GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride) Forum
-
voxclamantis

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:40 pm
GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
I'm mainly interested in Urban Issues and Affordable Housing/Economic Development, but more generally in Public Policy. I know it's early, I'm just curious!
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Shouldn't even be a debate here. Do not go 200K into debt when you can go to school for free.
- World B. Free

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:34 am
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
dozo... it's free
-
yourdadcalled

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:31 am
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
i think it would be an excellent idea to go 200K into debt to pursue affordable housing law.
- PDaddy

- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
No brainer dude. Cardozo is actually a good law school, it's just in a saturated market. But the risk-reward analysis says to do the 'Dozo, don't be a Bozo.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FunkyJD

- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
TITFCRyourdadcalled wrote:i think it would be an excellent idea to go 200K into debt to pursue affordable housing law.
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Scholarship requirements for Cardozo?
- vanwinkle

- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
I voted for Cardozo, but this is a valid question.Helmholtz wrote:Scholarship requirements for Cardozo?
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Could be some of Dozo's bullshit section-stacking, top X% of class required stuff they try to pull.vanwinkle wrote:I voted for Cardozo, but this is a valid question.Helmholtz wrote:Scholarship requirements for Cardozo?
- vanwinkle

- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Yeah, so I've heard. I have no firsthand experience in this since the bastards WL'd me.Helmholtz wrote:Could be some of Dozo's bullshit section-stacking, top X% of class required stuff they try to pull.vanwinkle wrote:I voted for Cardozo, but this is a valid question.Helmholtz wrote:Scholarship requirements for Cardozo?
- UFMatt

- Posts: 404
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:59 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Is there nothing in between? If you applied to GW for practicing in DC, you could consider W&M. They're pretty generous and are close enough to DC for summer employment.
I voted for Cardozo, given the type of law that you want to practice, assuming their scholarship requirements aren't brutal. GW is expensive, especially when you consider CoL in DC.
I voted for Cardozo, given the type of law that you want to practice, assuming their scholarship requirements aren't brutal. GW is expensive, especially when you consider CoL in DC.
- sirchristaylor

- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:33 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
I've heard that Cardozo closes down the school during the sabbath... maybe I could[strike]n't[/strike] live with that[strike], personally[/strike].
Last edited by sirchristaylor on Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
doopwooper

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:15 pm
Re: GW vs. Cardozo (Full Ride)
Cardozo is a good school and I think it would be more worthwhile to go there for free rather than pay an estimated 69,000 a year at GW whose ranking isn't phenomenal.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login