yrrjy Forum
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:10 am
- nsideirish
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am
Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW
Are you saying that Illinois is giving you 10k a year or that it will cost you 10k a year? And same question for the other schools.
- Joga Bonito
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:46 pm
Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW
GW & DC all they way for this. Plus GW will have the best placement nationwide but then there are like 500 something people in a first year class too so I don't know.phillbert0087 wrote:Just seeing what you all think. Illinois (10k a year), Cardozo (40k a year) or GW (35k a year). I am a little unsure about what kind of law to practice but I am leaning toward International, Constitutional or PI... and I don't mind if I go Big Law or not... just want enough money to maintain my family and goo employment prospects, hopefully nationwide.
Let me know what you think... every comment is helpful! I am still waiting on some more law schools, this are just top 3 as of now.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW
The figures are the scholarships awarded. Thanks for pointing that out!
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW
The cheaper between UIUC and GW.
- Great Satchmo
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:34 pm
Re: Illinois v. Cardozo v. GW
If GW is offering $35k a year, I'd definitely go that direction.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login