3.44, 168 Forum
- nsideirish
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am
Re: 3.44, 168
Where do you want to practice? This is a bit broad of a question
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:22 am
- nsideirish
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am
Re: 3.44, 168
Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
Not even a prayer at ED to UVA without a 170. It seriously wouldn't even be worth the $12.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
In at all other than UCLA and perhaps USC.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: 3.44, 168
Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
UNC-Chapel Hill--definitely in
UGa--definitely in
Emory--definitely in
Wake Forest--definitely in
William and Mary--definitely in
UCLA (reach, I know)--definitely not in
USC--waitlist-->out
UC-Hastings--in
UC-Davis--in
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
I think that seems accuratejustadude55 wrote:Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
UNC-Chapel Hill--definitely in
UGa--definitely in
Emory--definitely in
Wake Forest--definitely in
William and Mary--definitely in
UCLA (reach, I know)--definitely not in
USC--waitlist-->out
UC-Hastings--in
UC-Davis--in
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: 3.44, 168
UVA does seem to like accepting ED's...jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
i'm purposefully waiting till december to possibly ED to UVA.
- nsideirish
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am
Re: 3.44, 168
I wouldn't call it "rediculous." Vandy is not out of the question. And one person who applied to UVA ED this cycle with similar numbers on LSN was WL so I would not say its pointless and a waste of $12. OP wouldn't have a great shot but there is nothing wrong with having a super-reach or two.jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: 3.44, 168
does he have a waiver to UVA?
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:22 am
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:22 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- thexfactor
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am
Re: 3.44, 168
id def apply to vandy. Try your hardest on getting into vandy. Vandy is much better in terms of placement than compared to schools in the GW/WUSTL/Emory range.....
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: 3.44, 168
Vandy is an auto-ding with their medians (3.72/169).thexfactor wrote:id def apply to vandy. Try your hardest on getting into vandy. Vandy is much better in terms of placement than compared to schools in the GW/WUSTL/Emory range.....
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
Vandy will WL OP then never let him in.nsideirish wrote:Vandy is not out of the question.
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
UVA likes ED with people who have at least one high number (you are below both medians) so you are definitely out.... Like I wouldn't even waste my money if I were you. Vandy won't let you In either. Ed to ucla would be your best not wasted EDjustadude55 wrote:UVA does seem to like accepting ED's...jt1341 wrote:This whole post is just rediculous. Obviously you havent paid any attention to UVA's ED process. No shot at UVA,Mich, or Vandy sorry.nsideirish wrote:Weak GPA but you should be good at most of those except UCLA. Have you thought about ED to UVA? Might be worth a shot. And also try for Vandy.
OP, you made yourself a good list for where you want to practice. I would apply to all those you listed and maybe ED to UCLA just for the hell of it. probably no chance, but it can only help
i'm purposefully waiting till december to possibly ED to UVA.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:16 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
Not to be a downer (maybe I was just unlucky) but I had similar stats to you and was rejected at USC/UCLA and WL'd at W&M. Make sure to have some backup schools on that list as you're probably right on the bubble for the rest of themPDL wrote:Southeast or West Coast.
My application list so far is:
UNC-Chapel Hill
UGa
Emory
Wake Forest
William and Mary
UCLA (reach, I know)
USC
UC-Hastings
UC-Davis
Thoughts on those? Thanks!
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:22 am
-
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am
Re: 3.44, 168
As your numbers twin 2yrs out of UG, with an interest in west coast (and mtn west), I'd 100% agree with this assessment...justadude55 wrote:Harvard! Jk from this list:PDL wrote:Alright TLS, what should be considered my "reach" schools?
UNC-Chapel Hill grad, 3.44 GPA
168 LSAT (third time, though. 159 in June of '08, 160 in Dec. of 2009)
White male
2 years work experience
Any responses are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
UNC-Chapel Hill--definitely in
UGa--definitely in
Emory--definitely in
Wake Forest--definitely in
William and Mary--definitely in
UCLA (reach, I know)--definitely not in
USC--waitlist-->out
UC-Hastings--in
UC-Davis--in
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:26 am
Re: 3.44, 168
Alabama will almost certainly through buckets of cash at you with those numbers, so if you'd like to avoid debt it might be a good fit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lateforthesky16
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:05 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
I applied with the same numbers last year, to most of those schools except USC. I was waitlisted ED at UCLA and waitlisted at William and Mary. I wrote the special essays for W&M too so I'm not sure why I didn't get in, although lots of people with generally high numbers for W&M were waitlisted last year. I ended up at UC Davis and I'm enjoying it for the most part so far. I think that's a great list of schools. USC might be a stretch, but probably still worth the application if you really want to go. I really like Emory and UNC, hopefully you get in. I'm not too familiar with UNC's process but you should be a lock at Emory. Best of luck!
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:22 am
-
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:33 am
Re: 3.44, 168
IMO you're a lock at at least Wake, UGA, and Emory (prob w/ $), probably others, so I think you have enough 'safeties'PDL wrote:Thanks to all for the input. To be quite honest, my preference is to stay on the east coast unless I can somehow weasel into UCLA or USC. If it comes down to UNC/UGa/Emory/W+M vs. Hastings/Davis, I'll probably stay out here, unless $$ somehow plays a big role.
Should I consider Wake Forest my safety school, or apply to a few others?

-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 3.44, 168
+1krad wrote:IMO you're a lock at at least Wake, UGA, and Emory (prob w/ $), probably others, so I think you have enough 'safeties'PDL wrote:Thanks to all for the input. To be quite honest, my preference is to stay on the east coast unless I can somehow weasel into UCLA or USC. If it comes down to UNC/UGa/Emory/W+M vs. Hastings/Davis, I'll probably stay out here, unless $$ somehow plays a big role.
Should I consider Wake Forest my safety school, or apply to a few others?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login