New Placement data: UNC? Forum
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:06 pm
New Placement data: UNC?
Here is the 2005 nlj chart: http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414empl ... trends.pdf
Here is the discussion of nlj+ fed clerkship stats (scroll down to see numbers on lower ranked schools): http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=108528
Looks like UNC has dropped 7-10% or so. Meanwhile, many other schools remained consistent. Wake even increased about 10%.
I really don't want to make too much of this but I thought UNC would place better than 16% into nlj +fed clerkships. Anyone have thoughts?
Here is the discussion of nlj+ fed clerkship stats (scroll down to see numbers on lower ranked schools): http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=108528
Looks like UNC has dropped 7-10% or so. Meanwhile, many other schools remained consistent. Wake even increased about 10%.
I really don't want to make too much of this but I thought UNC would place better than 16% into nlj +fed clerkships. Anyone have thoughts?
- GeePee
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
NLJ stats aren't really that indicative for a school which takes an insane amount of in-state students in a state that has extremely few NLJ250 firms. If you're going to UNC, you're probably looking for a good job in NC; hence, the NLJ numbers are low.belkin00 wrote:Here is the 2005 nlj chart: http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414empl ... trends.pdf
Here is the discussion of nlj+ fed clerkship stats (scroll down to see numbers on lower ranked schools): http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=108528
Looks like UNC has dropped 7-10% or so. Meanwhile, many other schools remained consistent. Wake even increased about 10%.
I really don't want to make too much of this but I thought UNC would place better than 16% into nlj +fed clerkships. Anyone have thoughts?
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:06 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
There still remains a 10% decline between the two charts while other schools that have large in-state pops (UGA) have remained consistent or increased.
- jss1100
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 6:25 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
This does have me a bit concerned. I am deciding between UNC and Wake at the same price. I lean towards UNC partly because of geographical location but career outcomes are very important.


-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:07 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
not sure what i'm looking for. but i'll Bump regardless.
Anything to make the UNC vs. Wake decision easier?
Anything to make the UNC vs. Wake decision easier?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
I don't know what you are looking for.women'ssoccer wrote:not sure what i'm looking for. but i'll Bump regardless.
Anything to make the UNC vs. Wake decision easier?
If scholarships make Wake cheaper than UNC, choose Wake.
If scholarships make them the same price, it's a toss up.
If scholarships make UNC cheaper than Wake......personal preference?
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:07 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
Aberzombie1892 wrote:I don't know what you are looking for.women'ssoccer wrote:not sure what i'm looking for. but i'll Bump regardless.
Anything to make the UNC vs. Wake decision easier?
If scholarships make Wake cheaper than UNC, choose Wake.
If scholarships make them the same price, it's a toss up.
If scholarships make UNC cheaper than Wake......personal preference?
perfect...by this most eloquently worded set of conditionals, i find myself with toss-up status.

-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:38 pm
Re: New Placement data: UNC?
Don't know why people refuse to believe it but THEY PLACE ALMOST THE SAME (especially in state). its all about your personal preference or $$$ at that point.