2014 Rankings Released Forum
- TTRansfer

- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
What is the raw score for GW?
-
Wakelaw15

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
pedestrian wrote:Yes, and sadly there is no way to explain that you are "as good as the ivies" without sounding like a Tufts UG.justwalkawayrenee wrote:Chicago ties Columbia, and still most of America probably thinks we're a community college.
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
- TTRansfer

- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!!Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Got you covered broTTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
-
hephaestus

- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
LolWakelaw15 wrote:Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.
- TTRansfer

- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
LOL @ Pitt's epic 22 spot slide. Now tied with WVU. That should help the rivalry there. LULZ.
- jay115

- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?
-
mb9113

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:13 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Top two choices tied this year.
Now I can--with absolutely no pretense-- say that rankings play will no role in my decision.
I WON, US NEWS.
Now I can--with absolutely no pretense-- say that rankings play will no role in my decision.
I WON, US NEWS.
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the futurealwayssunnyinfl wrote:FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
- Poo-T

- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
yay!!!TTRansfer wrote:Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!!Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.
- JCougar

- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Holy crap...Dean Mitchell's "It's still a good idea to go!!!" school sinks to #68.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Me tooitachiuchiha wrote:Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the futurealwayssunnyinfl wrote:FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
DROVES of employer will recruit at FSU
But not UF
- TTRansfer

- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Shiiiiiit, I already know that man. This is just for my own curiosity's sake. I'm sure our firedrad lulz wrote:Got you covered broTTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?
- sdmelzer

- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
-
Citizen Genet

- Posts: 521
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:03 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.
Also, UIUC is doing their best Blagojevich.
Also, UIUC is doing their best Blagojevich.
- FeelTheHeat

- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospectssdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
- JayJones78

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
- dproduct

- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Employed at graduation * 43.9%FeelTheHeat wrote:Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospectssdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
JFC
-
Wakelaw15

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
People on here have recently talked about paying sticker @ Fordham. I hope no one is thinking that any more.JayJones78 wrote:sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
-
zman

- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
nope 2015 based on the 2014 class.jay115 wrote:I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?
-
Void

- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:56 am
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
I noticed that Villanova has returned to the T2, after being slapped into the StraTTTosphere following their scandal. Maybe in a few years they'll be back in the 60s.
- jne381

- Posts: 5902
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:38 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)
Is this confirmed that they made no methodology changes with regard to employment, or are you just making this up.Citizen Genet wrote:No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.