FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT Forum
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
I guess what I'm asking is, if you had the choice, would you take G-town part time or Franklin Pierce full ride. Assuming a career in patent prep/pros with graduate work in chemistry and undergrad in chemical engineering.
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
-
czelede

- Posts: 689
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
If you're looking into patent law, with your background I would personally take FP - it's ranked very well above its tier in terms of IP law and from what I've heard, your undergrad/masters/WE is fairly important for IP law.
Georgetown does have the mad lay prestige though
I wouldn't say it's worth sacrificing a full ride at a good IP law school for though...
Georgetown does have the mad lay prestige though
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Money's good, I'd like to make more of it. Turns out that a master's in chemistry pays about 45k. I'd like to double that and possibly even triple it. Not really interested in "model and bottle". Not really interested in mcmansions and mercedes.tesoro wrote:Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
I'll get hired either way? That runs contrary to so much that I've been reading about, i.e. that the vast majority of lawyers are having a lot of trouble getting hired. Eve at the t14 I'm hearing that things are getting rough, especially in the lower 3/6.
Another consideration is FPLC -> UNH School of Law. One of the goals of this merger is explicitly stated "Get Pierce's USNWR ranking into the top 100". If Pierce were to be on the rise for the next few years I might be kicking myself for not taking a free ride there while they were still not too difficult to get. Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
It isn't.androstan wrote:Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Though I've heard that FPLC is well-respected for IP, I do not know more than what I've casually read.
How much would you work if went to GULC part-time? How much would you make? Would you want to transfer into their FT when you could?
How much would you work if went to GULC part-time? How much would you make? Would you want to transfer into their FT when you could?
-
czelede

- Posts: 689
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Very true, but IP Law does not totally fall into the same category as BigLaw (which is what much of the T14 aims for). You could easily score a job with an IP boutique with the proper undergraduate/graduate/industry experience and a JD from a strong patent law program. Even more so if you're a female.androstan wrote:Money's good, I'd like to make more of it. Turns out that a master's in chemistry pays about 45k. I'd like to double that and possibly even triple it. Not really interested in "model and bottle". Not really interested in mcmansions and mercedes.tesoro wrote:Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
I'll get hired either way? That runs contrary to so much that I've been reading about, i.e. that the vast majority of lawyers are having a lot of trouble getting hired. Eve at the t14 I'm hearing that things are getting rough, especially in the lower 3/6.
Another consideration is FPLC -> UNH School of Law. One of the goals of this merger is explicitly stated "Get Pierce's USNWR ranking into the top 100". If Pierce were to be on the rise for the next few years I might be kicking myself for not taking a free ride there while they were still not too difficult to get. Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything.
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Why female? Should I get a sex change operation?czelede wrote:Very true, but IP Law does not totally fall into the same category as BigLaw (which is what much of the T14 aims for). You could easily score a job with an IP boutique with the proper undergraduate/graduate/industry experience and a JD from a strong patent law program. Even more so if you're a female.androstan wrote:Money's good, I'd like to make more of it. Turns out that a master's in chemistry pays about 45k. I'd like to double that and possibly even triple it. Not really interested in "model and bottle". Not really interested in mcmansions and mercedes.tesoro wrote:Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
I'll get hired either way? That runs contrary to so much that I've been reading about, i.e. that the vast majority of lawyers are having a lot of trouble getting hired. Eve at the t14 I'm hearing that things are getting rough, especially in the lower 3/6.
Another consideration is FPLC -> UNH School of Law. One of the goals of this merger is explicitly stated "Get Pierce's USNWR ranking into the top 100". If Pierce were to be on the rise for the next few years I might be kicking myself for not taking a free ride there while they were still not too difficult to get. Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything.
-
czelede

- Posts: 689
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
There's a lack of women in these fields (moreso engineering into patent law than hard science into patent law, but I imagine its not that different) so being a female gives you a slight "URM" type boost for such jobs. Given that you're decently qualified to begin with, that is.androstan wrote:Why female? Should I get a sex change operation?czelede wrote:Very true, but IP Law does not totally fall into the same category as BigLaw (which is what much of the T14 aims for). You could easily score a job with an IP boutique with the proper undergraduate/graduate/industry experience and a JD from a strong patent law program. Even more so if you're a female.androstan wrote:Money's good, I'd like to make more of it. Turns out that a master's in chemistry pays about 45k. I'd like to double that and possibly even triple it. Not really interested in "model and bottle". Not really interested in mcmansions and mercedes.tesoro wrote:Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
I'll get hired either way? That runs contrary to so much that I've been reading about, i.e. that the vast majority of lawyers are having a lot of trouble getting hired. Eve at the t14 I'm hearing that things are getting rough, especially in the lower 3/6.
Another consideration is FPLC -> UNH School of Law. One of the goals of this merger is explicitly stated "Get Pierce's USNWR ranking into the top 100". If Pierce were to be on the rise for the next few years I might be kicking myself for not taking a free ride there while they were still not too difficult to get. Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything.
(When it comes to patent law jobs, btw, this is a purely observational assessment based on anecdotal evidence.)
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
I don't know yet. I may work full time. Ideally I'd go ahead and pass the patent bar and get a job as a patent agent during the day. Or, if Fate really loves me, a job as a patent examiner.bk187 wrote:Though I've heard that FPLC is well-respected for IP, I do not know more than what I've casually read.
How much would you work if went to GULC part-time? How much would you make? Would you want to transfer into their FT when you could?
Assuming I don't get wonderful gigs like that, I'd probably try to transfer into the full time division.
- merichard87

- Posts: 750
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:31 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Engineer here also looking to go into patent law and I would probably go with FP. They far outplace their ranking and have a great IP reputation.
Sidenote: If you graduate in the top third or something you are automatically admitted to the NH Bar. Just an added perk.
Sidenote: If you graduate in the top third or something you are automatically admitted to the NH Bar. Just an added perk.
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Reference? IIRC ~6 students are specially chosen after 1L year to do extra experiential learning and, if they complete all the requirements, are exempt from the NH Bar. I believe it's called the Daniel Websters Scholar program.merichard87 wrote:Engineer here also looking to go into patent law and I would probably go with FP. They far outplace their ranking and have a great IP reputation.
Sidenote: If you graduate in the top third or something you are automatically admitted to the NH Bar. Just an added perk.
- merichard87

- Posts: 750
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:31 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
androstan wrote:Reference? IIRC ~6 students are specially chosen after 1L year to do extra experiential learning and, if they complete all the requirements, are exempt from the NH Bar. I believe it's called the Daniel Websters Scholar program.merichard87 wrote:Engineer here also looking to go into patent law and I would probably go with FP. They far outplace their ranking and have a great IP reputation.
Sidenote: If you graduate in the top third or something you are automatically admitted to the NH Bar. Just an added perk.
Don't know specifics, only what the Asst. Dean told me and she talked about students in a certain percentage of the class but didn't mention a specific program.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
NoJob

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Take the full ride with the following warning.androstan wrote:I guess what I'm asking is, if you had the choice, would you take G-town part time or Franklin Pierce full ride. Assuming a career in patent prep/pros with graduate work in chemistry and undergrad in chemical engineering.
Make sure there is no little clause in your scholarship that mandates a certain academic performance to keep the scholarship, e.g. a certain gpa.
If the gods don't favor you, then you might lose that wonderful scholarship. (There has been some statement on this by the scam bloggers. You should go take a look at them before you accept. Shilling Me Softly or Esquire Never, e.g.)
Imagine having to pay sticker for that law school.
________________________________________
If there is a funky little clause like that, you may want to go with Georgetown. At least, they are stabbing you in the front. In this economy, I would take any job over going to law school.
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Your line of reasoning and concerns is generally true, but your situation is the exception. You're looking to do prep and pro. FPLC basically manufactures IP lawyers. You'll build enough contacts and have enough employer interest to get the job you want, assuming that there is a shortage of chemical engineers in the field (I believe there is). Even if your OCI sucks there will always be the Loyola patent fair (google it or forum search if you're unfamiliar), where you'll probably be searching out your next job anyway.androstan wrote:Money's good, I'd like to make more of it. Turns out that a master's in chemistry pays about 45k. I'd like to double that and possibly even triple it. Not really interested in "model and bottle". Not really interested in mcmansions and mercedes.tesoro wrote:Depends on whether NH is a place where you'd be prone to killing yourself or not. Either one works. How much do you like money? How much do you like location/prestige? You'll get hired either way.
I'll get hired either way? That runs contrary to so much that I've been reading about, i.e. that the vast majority of lawyers are having a lot of trouble getting hired. Eve at the t14 I'm hearing that things are getting rough, especially in the lower 3/6.
Another consideration is FPLC -> UNH School of Law. One of the goals of this merger is explicitly stated "Get Pierce's USNWR ranking into the top 100". If Pierce were to be on the rise for the next few years I might be kicking myself for not taking a free ride there while they were still not too difficult to get. Otoh, maybe the difference between a tier 3 and a top 100 isn't really anything.
The problem with choosing FPLC is you'd better be damn sure that this is the career path you want to follow, because if you get a hard on for tax law or something in the public interest realm down the road, GULC is where you want to be. The question about money pertained to spending $0 versus spending $150,000 on tuition.
One other thing: Prep and pro does not require a JD. Consider working as a patent agent for a year and then reassessing whether there is any purpose in spending your time acquiring one.
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Prep and pro may not require a J.D., but it pays a lot better with a J.D. Also with the J.D. there is at least the option to litigate.
-
bk1

- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Fry cook at McDonald's > YLS, obviously.NoJob wrote:In this economy, I would take any job over going to law school.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Sure. I'm suggesting making sure this is a path you're going to commit to. It's boring, monotonous and often frustrating. Law school opens doors to much more interesting things that might pay substantially less to do and may be more competitive to get into. You might be lured away by different fields. If this is even a possibility, GULC is the choice. If not, you'll be just fine at FPLC.androstan wrote:Prep and pro may not require a J.D., but it pays a lot better with a J.D. Also with the J.D. there is at least the option to litigate.
- nealric

- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Absent some really extenuating personal circumstances, you would be crazy to take FPCL over GULC.
I'm a GULC alum if you have any questions.
I'm a GULC alum if you have any questions.
- 2ofspades

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:42 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Agree with nealric. No affiliation with G'town.nealric wrote:Absent some really extenuating personal circumstances, you would be crazy to take FPCL over GULC.
I'm a GULC alum if you have any questions.
- rayiner

- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Masters in Chem means nothing. You'll be unemployable from FPLC. Even from GULC PT you're not safe for a patent job, though the odds are okay.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- androstan

- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Unemployable? So every almost 150 people graduate from FPLC and don't get a job within a year? Wouldn't old students be warning new students?rayiner wrote:Masters in Chem means nothing. You'll be unemployable from FPLC. Even from GULC PT you're not safe for a patent job, though the odds are okay.
- apper123

- Posts: 981
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Taking FPLC over GULC is insanity.
Disclosure: GULC student <--
Disclosure: GULC student <--
- rayiner

- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
Unemployable for the purposes of IP law. IP shops are all at least midlaw, paying $90-100k on the low end. These places aren't going to be looking for FPLC grads. Hell they're passing over tons of T1 grads ITE.androstan wrote:Unemployable? So every almost 150 people graduate from FPLC and don't get a job within a year? Wouldn't old students be warning new students?rayiner wrote:Masters in Chem means nothing. You'll be unemployable from FPLC. Even from GULC PT you're not safe for a patent job, though the odds are okay.
-
tesoro

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 pm
Re: FPLC full ride vs. G-town PT
I think you're being overly negative. Chem E >>>>> Chem. While there's no boom in the chem industry right now, there are interdisciplinary fields that law firms are prosecuting an increasing number of patents in (think batteries (hybrid cars and smart phones both caused a boom here), semiconductors and broader chemical "systems" areas). Those firms could benefit from a Chem E with a masters in chem.rayiner wrote:Unemployable for the purposes of IP law. IP shops are all at least midlaw, paying $90-100k on the low end. These places aren't going to be looking for FPLC grads. Hell they're passing over tons of T1 grads ITE.androstan wrote:Unemployable? So every almost 150 people graduate from FPLC and don't get a job within a year? Wouldn't old students be warning new students?rayiner wrote:Masters in Chem means nothing. You'll be unemployable from FPLC. Even from GULC PT you're not safe for a patent job, though the odds are okay.
There's a scarcity of engineers in the legal market that causes pretige of school to become secodary, which is the only reason why I think that FPLC is a viable option here. Anecdotally, I know of a manufacturing engineer who graduated just above median from FPLC and has a fine job doing prep and pro, and who claims his classmates fared as well as he did. Obviously you can't use anecdotes on their own to make decisions as big as this, but surely there are more applications to Chem E than Manufacturing E. I'd tell 99% of anyone else to definitely take GULC, but in this one person's case it comes down to how important being debt free and in a city is to him or her because I don't think the choice of school is going to be overly limiting employment wise.
It's possible that I'm misinformed about the chemical market as well, and if so then you might know better than I do.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login