Class of 2013 Employment Data Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
kaiser

Gold
Posts: 3019
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by kaiser » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:49 am

jenesaislaw wrote:
kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Worth noting that it's very likely that 40% of the public service placement (Gov't or PI) came from school-funded positions.
If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:54 am

jenesaislaw wrote:
kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Worth noting that it's very likely that 40% of the public service placement (Gov't or PI) came from school-funded positions.
Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. From what I can tell most of NYU's school-funded positions are decent gigs, and can often be the foot in the door you need to get full-time employment in PI. In some ways the fact that there is a safety net like that exists with a school that has funding for these things could provide some comfort.

I fully agree with you that it is important information to consider when looking at these numbers.

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:55 am

kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.

04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by 04102014 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:59 am

lawschool22 wrote:
kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.
Yeah, this has been common NYU mantra for a while. Since there is no way to quantify it, however, I consider these numbers (biglaw + fed clerkships) a solid guide.

kaiser

Gold
Posts: 3019
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by kaiser » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:01 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.
I'm sure its true to some extent. Multiple of the top folks on my journal went into PI. Obviously they could have gotten biglaw if they wanted it (one had a Cravath offer since he was a bit more torn on the biglaw vs. PI route, but ultimately went PI). I'm sure everyone at the school has anecdotes about PI students who could have gotten biglaw, but of course no way to quantify this. But thats certainly not a reason to entirely discount it. But again, you could probably say the same for CLS students who went PI, so its not like its unique to our PI students.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by jenesaislaw » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:21 pm

kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.

As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.

User avatar
cotiger

Gold
Posts: 1648
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by cotiger » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:23 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
360/537 = 67.0%

You're adding rounded numbers :wink:

User avatar
francesfarmer

Silver
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by francesfarmer » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:24 pm

jenesaislaw wrote:
kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.

As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.
Anecdote: my department recently hired an attorney from CCN who had a school-funded position at a nonprofit for a year. She was doing temp work in the interim. She makes like $50k I think (I almost make that much/please kill me), but the position is LRAP eligible, so she's fine.

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by jenesaislaw » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:37 pm

francesfarmer wrote:
jenesaislaw wrote:
kaiser wrote:If thats where school-funded positions are grouped, I would guess you could say the same for every school then (i.e. that some portion of their Gov/PI placement is really just school-funded positions).
Yes, but not all schools have the ability to afford (m/any) long-term, full-time school-funded jobs.

As lawschool22 points out, this is not necessarily a bad thing. These graduates are better off than they would have been had they not had school-funded jobs. It's probably not what they would have wanted when starting law school, and it's unclear how well they're doing after the job. To me that's the difference between the graduate perspective and the applicant's perspective.
Anecdote: my department recently hired an attorney from CCN who had a school-funded position at a nonprofit for a year. She was doing temp work in the interim. She makes like $50k I think (I almost make that much/please kill me), but the position is LRAP eligible, so she's fine.
Another anecdote: one of LST's founding board members, an NYU grad, was in a school-funded position and transitioned into a paid position. NYU's LRAP is also insanely generous. So although it wasn't bar passage required, she still qualified.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by 04102014 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:42 pm

cotiger wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
360/537 = 67.0%

You're adding rounded numbers :wink:
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by ManoftheHour » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:52 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%

(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
We're only counting federal clerks here.
Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.

DportIA

Bronze
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by DportIA » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:55 pm

Iowa:

(101+ attorneys=27 students) 14.2% + (Fed clerk=12 students) 6.3%= 20.5%

190 total graduates
http://www.law.uiowa.edu/documents/cso_ ... y_2013.pdf

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:57 pm

ManoftheHour wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%

(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
We're only counting federal clerks here.
Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.
State clerks are kind of like PI positions. Some are great and very competitive, others are uncompetitive and not all that likely to improve one's job prospects down the line. Generally the higher up you go in the food chain from trial court to state supreme court the more impressive the clerkship becomes. But GAAP requires us to award no points for state clerkships.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by jenesaislaw » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:58 pm

ManoftheHour wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%

(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
We're only counting federal clerks here.
Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.
Well, the "Clerkship Rate" is is actually the "Federal Clerkship Rate." Now as for why we don't emphasize the "Clerkship Rate" instead of "Federal Clerkship Rate" is because federal clerkships are far, far, far more competitive and prestigious and that's something people care about.

(And what Tiago said, especially the GAAP joke.)
Last edited by jenesaislaw on Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:59 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
d cooper wrote:Florida Coastal: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9%

(I think I did that right, but someone double check.)
We're only counting federal clerks here.
Probably a stupid question, but does that mean state clerks are TTT? Just wondering why they don't count towards the clerkship rate on LST.
State clerks are kind of like PI positions. Some are great and very competitive, others are uncompetitive and not all that likely to improve one's job prospects down the line. Generally the higher up you go in the food chain from trial court to state supreme court the more impressive the clerkship becomes. But GAAP requires us to award no points for state clerkships.
Nice GAAP reference there :lol:

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:00 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
kaiser wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/fi ... duates.pdf

NYU

58.3% + 8.8% = 67.1%
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Also explains NYU's slightly lower combined rate. I would imagine a certain portion (I have no idea how much) of NYU's PI people could have also landed a biglaw gig or federal clerkship, and that this percentage may be slightly higher than other peer schools due to self-selection. I don't know how to quantify this though, just a hunch.
Yeah, this has been common NYU mantra for a while. Since there is no way to quantify it, however, I consider these numbers (biglaw + fed clerkships) a solid guide.
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point :lol:

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.

04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by 04102014 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:09 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point :lol:

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
But but but

Image



pretty :o

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
francesfarmer

Silver
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by francesfarmer » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:10 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point :lol:

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
But but but

Image



pretty :o
Which one is that?

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:11 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point :lol:

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
But but but

Image



pretty :o
Not a fan of pink walls :lol:

kaiser

Gold
Posts: 3019
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by kaiser » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:12 pm

francesfarmer wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
Oh ohpo, you and I both know we are just batting for our respective schools at this point :lol:

The way I look at it is I would find it hard to believe that the Columbia vs. NYU biglaw % are that far apart w/o some level of increased self-selection into PI going on at NYU as compared to the rest of CCN and Penn, which lately has garnered a great biglaw reputation.
But but but

Image



pretty :o
Which one is that?
Guessing thats Penn? Certainly a nice building right there

User avatar
CoffeeIsLife

Bronze
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:25 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by CoffeeIsLife » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:14 pm

LSU is up http://www1.law.lsu.edu/careerservices/ ... tatistics/

7.8% + 3.2% = 11%

218 Graduates

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
d cooper

Bronze
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:21 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by d cooper » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:14 pm

Image

User avatar
francesfarmer

Silver
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by francesfarmer » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:14 pm

kaiser wrote: Guessing thats Penn? Certainly a nice building right there
Yeahhh that makes sense. Full disclosure: I've never been in a law school building.

User avatar
Mauve.Dino

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:55 am

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by Mauve.Dino » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:16 pm

Villanova Law:

13% Big Law + 3% Fed. Clerk = 16%

http://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/law ... tdata.html

User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Class of 2013 Employment Data

Post by lawschool22 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:20 pm

See NYU c/o 2017 thread for pretty pictures of NYU, ohpo :D :lol:

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”