Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
2013 Rankings Forum
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
- Dignan
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
These kinds of random jumps and drops happen every year. There are always a few schools that jump 10-20 spots. If there's "nonsense" here, it's the same kind of nonsense that we see every year from USNWR.omninode wrote:US News totally jumped the shark this year. I don't know how anyone can see such drastic shifts and think the rankings still have value. I mean, no offense to the University of Washington, but a jump from 30 to 20 in one year? I just don't buy it. That's just one example of the nonsense found throughout this list.
- JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Hmmm... I realize there's almost always a tie at 7 or 8, followed by a drop to 10 or 11, but Michigan's managed to never drop to 10 before (please correct me if I'm wrong). Even though the ranking really don't mean shit (still happily going), I bet the admissions office has to be a bit concerned.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Because the rank is the only reason somebody would make that decision. Far more important than employment statistics, cost of living, or scholarships.Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
UT is the same school it was a year ago. On par with Vandy and UCLA. While it has been competitive with T14's in terms of clerkships, it has never matched up in terms of NLJ250 placement. It's raw score of 77 last year is the same this year and not too much has changed in its stats (slightly lower GPA median and placement, same LSAT median (though they managed a point higher on 75th%).Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
I really like UT, but I really never got the excitement from last year. The school didn't magically become on par with a different group of schools overnight. If it got out of state people to attend at sticker over better options for their career goals, than that was stupid. If it convinced instate people to turn down something like DCNG at sticker (with the intent to come back to Texas), then it probably saved some people from themselves.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Are you dumb?lisjjen wrote:Because the rank is the only reason somebody would make that decision. Far more important than employment statistics, cost of living, or scholarships.Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
- turkishswat
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:34 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
I know. It stung me too.Dany wrote:Are you dumb?lisjjen wrote:Because the rank is the only reason somebody would make that decision. Far more important than employment statistics, cost of living, or scholarships.Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Read the quote I was responding to you fucking retard.lisjjen wrote:Because the rank is the only reason somebody would make that decision. Far more important than employment statistics, cost of living, or scholarships.Desert Fox wrote:I don't. They were idiots.Eliyahu7 wrote:I feel sorry for anyone who went to Texas because of ranked 14 last year...
-
- Posts: 1902
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
The Real T14:
1 Kentucky (61)
2 Syracuse (1)
3 Missouri (2)
4 North Carolina (1)
5 Michigan State
6 Kansas
7 Ohio State
8 Duke
9 Baylor
10 Florida State
11 Marquette
12 Murray State
13 Michigan
14 Wisconsin
Source: ESPN
1 Kentucky (61)
2 Syracuse (1)
3 Missouri (2)
4 North Carolina (1)
5 Michigan State
6 Kansas
7 Ohio State
8 Duke
9 Baylor
10 Florida State
11 Marquette
12 Murray State
13 Michigan
14 Wisconsin
Source: ESPN
-
- Posts: 1902
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Columbia doesn't have a basketball team bro....
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
sparty99 wrote:Columbia doesn't have a basketball team bro....
They'd need to start letting in a lot more URMs before that could happen.
- Antilles Haven
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:34 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
137Jaeger wrote:sparty99 wrote:Columbia doesn't have a basketball team bro....
They'd need to start letting in a lot more URMs before that could happen.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Wow.Desert Fox wrote: Read the quote I was responding to you fucking retard.
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:21 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Harvard @ 3? That's Linsane.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Desert Fox can no longer say T13.
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Is it OK to reference Michigan's fall to 10 when I withdraw this week?
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Tom Joad wrote:Is it OK to reference Michigan's fall to 10 when I withdraw this week?
I hope you do.
Does anyone have access to the USNWR Law Firms Rank Schools section?
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:59 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Does anyone know how Harvard is ranked below Stanford???
In terms of actual employment placement (A3 clerkships, NLJ250 numbers etc) and other factors it's not absurd to have Stanford ahead of Harvard (they are peer schools), but I don't understand how it happened given the actual criteria USNWR uses.
- I can't imagine Stanford got higher scores in the Peer Assessment and Lawyer/Judge Assessment than Harvard. Harvard is Harvard and as such usually ties with Yale for the highest scores in these, right? As far as I know, Harvard actually always ends up ahead in Peer Assessment and equal in Lawyer/Judge Assessment.
- Harvard has a higher median LSAT and median GPA than Stanford.
- It doesn't count for much, but Harvard has the most library volumes by far.
Together, these things amount to more than half the weighting of the rankings.
- Meanwhile, Stanford has a lower acceptance rate, but they are close enough and it is weighted little enough that that shouldn't actually matter (and besides, it was true last year too)
- I think Stanford gets higher Bar Passage scores just because the CA bar is so hard. Again, though, it's worth very very little and the difference isn't high.
- As far as I can tell, they usually have about the same spending per student (despite Harvard's larger size), although that might have changed this year.
Did Stanford just end up ahead this year because of employment numbers at graduation/9-months? It seems like that's just statistical noise and probably shouldn't overcome higher reputation/LSAT/GPA. Ah well.
In terms of actual employment placement (A3 clerkships, NLJ250 numbers etc) and other factors it's not absurd to have Stanford ahead of Harvard (they are peer schools), but I don't understand how it happened given the actual criteria USNWR uses.
- I can't imagine Stanford got higher scores in the Peer Assessment and Lawyer/Judge Assessment than Harvard. Harvard is Harvard and as such usually ties with Yale for the highest scores in these, right? As far as I know, Harvard actually always ends up ahead in Peer Assessment and equal in Lawyer/Judge Assessment.
- Harvard has a higher median LSAT and median GPA than Stanford.
- It doesn't count for much, but Harvard has the most library volumes by far.
Together, these things amount to more than half the weighting of the rankings.
- Meanwhile, Stanford has a lower acceptance rate, but they are close enough and it is weighted little enough that that shouldn't actually matter (and besides, it was true last year too)
- I think Stanford gets higher Bar Passage scores just because the CA bar is so hard. Again, though, it's worth very very little and the difference isn't high.
- As far as I can tell, they usually have about the same spending per student (despite Harvard's larger size), although that might have changed this year.
Did Stanford just end up ahead this year because of employment numbers at graduation/9-months? It seems like that's just statistical noise and probably shouldn't overcome higher reputation/LSAT/GPA. Ah well.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
After the nlj I think we gotta go T11. Michigone, Gulac Law Concentration Center and Suny-Ithaca are out.johansantana21 wrote:Desert Fox can no longer say T13.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Is there a question here?lessthanjake wrote:Does anyone know how Harvard is ranked below Stanford???
In terms of actual employment placement (A3 clerkships, NLJ250 numbers etc) and other factors it's not absurd to have Stanford ahead of Harvard (they are peer schools), but I don't understand how it happened given the actual criteria USNWR uses.
- I can't imagine Stanford got higher scores in the Peer Assessment and Lawyer/Judge Assessment than Harvard. Harvard is Harvard and as such usually ties with Yale for the highest scores in these, right? As far as I know, Harvard actually always ends up ahead in Peer Assessment and equal in Lawyer/Judge Assessment.
- Harvard has a higher median LSAT and median GPA than Stanford.
- It doesn't count for much, but Harvard has the most library volumes by far.
Together, these things amount to more than half the weighting of the rankings.
- Meanwhile, Stanford has a lower acceptance rate, but they are close enough and it is weighted little enough that that shouldn't actually matter (and besides, it was true last year too)
- I think Stanford gets higher Bar Passage scores just because the CA bar is so hard. Again, though, it's worth very very little and the difference isn't high.
- As far as I can tell, they usually have about the same spending per student (despite Harvard's larger size), although that might have changed this year.
Did Stanford just end up ahead this year because of employment numbers at graduation/9-months? It seems like that's just statistical noise and probably shouldn't overcome higher reputation/LSAT/GPA. Ah well.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Desert Fox wrote:After the nlj I think we gotta go T11. Michigone, Gulac Law Concentration Center and Suny-Ithaca are out.johansantana21 wrote:Desert Fox can no longer say T13.
Zing!
- johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Desert Fox wrote:After the nlj I think we gotta go T11. Michigone, Gulac Law Concentration Center and Suny-Ithaca are out.johansantana21 wrote:Desert Fox can no longer say T13.
But Michigone isn't ranked between 12-14

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login