I mean... I guess, but I don't think there's a Shangri-La of legal recruiting anywhere right now. I f I had to guess, I would say it probably has more to do with how accustomed they were to taking non-locals in boom times. Seattle was always pretty insular.JPrezy87 wrote:IAFG wrote:Some markets care more than others. IME, Seattle was brutal, other markets were more open-minded.Gail wrote:I'm getting the picture that law school is not at all a way to relocate across the country. Firms like kids who grew up near their city.
so what you're saying is...the less competition there is in a local market, the less likely firm recruiters are to give out of staters the evil eye?
Regional v. Top Schools Forum
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Regional v. Top Schools
- Veyron

- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Regional v. Top Schools
Oh yes there is ... Texas.I don't think there's a Shangri-La of legal recruiting anywhere right now.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login