ph1e2007
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
yes, you don't.FuManChusco wrote: Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Sorry, not trying to be harsh, but don't just guess about something you have no idea about. What if they take your advice?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:25 am
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
-
Last edited by Gc12 on Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Well, I put a disclaimer. What advice would he have taken? "Oh I need an ID card. Welp I guess I'll just check Caucasian then." He'd have to be an idiot to blindly take advice from a forum. No offense, but you're a jackass.s0ph1e2007 wrote:yes, you don't.FuManChusco wrote: Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Sorry, not trying to be harsh, but don't just guess about something you have no idea about. What if they take your advice?
-
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:30 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Don't put someone down for correcting your ignorant statement. Just move on. NO OFFENSE.FuManChusco wrote:Well, I put a disclaimer. What advice would he have taken? "Oh I need an ID card. Welp I guess I'll just check Caucasian then." He'd have to be an idiot to blindly take advice from a forum. No offense, but you're a jackass.s0ph1e2007 wrote:yes, you don't.FuManChusco wrote: Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Sorry, not trying to be harsh, but don't just guess about something you have no idea about. What if they take your advice?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Hmm... i will say this is a tough call if you don't have a tribal affiliation card (probably meaning you aren't an active member in the culture) just because I really don't think NAs are actively discriminated against -- though historical discrimination still has effects today. However, if you can write a decent diversity statement about it then it is probably ok to check off even if you don't have tribal affiliations.JakeL wrote:Don't put someone down for correcting your ignorant statement. Just move on. NO OFFENSE.FuManChusco wrote:Well, I put a disclaimer. What advice would he have taken? "Oh I need an ID card. Welp I guess I'll just check Caucasian then." He'd have to be an idiot to blindly take advice from a forum. No offense, but you're a jackass.s0ph1e2007 wrote:yes, you don't.FuManChusco wrote: Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Sorry, not trying to be harsh, but don't just guess about something you have no idea about. What if they take your advice?
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Not having a card does not mean you aren't an active member.AreJay711 wrote:[\
Hmm... i will say this is a tough call if you don't have a tribal affiliation card (probably meaning you aren't an active member in the culture) just because I really don't think NAs are actively discriminated against -- though historical discrimination still has effects today. However, if you can write a decent diversity statement about it then it is probably ok to check off even if you don't have tribal affiliations.
and discrimination (now or back in the day) is not what the boost is about. It's about having the same percentage of a race/ethnicity in law school as in the overall population (let's say there are 6% NA in the whole US but only 2% in law school. The boost is meant to help get that LS percentage up not to make up for past discrimination)
ETA: before someone jumps all over me about my incorrect statistics or some shit: those are made up numbers.
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Ok you might be right. I'm part NA and those are just my reasons for not having my tribal identification card and not applying as a NA.LSpleaseee wrote:Not having a card does not mean you aren't an active member.AreJay711 wrote:[\
Hmm... i will say this is a tough call if you don't have a tribal affiliation card (probably meaning you aren't an active member in the culture) just because I really don't think NAs are actively discriminated against -- though historical discrimination still has effects today. However, if you can write a decent diversity statement about it then it is probably ok to check off even if you don't have tribal affiliations.
and discrimination (now or back in the day) is not what the boost is about. It's about having the same percentage of a race/ethnicity in law school as in the overall population (let's say there are 6% NA in the whole US but only 2% in law school. The boost is meant to help get that LS percentage up not to make up for past discrimination)
ETA: before someone jumps all over me about my incorrect statistics or some shit: those are made up numbers.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
Ah I see. I just know that there are a lot of technicalities that don't allow people who are very involved in their community to get cards whereas the "my great great great great grandma who I didn't even know existed until last year is NA" people can get a card easily. The card might signify involvement but it might not. Are you not even checking NA on apps?AreJay711 wrote:Ok you might be right. I'm part NA and those are just my reasons for not having my tribal identification card and not applying as a NA.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
idk anything about URM, but if i'm guessing, i'd say 167 3.53 URM can be better than 170 3.9 at schools that have medians below 3.53 and 167, because then the URM helps them on multiple fronts.
with a 170 3.9 you would be an idiot to apply to GWU ED.
why'd they give u $ when they don't have to?
170 3.9 is top 5 good.
with a 170 3.9 you would be an idiot to apply to GWU ED.
why'd they give u $ when they don't have to?
170 3.9 is top 5 good.
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
No because the thing on LSAC says you need to be active in the tribe or have the identification card. Maybe that was a pretty epic fail though. I did check it on UCLA though because they had two and one was for data purposes and didn't have to write a tribal affiliation on it,LSpleaseee wrote:Ah I see. I just know that there are a lot of technicalities that don't allow people who are very involved in their community to get cards whereas the "my great great great great grandma who I didn't even know existed until last year is NA" people can get a card easily. The card might signify involvement but it might not. Are you not even checking NA on apps?AreJay711 wrote:Ok you might be right. I'm part NA and those are just my reasons for not having my tribal identification card and not applying as a NA.
- Pleasye
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
GW is different than other schools because it gives all of its ED applicants full scholarships.justadude55 wrote:idk anything about URM, but if i'm guessing, i'd say 167 3.53 URM can be better than 170 3.9 at schools that have medians below 3.53 and 167, because then the URM helps them on multiple fronts.
with a 170 3.9 you would be an idiot to apply to GWU ED.
why'd they give u $ when they don't have to?
170 3.9 is top 5 good.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: GW worth EDing for with a 170/3.9
you are so gayJakeL wrote:Don't put someone down for correcting your ignorant statement. Just move on. NO OFFENSE.FuManChusco wrote:Well, I put a disclaimer. What advice would he have taken? "Oh I need an ID card. Welp I guess I'll just check Caucasian then." He'd have to be an idiot to blindly take advice from a forum. No offense, but you're a jackass.s0ph1e2007 wrote:yes, you don't.FuManChusco wrote: Probably need the ID card if you're NA though. I have no clue how that works.
Sorry, not trying to be harsh, but don't just guess about something you have no idea about. What if they take your advice?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login