Berkeley v. Penn Forum
-
nooknak355

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:21 am
Berkeley v. Penn
I'm trying to decide between Berkeley and Penn, and both are at sticker. I'm interested in doing public interest and social justice, but I'm quite torn between the two. Any insights?
- violinst

- Posts: 230
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:23 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Berkeley, without any doubt!
-
nooknak355

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:21 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Berkeley is awesome overall, but I don't know if it provides that much more of a return than Penn for the extra cost that it would be (tuition and COL, not to mention the crazy UC system).
- emilybeth

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:04 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Public interest and social justice? Go to Berkeley, 100%. If you're paying sticker for both, and you're set on PI work, then it's irrelevant cost-wise which you choose: you'll be relying on either school's LRAP and/or federal legislation like the IBR to pay back your loans, and you'll ultimately end up paying back the same amount. Provided, of course, you can find a qualifying PI job. And provided, of course, the school has a supportive LRAP. Berkeley is the better school for both of these considerations.
- Arrow

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:58 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Between the two, I choose Berkeley over Penn, despite my undying love for Penn. I think the difference comes down mostly to where you want to practice. Penn for east, Berkeley for west. Berkeley also does have an amazing public interest program with awesome loan forgiveness. Barring a desire for the east, I would recommend you come join me at Boalt. =P
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
nooknak355

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:21 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
Also, I'm open to practicing in different areas, but I see myself more likely to end up on the East Coast or the Midwest. To make things more complicated, I'm also in at Michigan at sticker with residency but am less enthused about going there.
Also, I'm open to practicing in different areas, but I see myself more likely to end up on the East Coast or the Midwest. To make things more complicated, I'm also in at Michigan at sticker with residency but am less enthused about going there.
- emilybeth

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:04 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Yes, good point. I would look up the list of participating employers at each school's OCI last year. I don't have a list in front of me but I'd wager that the PI employers at Berkeley outnumber the Penn employers. While OCI certainly isn't the only (or best) way to get a PI job, it is a decent barometer for each school.
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
-
nooknak355

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:21 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Without going into too much detail, that's essentially the situation.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
I'm going to be different and suggest Penn because California will self-destruct before your 3 years are up. Besides, Berkley is nucking futs.
- AngryAvocado

- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
FTFYim_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, wealthy parents, or special "clients", you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Berkeley removed the $100k debt ceiling last year.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
-
fortissimo

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
I think you're confusing a floor with a ceiling...They "removed the ceiling" because IBR pays off loans beyond 100k, but you still need at least 100k loans to qualify for LRAP. Something like that.Dignan wrote:Berkeley removed the $100k debt ceiling last year.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
http://www.law.berkeley.edu/194.htmLRAP will grant up to 10 years of support to graduates with more than $100,000 in student loan debt provided that their annual income is no greater than $100,000.
Last edited by fortissimo on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- im_blue

- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
In that case, why not borrow the full COA and let LRAP take care of it?nooknak355 wrote:Without going into too much detail, that's essentially the situation.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
-
fortissimo

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Because with IBR your remaining loans still collect interest...someone can figure out the math, but taking 130k more on loans with 8% interest or whatever if you don't need to sounds questionable. Not sure LRAP benefits > interest accrued, depending on your salary. (Maybe you can try to game the system by taking out 100,001 on loans LOL...although I bet that looks suspicious. And it depends on how much you have saved up. I'd rather not loan if you can b/c the interest rate is so high.)im_blue wrote:In that case, why not borrow the full COA and let LRAP take care of it?nooknak355 wrote:Without going into too much detail, that's essentially the situation.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
Last edited by fortissimo on Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
My mistake. You're right.fortissimo wrote:I think you're confusing a floor with a ceiling...They "removed the ceiling" because IBR pays off loans beyond 100k, but you still need at least 100k loans to qualify for LRAP. Something like that.Dignan wrote:Berkeley removed the $100k debt ceiling last year.im_blue wrote:Unless you have $100k sitting in the bank right now, you're easily going to exceed that minimum.nooknak355 wrote:Wait, but doesn't Boalt have a minimum of 100K in debt in order to be eligible for LRAP funding? I probably wouldn't borrow that much, but enough for it to be a problem for PI.
-
Wooster33

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Penn.
I suggest you visit both places, Berkeley really isn't that nice of a city. A lot of people really dislike the place.
While Berkeley is a great school, it has traditionally placed a very large portion of its class in Cali, so alumni connections are going to be concentrated in a state that I would personally be reluctant to settle in at the moment. On the other hand, the weather is great and if you like San Francisco it's right across the Bay. Also, Penn has a smaller class and that is a bonus for me. Congratulations on both, though! Visit both before you make a decision if you haven't already
As others have said with the new IBR makes the debt in PI not a huge concern, but Berkeley covers whatever little payments you have to make under IBR (when I was looking at their program) as long as you make less than something like $60,000. However, if you are making that little your IBR payment isn't going to be huge in any case (and perhaps Penn has updated their program, I can't speak to theirs at all). I would imagine course offerings for PI at Berkeley are stronger as well.
I suggest you visit both places, Berkeley really isn't that nice of a city. A lot of people really dislike the place.
While Berkeley is a great school, it has traditionally placed a very large portion of its class in Cali, so alumni connections are going to be concentrated in a state that I would personally be reluctant to settle in at the moment. On the other hand, the weather is great and if you like San Francisco it's right across the Bay. Also, Penn has a smaller class and that is a bonus for me. Congratulations on both, though! Visit both before you make a decision if you haven't already
As others have said with the new IBR makes the debt in PI not a huge concern, but Berkeley covers whatever little payments you have to make under IBR (when I was looking at their program) as long as you make less than something like $60,000. However, if you are making that little your IBR payment isn't going to be huge in any case (and perhaps Penn has updated their program, I can't speak to theirs at all). I would imagine course offerings for PI at Berkeley are stronger as well.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Wooster33

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
If you plan on doing the 10 years in public service, however, all outstanding debt is forgiven. If somebody is certain they want to do this, then there is essentially no incentive for living frugally. Just one of many problems with the IBR program.Because with IBR your remaining loans still collect interest...someone can figure out the math, but taking 130k more on loans with 8% interest or whatever if you don't need to sounds questionable. Not sure LRAP benefits > interest accrued, depending on your salary. (Maybe you can try to game the system by taking out 100,001 on loans LOL...although I bet that looks suspicious. And it depends on how much you have saved up. I'd rather not loan if you can b/c the interest rate is so high.)
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Wooster33 wrote:Penn.
I suggest you visit both places, Berkeley really isn't that nice of a city. A lot of people really dislike the place.
A lot of people really dislike Philly as well. I'd much rather go to law school in Berkeley than Philly, but this is a personal matter. As Wooster suggests, you should visit both cities.
While Berkeley is a great school, it has traditionally placed a very large portion of its class in Cali, so alumni connections are going to be concentrated in a state that I would personally be reluctant to settle in at the moment.
I've seen this argument a lot, and I'm a little puzzled by it. The California budget crisis is getting a lot of attention, but the state of New York--which is Penn's primary market--isn't faring much better. New York is also facing its worst state budget since the Great Depression. And NYC is in all kinds of financial trouble.
Don't get me wrong: California is in bad shape. But so are lots of states in this country, particularly in the East. And, long-term, I have a little more confidence in the West Coast tech sector than I do in the East Coast financial sector. It's a risk to tie yourself to any region right now, but I don't think that Penn is any more "national" than Berkeley, and I don't think that the East Coast is necessarily a better long-term bet than the West Coast.
-
fortissimo

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
Uh you'd still have to pay loans off (while collecting interest) during the 10 years........versus not having loans to pay off during the 10 years if you don't take on as much debt.Wooster33 wrote:If you plan on doing the 10 years in public service, however, all outstanding debt is forgiven. If somebody is certain they want to do this, then there is essentially no incentive for living frugally. Just one of many problems with the IBR program.Because with IBR your remaining loans still collect interest...someone can figure out the math, but taking 130k more on loans with 8% interest or whatever if you don't need to sounds questionable. Not sure LRAP benefits > interest accrued, depending on your salary. (Maybe you can try to game the system by taking out 100,001 on loans LOL...although I bet that looks suspicious. And it depends on how much you have saved up. I'd rather not loan if you can b/c the interest rate is so high.)
As for the CA v. NYC market argument. Unless you're going to pursue IP I don't see how the tech sector has any relevance for law. Also, NYC is still going to be the legal and financial capital of America for pretty much forever. Its legal market is faring better right now than CA markets and is easier to break into.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
OTOH, ten T14 law schools target NYC as their primary market while only two T14s target California. I don't think that the CA market is hard to break into for a Berkeley Law graduate.fortissimo wrote:Uh you'd still have to pay loans off (while collecting interest) during the 10 years........versus not having loans to pay off during the 10 years if you don't take on as much debt.Wooster33 wrote:If you plan on doing the 10 years in public service, however, all outstanding debt is forgiven. If somebody is certain they want to do this, then there is essentially no incentive for living frugally. Just one of many problems with the IBR program.Because with IBR your remaining loans still collect interest...someone can figure out the math, but taking 130k more on loans with 8% interest or whatever if you don't need to sounds questionable. Not sure LRAP benefits > interest accrued, depending on your salary. (Maybe you can try to game the system by taking out 100,001 on loans LOL...although I bet that looks suspicious. And it depends on how much you have saved up. I'd rather not loan if you can b/c the interest rate is so high.)
As for the CA v. NYC market argument. Unless you're going to pursue IP I don't see how the tech sector has any relevance for law. Also, NYC is still going to be the legal and financial capital of America for pretty much forever. Its legal market is faring better right now than CA markets and is easier to break into.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Strangelove

- Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
I hate Berkeley because it's such a GPA-snob school.
However, I'd say go for Berkeley anyway.. I'm just jealous because I won't get in even if I get a 180...
However, I'd say go for Berkeley anyway.. I'm just jealous because I won't get in even if I get a 180...
-
fortissimo

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
I think it's the plurality for many of the t14, but not the majority for many of them. These schools split their grads among Chicago, DC, and NYC and believe it or not, quite a few head out West. And fwiw, the NYC market is still at least 5 times bigger than SF and something like at least 3 times bigger than LA's. Ask any current 2L though. NYC is in better shape.Dignan wrote:OTOH, ten T14 law schools target NYC as their primary market while only two T14s target California. I don't think that the CA market is hard to break into for a Berkeley Law graduate.fortissimo wrote:Uh you'd still have to pay loans off (while collecting interest) during the 10 years........versus not having loans to pay off during the 10 years if you don't take on as much debt.Wooster33 wrote:If you plan on doing the 10 years in public service, however, all outstanding debt is forgiven. If somebody is certain they want to do this, then there is essentially no incentive for living frugally. Just one of many problems with the IBR program.Because with IBR your remaining loans still collect interest...someone can figure out the math, but taking 130k more on loans with 8% interest or whatever if you don't need to sounds questionable. Not sure LRAP benefits > interest accrued, depending on your salary. (Maybe you can try to game the system by taking out 100,001 on loans LOL...although I bet that looks suspicious. And it depends on how much you have saved up. I'd rather not loan if you can b/c the interest rate is so high.)
As for the CA v. NYC market argument. Unless you're going to pursue IP I don't see how the tech sector has any relevance for law. Also, NYC is still going to be the legal and financial capital of America for pretty much forever. Its legal market is faring better right now than CA markets and is easier to break into.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
So, why are so many East Coasters headed out into the crappy West Coast legal market?fortissimo wrote:I think it's the plurality for many of the t14, but not the majority for many of them. These schools split their grads among Chicago, DC, and NYC and believe it or not, quite a few head out West.Dignan wrote:OTOH, ten T14 law schools target NYC as their primary market while only two T14s target California. I don't think that the CA market is hard to break into for a Berkeley Law graduate.fortissimo wrote: As for the CA v. NYC market argument. Unless you're going to pursue IP I don't see how the tech sector has any relevance for law. Also, NYC is still going to be the legal and financial capital of America for pretty much forever. Its legal market is faring better right now than CA markets and is easier to break into.
-
fortissimo

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Berkeley v. Penn
We're talking about grads right, not necessarily where people are from. Maybe they are West Coasters who decided to choose Columbia or Chicago, etc. ? I don't really know that many, tbh I don't know any, East Coasters who plan on migrating to the West Coast for the first time after law school. Regardless, their grades still probably have to be better for SF biglaw than NYC biglaw since it is a much tinier market. OP wants PI though...so whatever, but she does want PI on the East Coast.Dignan wrote:I think it's the plurality for many of the t14, but not the majority for many of them. These schools split their grads among Chicago, DC, and NYC and believe it or not, quite a few head out West./quote]fortissimo wrote:Dignan wrote:OTOH, ten T14 law schools target NYC as their primary market while only two T14s target California. I don't think that the CA market is hard to break into for a Berkeley Law graduate.fortissimo wrote: As for the CA v. NYC market argument. Unless you're going to pursue IP I don't see how the tech sector has any relevance for law. Also, NYC is still going to be the legal and financial capital of America for pretty much forever. Its legal market is faring better right now than CA markets and is easier to break into.
So, why are so many East Coasters headed out into the crappy West Coast legal market?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login