You are what is wrong with this country. Your level of entitlement surpasses the shittiest of all the shitboomers.tarp wrote:You do realize that for some people, it's either go to law school now, or never go? People get older, less inclined to go to school, get settled in employment, start families, etc. There's also plenty of people out there who can pay 16k a year for three years plus living expenses, out of pocket, and will graduate without any debt. Even if they don't find a legal job for a few years, that person now has a law degree that will be an asset once the economy improves.
NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace Forum
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
You're an idiot. HTH.tarp wrote:That's cool, if you have some stupid undergrad degree like English.
If you're a biochemist, there will be opportunities out there.
Not everyone is a whiny little 21 year old kid fresh out of undergrad who majored in General Studies and sees law school as a shortcut to a shiny new biglaw gig since they're not smart enough for med school.
Personally, I am hanging my own shingle and doing contract work for other established lawyers and quickly building myself a very strong reputation in my area. Law is a profession and should be treated as such. Employment is never the goal... practicing law is the goal. A lawyer should aspire to self-employment, or partnership, not merely being an associate in a firm.
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:22 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
are you sure you aren't writing this from the public computer at the local mental hospital?tarp wrote:LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
- cinephile
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
But you still have to work for your clients. You're not really working for yourself. You're never going to be free so long as you have to work for a living.tarp wrote:LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
At top law schools, most people are not terrified of not being able to find a job. They are motivated and understand that if they fall in the bottom of the class, they are in trouble, but they are generally not terrified as it sounds like people at Drexel are (and they should be! 40% post-grad employment is pretty terrible....you have better odds putting 200K on red at a casino).tarp wrote:Newsflash: EVERYONE in the COUNTRY is terrified about being unable to find a job. The job market and the economy stinks in general.
You are thinking short-term if you think a law degree from anything but a top 14 school is worthless in the long run. Once the economy improves, the job market will improve as well.
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:22 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Absolutely - I agree. If someone has the option of attending a top law school, then that would be the best insurance against joblessness. The only situation where I would advocate passing up on UPENN for something like Rutgers-Camden or Drexel would be if you have a very specific goal in mind that does not require an elite degree (like opening your own law office, or you already have a job lined up), and UPENN would cost way more.somewhatwayward wrote:At top law schools, most people are not terrified of not being able to find a job. They are motivated and understand that if they fall in the bottom of the class, they are in trouble, but they are generally not terrified as it sounds like people at Drexel are (and they should be! 40% post-grad employment is pretty terrible....you have better odds putting 200K on red at a casino).tarp wrote:Newsflash: EVERYONE in the COUNTRY is terrified about being unable to find a job. The job market and the economy stinks in general.
You are thinking short-term if you think a law degree from anything but a top 14 school is worthless in the long run. Once the economy improves, the job market will improve as well.
That's absolutely correct too. I'd rather work for clients, whom I can pick and choose and whom I can individually "fire" if they become untenable, than for a boss who can control the minutia of my daily life. But you are correct that, in the end, everyone answers to others unless they are independently wealthy.cinephile wrote:But you still have to work for your clients. You're not really working for yourself. You're never going to be free so long as you have to work for a living.tarp wrote:LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
That is good because Harvard or Yale wouldn't have admitted you. Good thing to have realistic expectations. Most people need a job so they can live and pay bills. It is great you have plenty of money so you don't have to worry about that.tarp wrote:LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
But as you raised the question: how much did you make last year after expenses? How much did it cost to set up your office? What are your monthly expenses for your office? What about living expenses?
Where are you getting referrals from for work ( I know nothing about contract work for other lawyers.). Are you in IP or something else? What hours are you working? Any other information about what you are doing would be helpful.
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:22 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
I'm still waiting to get admitted, and working doing what I did before law school right now, which pays the bills. Also doing legal research and writing on a contract basis. I set up my office for under $1000 in furniture and equipment, and I pay $300 a month for rent (single office). Will be practicing immigration law which is in high demand in this area. I am sure the first 6 months to a year will be tough getting established but I am spending all my time networking right now, and will be doing advertising and community outreach. Hanging a shingle is not for everyone but if you have some business sense and are good at selling yourself, you can make it work. There's a lot of solo and small firm guys out there and they aren't starving. There's definitely room for a few more good lawyers out there. The key is you have to love this line of work and you have to put your heart and soul into it. You can't just be in it for the money, or you'll probably crash and burn.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
So you have you gone to law school yet?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Well given that people still go to NYLS and Pace, I imagine a lot of people aren't doing it for the money. More like just making their boomer mothers proud.
- cinephile
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Independent wealth is the only road to true happiness.
Or maybe marrying for money.
Satisfaction cannot be found through work.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
this thread is a joke
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:44 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Independent wealth is the only road to true happiness.cinephile wrote:[quote="tarp"]But you are correct that, in the end, everyone answers to others unless they are independently wealthy.
Or maybe marrying for money.
Satisfaction cannot be found through work.[/quote]
Are you on meds? If not, can you be? You're like a manic depressive, and change subjects randomly. Who asked about true happiness?
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:22 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Isn't that the overarching goal? People don't go to law school because it sounds like fun. They go because they think it's part of a path that will lead them to increased happiness in life. Most people's actions are taken in furtherance of the goal of achieving happiness.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:44 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
i guess that makes sense. it just seemed odd to bring it out of no where.tarp wrote:Isn't that the overarching goal? People don't go to law school because it sounds like fun. They go because they think it's part of a path that will lead them to increased happiness in life. Most people's actions are taken in furtherance of the goal of achieving happiness.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
Somehow this was overlooked in the chaos.
How did no one call troll when a supposed scientist said this?pianoguy7 wrote: numbers are just numbers
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
He doesn't have clients. He does contract research and writing. I did the same thing during and after law school while waiting for my real job to start, the only difference is I didn't waste money on an office.cinephile wrote:But you still have to work for your clients. You're not really working for yourself. You're never going to be free so long as you have to work for a living.tarp wrote:LOL, I have to laugh at these posts. I have zero debt, a J.D. cum laude from Drexel and have the financial freedom to hang up my own shingle and be my own boss. I can spend time with my family when I so desire, and I don't answer to anybody. It's great having no loans to pay back!
I wouldn't have taken Harvard or Yale at sticker, since I have no desire to work for the man.
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
On the last page, you said you are "quickly building myself a very strong reputation in my area"....you mean you are quickly building a strong reputation in legal research/writing contract work?tarp wrote:I'm still waiting to get admitted, and working doing what I did before law school right now, which pays the bills. Also doing legal research and writing on a contract basis. I set up my office for under $1000 in furniture and equipment, and I pay $300 a month for rent (single office). Will be practicing immigration law which is in high demand in this area. I am sure the first 6 months to a year will be tough getting established but I am spending all my time networking right now, and will be doing advertising and community outreach. Hanging a shingle is not for everyone but if you have some business sense and are good at selling yourself, you can make it work. There's a lot of solo and small firm guys out there and they aren't starving. There's definitely room for a few more good lawyers out there. The key is you have to love this line of work and you have to put your heart and soul into it. You can't just be in it for the money, or you'll probably crash and burn.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
shitlaw LOOMS
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rickgrimes69
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:56 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
tarp wrote:I'm still waiting to get admitted, and working doing what I did before law school right now, which pays the bills. Also doing legal research and writing on a contract basis. I set up my office for under $1000 in furniture and equipment, and I pay $300 a month for rent (single office). Will be practicing immigration law which is in high demand in this area. I am sure the first 6 months to a year will be tough getting established but I am spending all my time networking right now, and will be doing advertising and community outreach. Hanging a shingle is not for everyone but if you have some business sense and are good at selling yourself, you can make it work.
Law school teaches you nothing about being a practicing lawyer. Hanging a shingle with no experience, connections, or start up capital is a recipe for disaster for nearly everyone. Come back in a year when you're still in business and maybe you can talk.
The fact that you believe this in the face of such overwhelming evidence to the contrary just demonstrates how woefully uninformed you are. I'm not trying to be mean, but it's very obvious you have no idea what you're talking about.There's a lot of solo and small firm guys out there and they aren't starving. There's definitely room for a few more good lawyers out there.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
At first when you said this, I thought you were actually practicing and having success, and you were entitled to at least some respect despite your atrociously awful advice. But you're not even in law school yet? Holy LOLballstarp wrote:Personally, I am hanging my own shingle and doing contract work for other established lawyers and quickly building myself a very strong reputation in my area. Law is a profession and should be treated as such. Employment is never the goal... practicing law is the goal. A lawyer should aspire to self-employment, or partnership, not merely being an associate in a firm.
- Icculus
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
I think he graduated and is waiting for admission to the bar.romothesavior wrote:At first when you said this, I thought you were actually practicing and having success, and you were entitled to at least some respect despite your atrociously awful advice. But you're not even in law school yet? Holy LOLballstarp wrote:Personally, I am hanging my own shingle and doing contract work for other established lawyers and quickly building myself a very strong reputation in my area. Law is a profession and should be treated as such. Employment is never the goal... practicing law is the goal. A lawyer should aspire to self-employment, or partnership, not merely being an associate in a firm.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: NYLS v. St. John's v. Seton Hall v. Drexel v. Pace
I remember an areyouinsane story where he described how it was a cliche for people on the contract doc review circuit to have their own solo practices. They all used the same Staples self-print business cards.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login