CiaoTat wrote:Thanks for those who gave sincere feedback! Based on your supported reasoning, that has been of help and hopefully to other prospective law students.
To clarify:
a) Retake comments --I do appreciate those who explained why you believe that is the best choice! I only found the comments that said RETAKE or KILL YOURSELF to be idiotic and completly immature. If you cannot explain your reasons you are not being helpful to us 0L that care to know.
b) My last remark on LSAT score and slackers was only to reply on a previous post. Basically not only LSAT determines if you will do well in Law School, but so does your undergrad performance. I believe that was already covered by other commenters, but I had to reaffirm why I first brought that up.
c) I did do my research and spoke with recent Touro and Suffolk Law graduates. For those who performed at the top rank, they were in job placements I find myself in--> Which is why my dilemma had come down to my original post.
Thank you for your input to assist in my decision about law school
Your undergrad performance has very little to do with your law school performance. The LSAT has legit predictive validity, though, and I don't know the data, but I would also think that being ESL puts you at a serious disadvantage.
You don't have any legitimate reason to think you will do any better than median -- and I don't mean to be a douche here -- but you can't base your decision on what happens to the best of the best. Especially as someone whose inputs are "average," you have to plan on being average at law school, and the average outcome at any of these schools is unacceptable to a rational person.
If you think you have what it takes to be at the top of your law school class, why don't you think you have what it takes to have a great LSAT score? The latter is much easier than the former, and will make the former exponentially less important. You must retake here.