WL's lsat median went down from 166 to 164 but they went up in rankings somehowYCrevolution wrote:I'd put them as a tie for #2 in Virginia.JamesChapman23 wrote:Guess they couldn't even commit fraud correctly. Reflects poorly on their career services staff. Next year they might want to hire Pless as a consultant.abbottsbar wrote:Sweet baby Jesus, Richmond's employment numbers are abysmal!
Also, can anyone explain to me how Washington and Lee ends up 23? They are about the 4th best law school in a massively over-saturated state....
2013 Rankings Forum
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
- JoeFish
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:43 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Thanks for the sympathy. Yeah... we're all sorry here too. But, eh, things'll work out. I'm lucky enough to be in a position where I'm still going to have pretty good options, as many of us here still are. We'll just have to hustle a bit harder to get those options.Jaeger wrote:JoeFish wrote:Long story, been discussed before, let's not get into it here.Jaeger wrote:With a 177, why the hell did you not apply or ED to T14?
Suffice to say, can't change it now.
k. sorry for your troubles/pless.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:44 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
C/H tied for 3rd next year?t14fanboy wrote:STOP. Does not compute.SpoonForkSpork wrote:Given how closely packed the 2-6 are, I was wondering if there are structural reasons (due to the arbitrary nature of the rankings/criteria) that might prevent Chicago/Columbia from overtaking, say, Harvard/Stanford. Seeing a new top 3 after two decades would be kinda funny.
Also, I can't believe Harvard's median LSAT is higher than Stanford's 75th.
- CwallXC322
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:03 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
2012-13 USNWR Top 100 Law Schools
Rank #. Law School (2012-13 ranking, change in rank, note if applicable)
http://www.lawschoolpredictor.com/?p=775
[Administator Note: Do not copy and paste entire articles from other sources.]
Rank #. Law School (2012-13 ranking, change in rank, note if applicable)
http://www.lawschoolpredictor.com/?p=775
[Administator Note: Do not copy and paste entire articles from other sources.]
- TrojanHopeful
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:37 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
From what I hear, they will be ranked in 2014.horrorbusiness wrote:anyone know why uc irvine remains unranked? i thought their usnwr debut was this year.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
I guess Texas's twelve months of make believe have come to an end
- chup
- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply

-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Yale will still be number 1, dont worry dude just go profitbernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
aschup wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply

-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:51 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Do you really want to add more fuel to this shitfest?bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
It's craziness that 22 schools shifted at least 8 spots (one way or another). It's like they throw the names in a hat and pick at random
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
WL's lsat median went down from 166 to 164 but they went up in rankings somehow
yeah i know what u meant and i actually agree with u, but i simply wanted to point out something thats interesting or just more evidence how retarded USnews rankings are.YCrevolution wrote: True, but I don't really mean tied in a specific metrics sense. I'd put them on par with W&M overall in terms of reputation.
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
lol wuuuuut?bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
herpderp.jpgBronck wrote:lol wuuuuut?bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously though, what do you guys think the rankings will look like for 2014 when I apply
(see above)
I was kidding
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Complete disclosure, I don't know a damn thing about anywhere except for the Richmond market. I'd say in Richmond W&M would have a slight edge over W&L, but ymmv.YCrevolution wrote:True, but I don't really mean tied in a specific metrics sense. I'd put them on par with W&M overall in terms of reputation.splittinghairs wrote:WL's lsat median went down from 166 to 164 but they went up in rankings somehowYCrevolution wrote:I'd put them as a tie for #2 in Virginia.JamesChapman23 wrote:
Guess they couldn't even commit fraud correctly. Reflects poorly on their career services staff. Next year they might want to hire Pless as a consultant.
Also, can anyone explain to me how Washington and Lee ends up 23? They are about the 4th best law school in a massively over-saturated state....
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
f7u12 wrote:Because neither of them have one?YCrevolution wrote:True, but I don't really mean tied in a specific metrics sense. I'd put them on par with W&M overall in terms of reputation.

-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:51 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
abbottsbar wrote:It's craziness that 22 schools shifted at least 8 spots (one way or another).It's likethey throw the names in a hat and pick at random
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
TITCRchimp wrote:gay boobs
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Winner?chimp wrote:gay boobs
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:48 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
What is US News' methodology behind the "Graduates known to be employed at graduation" stat? If grads don't report data, are they assumed unemployed? Or does this stat simply disregard them?
Because many of these schools are probably working with only 50 percent feedback.
Because many of these schools are probably working with only 50 percent feedback.
Last edited by JamesChapman23 on Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- hapas
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:39 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
jealous much?JamesChapman23 wrote:How did a cess pool like Arizona St. end up at 26? Did they buy a bunch of library volumes or something? We know that rankings are disconnected completely from any real employment data or outcomes.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login