M vs V vs P for corporate law Forum
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:00 am
M vs V vs P for corporate law
Which school has to best reputation/best opportunities for students who want their careers to be in corporate law?
Michigan, Virginia and Penn are very strong schools but I do not know which one has a stronger program for those students who are interested in corporate law (mergers and acquisitions / investment banking to be specific). I do not care about where I end up and I believe all three have about the same national prospects.
Michigan, Virginia and Penn are very strong schools but I do not know which one has a stronger program for those students who are interested in corporate law (mergers and acquisitions / investment banking to be specific). I do not care about where I end up and I believe all three have about the same national prospects.
- nealric
- Posts: 4355
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
They are all about the same. Perhaps a slight edge to P for NYC proximity. Other than that, just go to the school that appeals to you most in terms of location and culture.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
I would say Penn, because you will have better access to bigger job markets. Penn is probably slightly better at landing NY, VA significantly better at DC, and Michigan slightly better at Chicago. Penn will put you in better shape in NYC, and you can always "fall back" on Philly. Go to Penn.phoenixwright83 wrote:Which school has to best reputation/best opportunities for students who want their careers to be in corporate law?
Michigan, Virginia and Penn are very strong schools but I do not know which one has a stronger program for those students who are interested in corporate law (mergers and acquisitions / investment banking to be specific). I do not care about where I end up and I believe all three have about the same national prospects.
I should add, it would help to be so close to NYC too.
Last edited by como on Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:13 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
the one where you graduate with the best grades
- TheBigMediocre
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:53 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Somewhat unrelated, but how hard is it to backdoor into Wharton MBA from Penn Law if you whoop ass your first year?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
These schools are roughly peer schools in corporate law placement. They're so similar that you should base which you attend on other factors (school atmosphere/location, scholarship $$, and so forth). Don't go looking for a huge difference between them in this regard, because it's simply not there.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
While they all are pretty much the same, it depends on which market you want to work in.
However, you said you don't care. Very few people truly don't care.
As you have already stated, they are all national. But legal hiring is not back to what it used to be (and it may never be).
If you want:
East coast = UVA
Midwest = Michigan
Northeast = Penn
While it's not this simple, when not taking into accounting personal preferences and scholarships, it is. These schools will give you the best prospects they have to offer in their home regions (generally). As a result, if your 1L grades were lower (probably under a 3.25 for these schools), you would most likely have your best chances at "corporate law" in the home region of the school.
Keep that in mind.
However, you said you don't care. Very few people truly don't care.
As you have already stated, they are all national. But legal hiring is not back to what it used to be (and it may never be).
If you want:
East coast = UVA
Midwest = Michigan
Northeast = Penn
While it's not this simple, when not taking into accounting personal preferences and scholarships, it is. These schools will give you the best prospects they have to offer in their home regions (generally). As a result, if your 1L grades were lower (probably under a 3.25 for these schools), you would most likely have your best chances at "corporate law" in the home region of the school.
Keep that in mind.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Precisely. This is why I would argue Penn is the place to go. Penn has an equal to better shot at NYC biglaw and pick of the litter in Philly, a large regional market.Aberzombie1892 wrote:As a result, if your 1L grades were lower (probably under a 3.25 for these schools), you would most likely have your best chances at "corporate law" in the home region of the school.
Keep that in mind.
VA is competing big time with other top schools at DC, placing well in NYC, but not better than Penn.
Michigan is second-fiddle in Chicago, and wouldn't be an edge on Penn in NYC.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:12 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
So says the guy at NY's third fiddle. Just kidding, but I think you're overestimating the poor economy's impact on the importance of geographic location with respect to these three schools. The main takeaway is that the difference in corporate law hiring (I'm assuming you mean NY) is negligible for MVP. The only relevance geography has in this situation is where you want to spend the next three years, not where you want to end up, as these schools give you equal shots at NY corporate law.como wrote:Precisely. This is why I would argue Penn is the place to go. Penn has an equal to better shot at NYC biglaw and pick of the litter in Philly, a large regional market.Aberzombie1892 wrote:As a result, if your 1L grades were lower (probably under a 3.25 for these schools), you would most likely have your best chances at "corporate law" in the home region of the school.
Keep that in mind.
VA is competing big time with other top schools at DC, placing well in NYC, but not better than Penn.
Michigan is second-fiddle in Chicago, and wouldn't be an edge on Penn in NYC.
That being said, it would be pretty tight to take a few classes at Wharton, though it won't help in terms of getting hired.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Yea, I'm not really trying to argue that Cornell is comparable to a bunch of schools, but you're right. Third fiddle would be putting it nicely.nedberg wrote:So says the guy at NY's third fiddle. Just kidding, but I think you're overestimating the poor economy's impact on the importance of geographic location with respect to these three schools. The main takeaway is that the difference in corporate law hiring (I'm assuming you mean NY) is negligible for MVP. The only relevance geography has in this situation is where you want to spend the next three years, not where you want to end up, as these schools give you equal shots at NY corporate law.como wrote:Precisely. This is why I would argue Penn is the place to go. Penn has an equal to better shot at NYC biglaw and pick of the litter in Philly, a large regional market.Aberzombie1892 wrote:As a result, if your 1L grades were lower (probably under a 3.25 for these schools), you would most likely have your best chances at "corporate law" in the home region of the school.
Keep that in mind.
VA is competing big time with other top schools at DC, placing well in NYC, but not better than Penn.
Michigan is second-fiddle in Chicago, and wouldn't be an edge on Penn in NYC.
That being said, it would be pretty tight to take a few classes at Wharton, though it won't help in terms of getting hired.
I'm not overestimating the economy's impact. If you're in the top 1/3 of any of those schools, you'll be fine in NY. What I'm saying is, it is a good idea to be conservative ITE. If you're at median at any of those schools, NYC biglaw will not be a sure shot so it helps to also have another large market with relatively little competition.
Trust the guy from a "third fiddle" with no secondary markets to fall back on.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:00 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
I asked this questions because I am applying early decision to one of the three.
Honestly, I really don't care about where I live, at least at this moment, who know maybe I'll change my mind, but I like to move around and would be so excited to go to any of these schools. I wouldn't complain. I am just worried about ED to one over the other and missing my opportunity.
If I do early decision, I don't expect to get much scholarship money and whoever I am accepted to, I am bound to attend.
I was hopping that there was a clear winner, but the answers I've received so far are kind of what I thought. Which makes my decision harder. However the votes are leaning toward Penn.
Does anyone know when their new application cycle starts? I thought I saw Virginia was in Sept. Is that correct?
Honestly, I really don't care about where I live, at least at this moment, who know maybe I'll change my mind, but I like to move around and would be so excited to go to any of these schools. I wouldn't complain. I am just worried about ED to one over the other and missing my opportunity.
If I do early decision, I don't expect to get much scholarship money and whoever I am accepted to, I am bound to attend.
I was hopping that there was a clear winner, but the answers I've received so far are kind of what I thought. Which makes my decision harder. However the votes are leaning toward Penn.
Does anyone know when their new application cycle starts? I thought I saw Virginia was in Sept. Is that correct?
- FlightoftheEarls
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
vanwinkle wrote:These schools are roughly peer schools in corporate law placement. They're so similar that you should base which you attend on other factors (school atmosphere/location, scholarship $$, and so forth). Don't go looking for a huge difference between them in this regard, because it's simply not there.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Penn.
I think the level of increased regionalism ITE is underestimated on this board.
I think the level of increased regionalism ITE is underestimated on this board.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Reedie
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
None of the three of these schools are just "better" at corporate law inmho. Go where there is good "fit" or where you want to live or where you will have the least debt.
-
- Posts: 11444
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
If these three law schools are actual options for you, then your biggest concern should focus on whether you prefer the South, the Midwest or the Northeast for the next three years.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Thank you.rayiner wrote:Penn.
I think the level of increased regionalism ITE is underestimated on this board.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
.
Last edited by drake on Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
As far as peers schools go, Duke and Penn finish well ahead of Virginia in New York. Michigan is a distant fourth and more in line with Cornell than with Duke, Penn, or Virginia.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:13 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
appreqs.comphoenixwright83 wrote: Does anyone know when their new application cycle starts?
- FlightoftheEarls
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Blatant anti-Cornell trolling.quakeroats wrote:As far as peers schools go, Duke and Penn finish well ahead of Virginia in New York. Michigan is a distant fourth and more in line with Cornell than with Duke, Penn, or Virginia.
- como
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Also, where did Duke come into play in this convo? Typical blue devils, dropping by uninvited, putting roofies in the punch and getting kicked out early.FlightoftheEarls wrote:Blatant anti-Cornell trolling.quakeroats wrote:As far as peers schools go, Duke and Penn finish well ahead of Virginia in New York. Michigan is a distant fourth and more in line with Cornell than with Duke, Penn, or Virginia.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Cornell's a fine school. It's just not as fine as the aforementioned.FlightoftheEarls wrote:Blatant anti-Cornell trolling.quakeroats wrote:As far as peers schools go, Duke and Penn finish well ahead of Virginia in New York. Michigan is a distant fourth and more in line with Cornell than with Duke, Penn, or Virginia.
- DelDad
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:26 pm
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Although NY firm placement is pretty similar straight out from school for MVP, I'd give one particular edge to Penn for corporate types interested in a DE Court of Chancery clerkship (which you should at least consider if interested in corporate litigation or even transactional work).
Penn's corporate faculty members are very close to members of the Court of Chancery and Delaware Supreme Court, and several members of Delaware's state and federal judiciary adjunct there). In fact, 4 of the 10 Chancery clerks starting this fall took the same class at Penn with Vice Chancellor Strine in Spring '09.
Penn's corporate faculty members are very close to members of the Court of Chancery and Delaware Supreme Court, and several members of Delaware's state and federal judiciary adjunct there). In fact, 4 of the 10 Chancery clerks starting this fall took the same class at Penn with Vice Chancellor Strine in Spring '09.
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
Remind me of which school produces graduates so skilled in the dark arts of sentence fragmentation.como wrote:Also, where did Duke come into play in this convo? Typical blue devils, dropping by uninvited, putting roofies in the punch and getting kicked out early.FlightoftheEarls wrote:Blatant anti-Cornell trolling.quakeroats wrote:As far as peers schools go, Duke and Penn finish well ahead of Virginia in New York. Michigan is a distant fourth and more in line with Cornell than with Duke, Penn, or Virginia.
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: M vs V vs P for corporate law
They're not as similar as you may think. From what I've seen, Michigan has perhaps half the placement power of Penn in New York.DelDad wrote:Although NY firm placement is pretty similar straight out from school for MVP, I'd give one particular edge to Penn for corporate types interested in a DE Court of Chancery clerkship (which you should at least consider if interested in corporate litigation or even transactional work).
Penn's corporate faculty members are very close to members of the Court of Chancery and Delaware Supreme Court, and several members of Delaware's state and federal judiciary adjunct there). In fact, 4 of the 10 Chancery clerks starting this fall took the same class at Penn with Vice Chancellor Strine in Spring '09.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login