WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k Forum
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm
WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I was all but committed to Michigan until I got the email an hour ago from WashU. Now, things are complicated.
Not 100% sure yet what I want my career to be after law school.
Not 100% sure yet what I want my career to be after law school.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I got a similar scholarship from WUSTL. I'm planning to take Michigan sticker, FWIW.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:35 am
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Same WashU offer, looking at Michigan sticker. Can't do law school for sticker. I'm planning to visit and see what I think.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:54 am
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I had the same decision to make last year (I actually created an identical thread about it) and chose Michigan.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
IMO Michigan is definitely the best option here, no question. FWIW, I've spoken with recent WUSTL grads. Definitely scared me away.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Sauer Grapes
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
....
Last edited by Sauer Grapes on Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Ehhhh, even if you want to do something like public interest or government, Michigan would be the better option IMO. Academia would be a no-brainer as well. And it's not like you're stuck in biglaw the rest of your life. Go to the better school, work biglaw for a few years, pay off your debt, and enjoy many more open doors down the road with the much more prestigious degree.Sauer Grapes wrote:I think it depends on your situation. If you want biglaw, go with UMich. If you don't want biglaw, or you want to be in MO, go WashU.
- scribelaw
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Michigan all day long.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Yeah, I'm leaning with you guys on this one. Also, even though I'm a New Yorker and St. Louis is more of a "major
city, Ann Arbor seems more appealing to me.
city, Ann Arbor seems more appealing to me.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Yeah, and the change of pace might be nice. AA is a great place. Mich puts more grads in NYC than the entire Midwest combined (certainly can't say that about WUSTL). IMO, the flexibility of a Mich degree is pretty invaluable thing to have.goodolgil wrote:Yeah, I'm leaning with you guys on this one. Also, even though I'm a New Yorker and St. Louis is more of a "major
city, Ann Arbor seems more appealing to me.
- jawsthegreat
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:51 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I know a WUSTL 3L that graduated from my college and is in the top 10%.
He has no job.
He has no job.
-
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
If it was WUSTL with 120K vs. Michigan at sticker, I'd say WUSTL. But I think the 45K at Michigan makes it a good choice, and the one I'd go with.
- scribelaw
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Even at sticker, I'd say Michigan, absent special circumstances (family connections, reason to live in St. Louis). There's no comparing the two schools and I'd be worried about WUSTL and trying to compete for scraps from the Chicago market with about six other good law schools ITE.dakatz wrote:If it was WUSTL with 120K vs. Michigan at sticker, I'd say WUSTL. But I think the 45K at Michigan makes it a good choice, and the one I'd go with.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:51 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
similar scholarship from WUSTl, but I am tentatively taking Boalt at sticker
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I've had pretty much the same experiences talking with other WUSTL grads. I think people tend to overestimate the school because of its USNWR spot and possibly its UG + medical school. It's not really significantly different than ND, UIUC, or GWU.jawsthegreat wrote:I know a WUSTL 3L that graduated from my college and is in the top 10%.
He has no job.
Also +1 to the dude who said that Mich at full price > WUSTL with free tuition.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Hey, I said it first, and I'm putting my money where my mouth is! But seriously, I'll see you all at Michigan.Helmholtz wrote:I've had pretty much the same experiences talking with other WUSTL grads. I think people tend to overestimate the school because of its USNWR spot and possibly its UG + medical school. It's not really significantly different than ND, UIUC, or GWU.jawsthegreat wrote:I know a WUSTL 3L that graduated from my college and is in the top 10%.
He has no job.
Also +1 to the dude who said that Mich at full price > WUSTL with free tuition.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:08 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Michigan would be clear winner even at 2x full tuition vs Woostle free w/a complementary GF (level 9) experience for three years each night after class. Michigan. Choose Michigan.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- roxj
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:09 am
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
Keep in mind that COL in the lawyers club is under 11k/yr, so the 45k is your cost of living covered.
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
I am always intrigued by this comment. I don't feel this way, and it's not like I have any money saved up or any secret way of paying for law school.gmichaelbluth wrote:Same WashU offer, looking at Michigan sticker. Can't do law school for sticker. I'm planning to visit and see what I think.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
But that's just room and board, right? Usually when schools quote COL (i.e. Michigan quotes 17.5k), it also includes books, transportation, health insurance, etc.roxj wrote:Keep in mind that COL in the lawyers club is under 11k/yr, so the 45k is your cost of living covered.
But either way, yes...Michigan is the choice!
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:19 pm
Re: WUSTL with 120k (no strings) vs Michigan with 45k
$45k, while it doesn't seem like much compared to $120k, it still a 1/3 tuition scholarship. Unless you absolutely knew you wanted to work in Missouri for the next 5-10 years, turning down Michigan for $75k really doesn't make sense. That $75k could easily be made up in 1-2 year after graduation given the prospects coming out of both schools, and after that Michigan's edge would be pure profit...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login