2014 Rankings Released Forum

TTRansfer · Post by **TTRansfer** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

What is the raw score for GW?

Wakelaw15 · Post by **Wakelaw15** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.

alwayssunnyinfl · Post by **alwayssunnyinfl** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

pedestrian wrote:
justwalkawayrenee wrote:Chicago ties Columbia, and still most of America probably thinks we're a community college.
Yes, and sadly there is no way to explain that you are "as good as the ivies" without sounding like a Tufts UG.

itachiuchiha · Post by **itachiuchiha** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!

TTRansfer · Post by **TTRansfer** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.

Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!!

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

TTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?

Got you covered bro

alwayssunnyinfl · Post by **alwayssunnyinfl** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!

FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.

hephaestus · Post by **hephaestus** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:26 pm

Wakelaw15 wrote:Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.

Lol

TTRansfer · Post by **TTRansfer** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:26 pm

LOL @ Pitt's epic 22 spot slide. Now tied with WVU. That should help the rivalry there. LULZ.

jay115 · Post by **jay115** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:27 pm

I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?

mb9113 · Post by **mb9113** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

Top two choices tied this year.

Now I can--with absolutely no pretense-- say that rankings play will no role in my decision.

I WON, US NEWS.

itachiuchiha · Post by **itachiuchiha** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.

Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the future

Poo-T · Post by **Poo-T** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

TTRansfer wrote:
Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.
Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!!

yay!!!

JCougar · Post by **JCougar** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:29 pm

Holy crap...Dean Mitchell's "It's still a good idea to go!!!" school sinks to #68.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:29 pm

itachiuchiha wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!
FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.
Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the future

Me too

DROVES of employer will recruit at FSU

But not UF

TTRansfer · Post by **TTRansfer** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

rad lulz wrote:
TTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?
Got you covered bro

Shiiiiiit, I already know that man. This is just for my own curiosity's sake. I'm sure our fired~~old~~ dean won't take credit for our dip to 21.

sdmelzer · Post by **sdmelzer** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

Citizen Genet · Post by **Citizen Genet** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.

Also, UIUC is doing their best Blagojevich.

FeelTheHeat · Post by **FeelTheHeat** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospects

JayJones78 · Post by **JayJones78** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:33 pm

sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

dproduct · Post by **dproduct** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:33 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.
Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospects

Employed at graduation * 43.9%

JFC

Wakelaw15 · Post by **Wakelaw15** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:34 pm

JayJones78 wrote:
sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

People on here have recently talked about paying sticker @ Fordham. I hope no one is thinking that any more.

zman · Post by **zman** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:34 pm

jay115 wrote:I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?

nope 2015 based on the 2014 class.

Void · Post by **Void** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:35 pm

I noticed that Villanova has returned to the T2, after being slapped into the StraTTTosphere following their scandal. Maybe in a few years they'll be back in the 60s.

jne381 · Post by **jne381** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:36 pm

Citizen Genet wrote:No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.

Is this confirmed that they made no methodology changes with regard to employment, or are you just making this up.

2014 Rankings Released Forum

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Register for access!

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Register now!

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?