Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond???? Forum
- doug_7506
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:16 pm
Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Hypothetically, how do you decide between going into a school on a full scholarship and going into a higher ranked school with no scholarship. Since LSAT is suppose to be somewhat of a reflection of how you will perform in law school, would it make since to go to like a t-2 school on a full ride where your LSAT is >95%? Theroteically you should finish in he top 5% to 15% and lock the best job offers from the school. Or what it be wiser to go to a t-1 law school where you fall about average to below average LSAT wise and have to take almost 100k in loans. According to your LSAT you should finish in the middle half of the pack and take what jobs are left after everyone else gobbles up the other ones. Can you take that t-1 JD back to the t-2 schools market and grab the top jobs?? How many spots in the ranking do you think it takes to matter?? Does a top 10% at a t-2 say ranked 80 with a full ride = a t-1 top 50% ranked 40th with little to no scholly? Does t-1 top 5% ranked 20 no scholly = a t-2 top 5% ranked 60th with full scholly?
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Hey don't take this personally, but are your numbers in your profile accurate? Because if they are I'm not seeing how any of the above may occur....
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
You make getting law review/top of the class way to easy just because you have a higher LSAT score than other students.doug_7506 wrote:Hypothetically, how do you decide between going into a school on a full scholarship and going into a higher ranked school with no scholarship. Since LSAT is suppose to be somewhat of a reflection of how you will perform in law school, would it make since to go to like a t-2 school on a full ride where your LSAT is >95%? Theroteically you should finish in he top 5% to 15% and lock the best job offers from the school. Or what it be wiser to go to a t-1 law school where you fall about average to below average LSAT wise and have to take almost 100k in loans. According to your LSAT you should finish in the middle half of the pack and take what jobs are left after everyone else gobbles up the other ones. Can you take that t-1 JD back to the t-2 schools market and grab the top jobs?? How many spots in the ranking do you think it takes to matter?? Does a top 10% at a t-2 say ranked 80 with a full ride = a t-1 top 50% ranked 40th with little to no scholly? Does t-1 top 5% ranked 20 no scholly = a t-2 top 5% ranked 60th with full scholly?
edit: And I don't feel like doing the math for it, but I feel pretty confident in saying that even if you have an LSAT score higher than 95% of the other students, you're still statistically more likely to end up outside of the top 15% than you are to end up in it.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Also, your LSAT does not predict where you will end up. The correlation is less than 50% thereby making it a poor predictor.
Last edited by Aberzombie1892 on Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Actually, I just did the math and I'd say there's about an 85% chance of itRPK34 wrote:You make getting law review/top of the class way to easy just because you have a higher LSAT score than other students.doug_7506 wrote:Hypothetically, how do you decide between going into a school on a full scholarship and going into a higher ranked school with no scholarship. Since LSAT is suppose to be somewhat of a reflection of how you will perform in law school, would it make since to go to like a t-2 school on a full ride where your LSAT is >95%? Theroteically you should finish in he top 5% to 15% and lock the best job offers from the school. Or what it be wiser to go to a t-1 law school where you fall about average to below average LSAT wise and have to take almost 100k in loans. According to your LSAT you should finish in the middle half of the pack and take what jobs are left after everyone else gobbles up the other ones. Can you take that t-1 JD back to the t-2 schools market and grab the top jobs?? How many spots in the ranking do you think it takes to matter?? Does a top 10% at a t-2 say ranked 80 with a full ride = a t-1 top 50% ranked 40th with little to no scholly? Does t-1 top 5% ranked 20 no scholly = a t-2 top 5% ranked 60th with full scholly?
edit: And I don't feel like doing the math for it, but I feel pretty confident in saying that even if you have an LSAT score higher than 95% of the other students, you're still statistically more likely to end up outside of the top 15% than you are to end up in it.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I don't remember the exact numbers, but there's a correlation of about 23% between LSAT scores and law school rank. From this, you can calculate different percentages of the likelihood of falling in different percentile ranks at law school.stratocophic wrote:Actually, I just did the math and I'd say there's about an 85% chance of itRPK34 wrote:You make getting law review/top of the class way to easy just because you have a higher LSAT score than other students.doug_7506 wrote:Hypothetically, how do you decide between going into a school on a full scholarship and going into a higher ranked school with no scholarship. Since LSAT is suppose to be somewhat of a reflection of how you will perform in law school, would it make since to go to like a t-2 school on a full ride where your LSAT is >95%? Theroteically you should finish in he top 5% to 15% and lock the best job offers from the school. Or what it be wiser to go to a t-1 law school where you fall about average to below average LSAT wise and have to take almost 100k in loans. According to your LSAT you should finish in the middle half of the pack and take what jobs are left after everyone else gobbles up the other ones. Can you take that t-1 JD back to the t-2 schools market and grab the top jobs?? How many spots in the ranking do you think it takes to matter?? Does a top 10% at a t-2 say ranked 80 with a full ride = a t-1 top 50% ranked 40th with little to no scholly? Does t-1 top 5% ranked 20 no scholly = a t-2 top 5% ranked 60th with full scholly?
edit: And I don't feel like doing the math for it, but I feel pretty confident in saying that even if you have an LSAT score higher than 95% of the other students, you're still statistically more likely to end up outside of the top 15% than you are to end up in it.
So no, there's not an 85% chance.
- LeDique
- Posts: 13462
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Giving preference to?Aberzombie1892 wrote: Insular means at least the following markets:
Seattle, WA
- Cmoss
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
if i was told correctly law school is all about the name. i was told to get into the highest ranked school as possible. that being said you better be in the top 50% if your going to pay $200k for law $chool
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Because 153's end up in a school with other 153's, and 170's end up in classes with 170's. It's called range restriction.Aberzombie1892 wrote:Also, your LSAT does not predict where you will end up. The correlation is less than 50% thereby making it a poor predictor.
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I'd pay 200k for any class rank at Harvard - as long as I made law review.Cmoss wrote:if i was told correctly law school is all about the name. i was told to get into the highest ranked school as possible. that being said you better be in the top 50% if your going to pay $200k for law $chool
Conversely, I would pay 200k for Yale. No ranking FTW?
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I love youDesert Fox wrote:Because 153's end up in a school with other 153's, and 170's end up in classes with 170's. It's called range restriction.Aberzombie1892 wrote:Also, your LSAT does not predict where you will end up. The correlation is less than 50% thereby making it a poor predictor.
- Cmoss
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
you might be rightResolutePear wrote:I'd pay 200k for any class rank at Harvard - as long as I made law review.Cmoss wrote:if i was told correctly law school is all about the name. i was told to get into the highest ranked school as possible. that being said you better be in the top 50% if your going to pay $200k for law $chool
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
There are over 9000 threads about this subject in which "big fish in a small pond" is pretty much resoundingly rejected.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Isn't that the whole foundation of NorB?rad law wrote:There are over 9000 threads about this subject in which "big fish in a small pond" is pretty much resoundingly rejected.
- doug_7506
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:16 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
161 was my retake score. I am not gunning for anything in the top 30, rank wise.kehoema2 wrote:Hey don't take this personally, but are your numbers in your profile accurate? Because if they are I'm not seeing how any of the above may occur....
I was just wondering how people felt. Funny that it is split 50/50.
I know the LSAT is not a perfect indicator of rank but it can help give you an idea.
- Cupidity
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Big fish small pond would be great....
If you could guarantee you were top of class. Very smart people go to very dumb schools. I know people far smarter than I am at T4's who are there for personal reasons or because they bombed the LSAT.
If you could guarantee you were top of class. Very smart people go to very dumb schools. I know people far smarter than I am at T4's who are there for personal reasons or because they bombed the LSAT.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I do not believe that the poll options reflect the full spectrum of potential outcomes.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ResolutePear
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Just write in Chuck Norris.Bildungsroman wrote:I do not believe that the poll options reflect the full spectrum of potential outcomes.
- prezidentv8
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I vote for Bruce Bochy.ResolutePear wrote:Just write in Chuck Norris.Bildungsroman wrote:I do not believe that the poll options reflect the full spectrum of potential outcomes.
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Something tells me OP will be a small fish in every pond.
- Ragged
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Where is the option of big fish in big pond? Cuz that's what I'm planning on being... 

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
I only swim in the ocean HTHRagged wrote:Where is the option of big fish in big pond? Cuz that's what I'm planning on being...
- reasonable_man
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
doug_7506 wrote:161 was my retake score. I am not gunning for anything in the top 30, rank wise.kehoema2 wrote:Hey don't take this personally, but are your numbers in your profile accurate? Because if they are I'm not seeing how any of the above may occur....
I was just wondering how people felt. Funny that it is split 50/50.
I know the LSAT is not a perfect indicator of rank but it can help give you an idea.
Nah. It really can't.
- prezidentv8
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: Big Fish Small Pond or Big Fish Big Pond????
Reasonable man knows whats up with trying to predict a single data point versus an average.reasonable_man wrote:doug_7506 wrote:161 was my retake score. I am not gunning for anything in the top 30, rank wise.kehoema2 wrote:Hey don't take this personally, but are your numbers in your profile accurate? Because if they are I'm not seeing how any of the above may occur....
I was just wondering how people felt. Funny that it is split 50/50.
I know the LSAT is not a perfect indicator of rank but it can help give you an idea.
Nah. It really can't.
But yeah, as a general point, don't rely on your test score as a measure of your abilities. Wherever you go, just make sure you hustle like nobody's business once you get there.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login