T6 or GTFO Forum

[Mal Reynolds]

Aspies abound.

[manu6926]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

AGREED

you wouldn't join any law school that would have you as a member amirite

what?

[bonerland]

.

[johnnyquest]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

AGREED

you wouldn't join any law school that would have you as a member amirite

what?

Marxism
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Groucho_Marx

[SLS_AMG]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

Uh, no. Hypothetically speaking, who cares if Cornell's entry standards are lower than Michigan's if it does a better job placing its graduates into jobs? Who cares if NYU has higher entry standards than Northwestern if it does a worse job in placement? To the degree that entry standards matter at all to firms, they've already taken them into account by selecting how many students to hire/interviewers to send to campus OCIs. The fact that you went to a school that a 172 LSAT median in and of itself is not going to get you jobs down the road.

No point of seeing your post, since you evidently didn't see my post about employment at graduation rates.
I seriously wouldn't wanna go to a school full of kids in the 160s and below 3.8 range.
I mean it's, for most people, their last chance to study with the brightest students.

Northwestern has better job placement than NYU? That just made me chuckle. I didn't even apply to that school. Bring up some hard data. Not the "biglaw" rates, since as I've said, based solely on that, YLS would be worse than Penn, which is clearly nonsense.

Are you trolling or are you seriously this dumb?

[manu6926]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

Uh, no. Hypothetically speaking, who cares if Cornell's entry standards are lower than Michigan's if it does a better job placing its graduates into jobs? Who cares if NYU has higher entry standards than Northwestern if it does a worse job in placement? To the degree that entry standards matter at all to firms, they've already taken them into account by selecting how many students to hire/interviewers to send to campus OCIs. The fact that you went to a school that a 172 LSAT median in and of itself is not going to get you jobs down the road.

No point of seeing your post, since you evidently didn't see my post about employment at graduation rates.
I seriously wouldn't wanna go to a school full of kids in the 160s and below 3.8 range.
I mean it's, for most people, their last chance to study with the brightest students.

Northwestern has better job placement than NYU? That just made me chuckle. I didn't even apply to that school. Bring up some hard data. Not the "biglaw" rates, since as I've said, based solely on that, YLS would be worse than Penn, which is clearly nonsense.

Are you trolling or are you seriously this dumb?

[chneyo]

...

[monsterman]

RIP HIS HEAD OFF!!

If I knew how to do gifs it would be will Ferrell screaming that from old school

[rickgrimes69]

mrw reading this thread

[TheSpanishMain]

If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

Shit just got real.

[yomisterd]

*when I created this thread*

[Law Sauce]

If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct?

Quoted

Seriously though, why would anyone say this? Maybe should take a break from the tls mindset for a while.

[Carter1901]

If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

I feel bad for the rest of the student body at the school you ultimately end up attending.

[whereskyle]

$$$$ or GTFO

[jbagelboy]

ad hominem attacks employing LSAT scores in the on-topics are a ban-worthy offense, are they not? Either way, hard core faux pas.

Also aspiebro, you do realize if your school has a 3.8 "median," a few 3.79's may have slipped in right? God forbid, Yale admits a 169! Except they do every year. That TTT admitted a 152 last year. Student quality has extraordinarily limited relation to incoming medians at the top schools. Those that argue otherwise evidently have nothing else to live for and should seek counseling.

[copingtrope]

If you are going to be this offensive, I shall not back down.
If anyone is trolling, it must be you. You are the one that's going against the data I've posted and persistently claiming "Penn rocks! NYU sucks!".
If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

And so your 174 automatically makes you correct? It's amazing how some people who score so well on a test based on logic and reasoning can demonstrate such terrible...well...logic and reasoning.

[manu6926]

If you are going to be this offensive, I shall not back down.
If anyone is trolling, it must be you. You are the one that's going against the data I've posted and persistently claiming "Penn rocks! NYU sucks!".
If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

And so your 174 automatically makes you correct? It's amazing how some people who score so well on a test based on logic and reasoning can demonstrate such terrible...well...logic and reasoning.

I never said what he said or what I said is correct based on our LSAT scores.
I reacted to his statement about me being dumb.

[manu6926]

ad hominem attacks employing LSAT scores in the on-topics are a ban-worthy offense, are they not? Either way, hard core faux pas.

Also aspiebro, you do realize if your school has a 3.8 "median," a few 3.79's may have slipped in right? God forbid, Yale admits a 169! Except they do every year. That TTT admitted a 152 last year. Student quality has extraordinarily limited relation to incoming medians at the top schools. Those that argue otherwise evidently have nothing else to live for and should seek counseling.

Look at the conversation carefully. I didn't initiate the ad hominem attacks. I tried to avoid saying such stupid things as bringing up his LSAT score, but he called me "dumb" all of a sudden.

Besides, my sentence about "schools full of" of those kids doesn't mean that those kids should not be included in the student body.

[manu6926]

If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

I feel bad for the rest of the student body at the school you ultimately end up attending.

[rpupkin]

If anyone is dumb, that must be you too. Your highest LSAT score is 168, am I correct? I really didn't want to say that, but since you crossed the line, I found no reason to avoid saying this.

I feel bad for the rest of the student body at the school you ultimately end up attending.

Feel bad about HYS then.

I like you.

[copingtrope]

but he called me "dumb" all of a sudden.

Okay, so then maybe you're both pretty childish. Is that better?

[lawschool22]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

Uh, no. Hypothetically speaking, who cares if Cornell's entry standards are lower than Michigan's if it does a better job placing its graduates into jobs? Who cares if NYU has higher entry standards than Northwestern if it does a worse job in placement? To the degree that entry standards matter at all to firms, they've already taken them into account by selecting how many students to hire/interviewers to send to campus OCIs. The fact that you went to a school that a 172 LSAT median in and of itself is not going to get you jobs down the road.

No point of seeing your post, since you evidently didn't see my post about employment at graduation rates.
I seriously wouldn't wanna go to a school full of kids in the 160s and below 3.8 range.
I mean it's, for most people, their last chance to study with the brightest students.

Northwestern has better job placement than NYU? That just made me chuckle. I didn't even apply to that school. Bring up some hard data. Not the "biglaw" rates, since as I've said, based solely on that, YLS would be worse than Penn, which is clearly nonsense.

LOL at <3.8 equaling objective idiots. Wait, I shouldn't even be responding to you. I doubt you can even understand someone who is at my non-existent level of intelligence.

[manu6926]

But we should factor in entry standards too.

Uh, no. Hypothetically speaking, who cares if Cornell's entry standards are lower than Michigan's if it does a better job placing its graduates into jobs? Who cares if NYU has higher entry standards than Northwestern if it does a worse job in placement? To the degree that entry standards matter at all to firms, they've already taken them into account by selecting how many students to hire/interviewers to send to campus OCIs. The fact that you went to a school that a 172 LSAT median in and of itself is not going to get you jobs down the road.

No point of seeing your post, since you evidently didn't see my post about employment at graduation rates.
I seriously wouldn't wanna go to a school full of kids in the 160s and below 3.8 range.
I mean it's, for most people, their last chance to study with the brightest students.

Northwestern has better job placement than NYU? That just made me chuckle. I didn't even apply to that school. Bring up some hard data. Not the "biglaw" rates, since as I've said, based solely on that, YLS would be worse than Penn, which is clearly nonsense.

LOL at <3.8 equaling objective idiots. Wait, I shouldn't even be responding to you. I doubt you can even understand someone who is at my non-existent level of intelligence.

[lawschool22]

I didn't equate them to idiots. It's just my personal preference.
Plus, of course, any school will have their share of such kids. But I'd imagine that in some schools, they would dominate the student body.

Oh the horror! You totally missed the point of what I was saying.

[manu6926]

but he called me "dumb" all of a sudden.

Okay, so then maybe you're both pretty childish. Is that better?