If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).jenesaislaw wrote:Worth noting that it's very likely that 40% of the public service placement (Gov't or PI) came from school-funded positions.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Class of 2013 Employment Data Forum
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. From what I can tell most of NYU's school-funded positions are decent gigs, and can often be the foot in the door you need to get full-time employment in PI. In some ways the fact that there is a safety net like that exists with a school that has funding for these things could provide some comfort.jenesaislaw wrote:Worth noting that it's very likely that 40% of the public service placement (Gov't or PI) came from school-funded positions.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
I fully agree with you that it is important information to consider when looking at these numbers.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Yeah, this has been common NYU mantra for a while. Since there is no way to quantify it, however, I consider these numbers (biglaw + fed clerkships) a solid guide.lawschool22 wrote:Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
I'm sure its true to some extent. Multiple of the top folks on my journal went into PI. Obviously they could have gotten biglaw if they wanted it (one had a Cravath offer since he was a bit more torn on the biglaw vs. PI route, but ultimately went PI). I'm sure everyone at the school has anecdotes about PI students who could have gotten biglaw, but of course no way to quantify this. But thats certainly not a reason to entirely discount it. But again, you could probably say the same for CLS students who went PI, so its not like its unique to our PI students.lawschool22 wrote:Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jenesaislaw
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.
- cotiger
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
360/537 = 67.0%
You're adding rounded numbers

- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Anecdote: my department recently hired an attorney from CCN who had a school-funded position at a nonprofit for a year. She was doing temp work in the interim. She makes like $50k I think (I almost make that much/please kill me), but the position is LRAP eligible, so she's fine.jenesaislaw wrote:Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.
- jenesaislaw
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Another anecdote: one of LST's founding board members, an NYU grad, was in a school-funded position and transitioned into a paid position. NYU's LRAP is also insanely generous. So although it wasn't bar passage required, she still qualified.francesfarmer wrote:Anecdote: my department recently hired an attorney from CCN who had a school-funded position at a nonprofit for a year. She was doing temp work in the interim. She makes like $50k I think (I almost make that much/please kill me), but the position is LRAP eligible, so she's fine.jenesaislaw wrote:Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
¯\_(ツ)_/¯cotiger wrote:360/537 = 67.0%
You're adding rounded numbers
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.Tiago Splitter wrote:We're only counting federal clerks here.d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%
(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Iowa:
(101+ attorneys=27 students) 14.2% + (Fed clerk=12 students) 6.3%= 20.5%
190 total graduates
http://www.law.uiowa.edu/documents/cso_ ... y_2013.pdf
(101+ attorneys=27 students) 14.2% + (Fed clerk=12 students) 6.3%= 20.5%
190 total graduates
http://www.law.uiowa.edu/documents/cso_ ... y_2013.pdf
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
State clerks are kind of like PI positions. Some are great and very competitive, others are uncompetitive and not all that likely to improve one's job prospects down the line. Generally the higher up you go in the food chain from trial court to state supreme court the more impressive the clerkship becomes. But GAAP requires us to award no points for state clerkships.ManoftheHour wrote:Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.Tiago Splitter wrote:We're only counting federal clerks here.d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%
(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jenesaislaw
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Well, the "Clerkship Rate" is is actually the "Federal Clerkship Rate." Now as for why we don't emphasize the "Clerkship Rate" instead of "Federal Clerkship Rate" is because federal clerkships are far, far, far more competitive and prestigious and that's something people care about.ManoftheHour wrote:Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.Tiago Splitter wrote:We're only counting federal clerks here.d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%
(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
(And what Tiago said, especially the GAAP joke.)
Last edited by jenesaislaw on Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Nice GAAP reference thereTiago Splitter wrote:State clerks are kind of like PI positions. Some are great and very competitive, others are uncompetitive and not all that likely to improve one's job prospects down the line. Generally the higher up you go in the food chain from trial court to state supreme court the more impressive the clerkship becomes. But GAAP requires us to award no points for state clerkships.ManoftheHour wrote:Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.Tiago Splitter wrote:We're only counting federal clerks here.d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%
(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this pointohpobrecito wrote:Yeah, this has been common NYU mantra for a while. Since there is no way to quantify it, however, I consider these numbers (biglaw + fed clerkships) a solid guide.lawschool22 wrote:Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
But but butlawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point
The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.

pretty

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Which one is that?ohpobrecito wrote:But but butlawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point
The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
pretty
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Not a fan of pink wallsohpobrecito wrote:But but butlawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point
The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
pretty

-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Guessing thats Penn? Certainly a nice building right therefrancesfarmer wrote:Which one is that?ohpobrecito wrote:But but butlawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point
The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
pretty
- CoffeeIsLife
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:25 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Yeahhh that makes sense. Full disclosure: I've never been in a law school building.kaiser wrote: Guessing thats Penn? Certainly a nice building right there
- Mauve.Dino
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:55 am
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
Villanova Law:
13% Big Law + 3% Fed. Clerk = 16%
http://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/law ... tdata.html
13% Big Law + 3% Fed. Clerk = 16%
http://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/law ... tdata.html
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data
See NYU c/o 2017 thread for pretty pictures of NYU, ohpo



Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login