Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent Forum
-
Kobe_Teeth

- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am
Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
Loyola-Chi 18k
Chi-Kent 60k
Chi-Kent 60k
-
nitr0x99

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:10 pm
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
I personally like Loyola a bit more (I'm biased because thats where I'm going
) but you would be STUPID to turn down the much larger scholly at Kent just to go to Loyola. The difference between the two schools in terms of employment prospects are so minimal that it does not make sense to flat out reject $42K in free money
- servinDizzert

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
Kent....seriously? If you cant make this decision, how will you become a successful attorney?
-
Kobe_Teeth

- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
If I don't meet stips. then it turns into 10k a year. Loyola is w/o stipulations.
I agree, its an easy choice. Sorry to bother people.
I agree, its an easy choice. Sorry to bother people.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
nitr0x99

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:10 pm
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
I think those of us on this forum that were considering the T2 Chicago schools (Kent, Loyola, DePaul) should make a club and meet up at a bar once in while to discuss what our schools are like and once we graduate we'll finally be able to solve the mystery of which school places better in ChicagoKobe_Teeth wrote:If I don't meet stips. then it turns into 10k a year. Loyola is w/o stipulations.
I agree, its an easy choice. Sorry to bother people.
-
Kobe_Teeth

- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
haha that would be kinda cool. I'm semi-anxious to meet some TLS'ers in person. I spend way too much time here to not know at least some people!
-
MU10

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 2:37 pm
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
I voted for LUC, but I'm extremely biased as well (headed there in the fall).
I dunno, you can't really beat Loyola's location... facilities and faculty seem pretty solid as well. I never applied to Kent. I did swing by the building, and though it looks nice, I'd much rather be spending three years in the Gold Coast than down in the dark/damp loop (hehe). Location probably doesn't merit ignoring a huge scholarship but meh, just a thought.
I dunno, you can't really beat Loyola's location... facilities and faculty seem pretty solid as well. I never applied to Kent. I did swing by the building, and though it looks nice, I'd much rather be spending three years in the Gold Coast than down in the dark/damp loop (hehe). Location probably doesn't merit ignoring a huge scholarship but meh, just a thought.
-
jelly

- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:32 pm
Re: Loyola-Chi v Chi-Kent
The loop location is an advantage as far as proximity to courts and many law firms. Also, it's more convenient for many commuters. Union Station being across the street is also nice for people who travel. There are also a lot of good and convenient restaurants and other places to eat in the loop.MU10 wrote:I voted for LUC, but I'm extremely biased as well (headed there in the fall).
I dunno, you can't really beat Loyola's location... facilities and faculty seem pretty solid as well. I never applied to Kent. I did swing by the building, and though it looks nice, I'd much rather be spending three years in the Gold Coast than down in the dark/damp loop (hehe). Location probably doesn't merit ignoring a huge scholarship but meh, just a thought.