Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015) Forum

Yukos · Post by **Yukos** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:54 pm

hunter.d wrote:
minnbills wrote:
hunter.d wrote:I think this is brand new, correct me if you guys already caught.

Georgetown

LSAT: 165(-2)/ 169 (-1) / 170 (-1)

GPA: 3.43 (-.01)/ 3.73 (+.01) /3.82 (+01)

That 25th LSAT took a beating. 2011 entering it was at 169
lolol should have cut dat class size more, it is a degree mill after all.
My math could be wrong but I think less students means less people paying tuition......

Gotta maintain that sick faculty.

minnbills · Post by **minnbills** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:56 pm

hunter.d wrote:
minnbills wrote:
hunter.d wrote:I think this is brand new, correct me if you guys already caught.

Georgetown

LSAT: 165(-2)/ 169 (-1) / 170 (-1)

GPA: 3.43 (-.01)/ 3.73 (+.01) /3.82 (+01)

That 25th LSAT took a beating. 2011 entering it was at 169
lolol should have cut dat class size more, it is a degree mill after all.
My math could be wrong but I think less students means less people paying tuition......

Wrong. Just charge higher tuition.

071816 · Post by **071816** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:59 pm

minnbills wrote:
hunter.d wrote:
minnbills wrote:
hunter.d wrote:I think this is brand new, correct me if you guys already caught.

Georgetown

LSAT: 165(-2)/ 169 (-1) / 170 (-1)

GPA: 3.43 (-.01)/ 3.73 (+.01) /3.82 (+01)

That 25th LSAT took a beating. 2011 entering it was at 169
lolol should have cut dat class size more, it is a degree mill after all.
My math could be wrong but I think less students means less people paying tuition......
Wrong. Just charge higher tuition.

reading comp fail

minnbills · Post by **minnbills** » Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:03 pm

chimp wrote: reading comp fail

Just saying; wasn't directly responding to your post, bro

HBBJohnStamos · Post by **HBBJohnStamos** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:52 pm

The fact that you called his post "wrong" sort of implies that you were responding to it.

sconnielaw13 · Post by **sconnielaw13** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:10 pm

justonemoregame · Post by **justonemoregame** » Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:54 pm

Samford

151 (-2) / 153 (-2) / 158 (+1)

Enrollment: total is 424 for all three classes, the last two were 166 and 152, so that leaves 106, plus anyone from previous classes who withdrew; they probably dropped around 20/25 students this year.

iMisto · Post by **iMisto** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:31 am

justonemoregame wrote:Samford

151 (-2) / 153 (-2) / 158 (+1)

Enrollment: total is 424 for all three classes, the last two were 166 and 152, so that leaves 106, plus anyone from previous classes who withdrew; they probably dropped around 20/25 students this year.

1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: No... Samford.

Tiago Splitter · Post by **Tiago Splitter** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:09 pm

iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh

iMisto · Post by **iMisto** » Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:33 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh

HAHAHAHAHAHA! omg, too funny.

Real Madrid · Post by **Real Madrid** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:22 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh

lol. I saw something similar in a "Choosing a Law School" thread where someone said something along the lines of, "Go to Samford and hope other people think you said Stanford."

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:24 pm

Real Madrid wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh

lol. I saw something similar in a "Choosing a Law School" thread where someone said something along the lines of, "Go to Samford and hope other people think you said Stanford."[/quote]

TITCR if someone won't retake

CardinalLaw · Post by **CardinalLaw** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:56 pm

TheThriller wrote:
Real Madrid wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh
lol. I saw something similar in a "Choosing a Law School" thread where someone said something along the lines of, "Go to Samford and hope other people think you said Stanford."[/quote]

TITCR if someone won't retake

Just like going to New York Law School might make people think you went to NYU.

HarlandBassett · Post by **HarlandBassett** » Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:36 pm

Real Madrid wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
iMisto wrote: 1: Where do you go to school?
2: Samford.
1: Ohhh, Stanford?
2: ~~No... Samford.~~Uh-huh
lol. I saw something similar in a "Choosing a Law School" thread where someone said something along the lines of, "Go to Samford and hope other people think you said Stanford."

that is a running gag since the Havard / Haverford days

Lord Randolph McDuff · Post by **Lord Randolph McDuff** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:58 pm

Admissions officers that deserve cookies: (improved class matrices despite shitty environment)

Wake
UVA
USC
Nebraska (both medians)
Houston
CU
Berkeley * should probably be omitted bc they don't seem to give a fuck
Marquette
Louisville
Temple
San Diego

Prolly left one or two out. A far cry from these numbers from just last year.

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:59 pm

GIVE ME MEDIANS

Lord Randolph McDuff · Post by **Lord Randolph McDuff** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:10 pm

Utah

160, 3.61

Sorry don't know if this is good or bad news for them. Methinks it is bad.

20130312 · Post by **20130312** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:11 pm

TheThriller wrote:GIVE ME MEDIANS

OR GIVE ME DEATH

TheThriller · Post by **TheThriller** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:12 pm

InGoodFaith wrote:
TheThriller wrote:GIVE ME MEDIANS
OR GIVE ME DEATH

YOU CAN TAKE MY EYES BUT YOU CAN NEVER TAKE MY MEDIANS

ajax · Post by **ajax** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:23 pm

Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Admissions officers that deserve cookies: (improved class matrices despite shitty environment)

Wake
UVA
USC
Nebraska (both medians)
Houston
CU
Berkeley * should probably be omitted bc they don't seem to give a fuck
Marquette
Louisville
Temple
San Diego

Prolly left one or two out. A far cry from these numbers from just last year.

Or deserve handcuffs. After Illinois/Villanova I'm finding it hard to trust any of the schools out there.

Tiago Splitter · Post by **Tiago Splitter** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:29 pm

ajax wrote:
Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Admissions officers that deserve cookies: (improved class matrices despite shitty environment)

Wake
UVA
USC
Nebraska (both medians)
Houston
CU
Berkeley * should probably be omitted bc they don't seem to give a fuck
Marquette
Louisville
Temple
San Diego

Prolly left one or two out. A far cry from these numbers from just last year.
Or deserve handcuffs. After Illinois/Villanova I'm finding it hard to trust any of the schools out there.

Definitely. It's also not so impressive when you have to cut your class 10-20% to get the same medians. Looking at you USD.

Huskies13! · Post by **Huskies13!** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:36 pm

As far as I know, only ASU and Iowa (among schools in the top 50) went up in both medians... W&L deserves some "props" for going up 50% in enrollment and NOT dropping in LSAT.

052220151 · Post by **052220151** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:50 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
ajax wrote:
Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Admissions officers that deserve cookies: (improved class matrices despite shitty environment)

Wake
UVA
USC
Nebraska (both medians)
Houston
CU
Berkeley * should probably be omitted bc they don't seem to give a fuck
Marquette
Louisville
Temple
San Diego

Prolly left one or two out. A far cry from these numbers from just last year.
Or deserve handcuffs. After Illinois/Villanova I'm finding it hard to trust any of the schools out there.
Definitely. It's also not so impressive when you have to cut your class 10-20% to get the same medians. Looking at you USD.

In their defense, they hired a new dean who said before hand he wanted to cut the size of the class because the school was too big.

052220151 · Post by **052220151** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:24 pm

Where are NU medians?!

rayiner · Post by **rayiner** » Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:32 pm

deputydog wrote:Where are NU medians?!

168/3.7

Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015) Forum

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Register for access!

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Register now!

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?