Vandy v. UCLA Forum
-
TEAMYACHT

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 4:15 pm
Vandy v. UCLA
Vandy or UCLA? I do not have a preference as to where in the country I would like to work. I also will be paying sticker at both so a high paying job coming out of school will be important. Additionally, I have always gone to small schools and I tend to well in that environment so Vandy may have the advantage on that front.
I will be attending one of these schools next year.
I will be attending one of these schools next year.
-
TEAMYACHT

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Can I hear your reasoning/thoughts?
- Hiei

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:37 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
The bolded pretty much sealed the deal for Vandy. UCLA doesn't do very well in placing it's graduates outside of LA; Vandy does well with placing it's grads in Atlanta, Tennessee, NYC, DC, Chicago, and Florida.TEAMYACHT wrote:Vandy or UCLA? I do not have a preference as to where in the country I would like to work. I also will be paying sticker at both so a high paying job coming out of school will be important. Additionally, I have always gone to small schools and I tend to well in that environment so Vandy may have the advantage on that front.
I will be attending one of these schools next year.
- Bildungsroman

- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
From what I remember Vanderbilt actually beats Georgetown in BigLaw placement, and generally just kicks ass all over the South.

rad law wrote:Sticker?
Neither.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Roll your eyes all you want, but ITE, nothing is safe.Bildungsroman wrote:From what I remember Vanderbilt actually beats Georgetown in BigLaw placement, and generally just kicks ass all over the South.
rad law wrote:Sticker?
Neither.
- pleasetryagain

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:04 am
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Sticker at Vandy = (~45k tuition/year * 3 years) + (~18k COL/year * 3 years) = ~$189,000 in debt after three years (not including tuition/COL increases).
Monthly Loan Payment: $2,194.45 over 10 yrs at 7%
What kind of job do you plan on getting?
Monthly Loan Payment: $2,194.45 over 10 yrs at 7%
What kind of job do you plan on getting?
-
TEAMYACHT

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
The 18k COL is a non issue and I will not be taking out loans for that amount.
In terms of jobs, I am not sure yet. Certainly my job opportunities will be circumscribed by the loans I will be repaying.
In terms of jobs, I am not sure yet. Certainly my job opportunities will be circumscribed by the loans I will be repaying.
- pleasetryagain

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:04 am
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
I was being slightly sarcastic. Regardless, if $54,000 is a non-issue than you are probably in a financial position to not worry about price. Given your criteria, go to Vandy, do well, profit.TEAMYACHT wrote:The 18k COL is a non issue and I will not be taking out loans for that amount.
In terms of jobs, I am not sure yet. Certainly my job opportunities will be circumscribed by the loans I will be repaying.
-
motiontodismiss

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Vanderbilt. California is a failed state.
- thickfreakness

- Posts: 1055
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
motiontodismiss wrote:Vanderbilt. California is a failed state.
180
-
primusux

- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:02 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
motiontodismiss wrote:Vanderbilt. California is a failed state.
One crisis does not make for a failed state.
-
motiontodismiss

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
However, bankruptcy does.primusux wrote:motiontodismiss wrote:Vanderbilt. California is a failed state.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California
One crisis does not make for a failed state.
Obviously you've not seen the death spiral the CA real estate market's been in since Lehman imploded.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
canuck996

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:14 am
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Terrible advice.rad law wrote:Sticker?
Neither.
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
Thanks for resurrecting this thread to provide this gem.canuck996 wrote:Terrible advice.rad law wrote:Sticker?
Neither.
-
krj02004

- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Re: Vandy v. UCLA
rad law wrote:Thanks for resurrecting this thread to provide this gem.canuck996 wrote:Terrible advice.rad law wrote:Sticker?
Neither.
LOL.
Anyways, Vandy has very special ties to CA for some reason (I was recruited from there and did my interview on campus there). Vandy actually has pretty good placement in CA. I met a lot of Vandy grads when I worked as a paralegal in LA. Very surprising. That said, I'd go to Vandy. My best friend goes to UCLA and if she wasn't in the critical race theory program she would transfer. COL is Westwood is ridiculous. I know you say it doesn't matter, but no sense in wasting money that would go twice as far in Nashville at a peer school.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login