funny how every other school can get bashed to pieces but as soon as UM is mentioned the white knights come alivepaulinaporizkova wrote:debtsucks wrote:you dont agree? what about its 30% nlj250 placement? that doesnt count?moneybagsphd wrote:debtsucks wrote:so we all agree mich is in decline? this is a good start for the undeserved loved it gets herepaulinaporizkova wrote:moneybagsphd wrote:debtsucks wrote:so we all agree mich is in decline? this is a good start for the undeserved loved it gets here
oh god i miss all this dumbass shit so much sometimes
2013 Rankings Forum
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
ScrabbleChamp wrote:I gotta give you props... You created an account and waited 2 months before trolling... Impressive, but you obviously have some weird problem with Michigan when your first 4 posts serve no purpose other than to attempt to disparage Michigan. Bravo, sir. Incredible patience.debtsucks wrote:so we all agree mich is in decline? this is a good start for the undeserved loved it gets here
so nlj250 doesnt count then. I just want to make sure
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
brah, i hate michigandebtsucks wrote:
funny how every other school can get bashed to pieces but as soon as UM is mentioned the white knights come alive
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:22 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
we are few brehpaulinaporizkova wrote:brah, i hate michigandebtsucks wrote:
funny how every other school can get bashed to pieces but as soon as UM is mentioned the white knights come alive
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cicero, Fin. III 16
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:30 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
If someone with access to the numbers could PM me, I have a small request.
Thanks
Thanks
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I'd believe that except Vanderbilt, WUSTL and a few others have better NLJ250 placement and they are not in biglaw markets either.minnbills wrote:MN just doesn't have much of a biglaw market, and not being a t-14 it doesn't have reach into chicago and ny to make up for it.Jaeger wrote:How can Minnesota get a 4 out of 5 assessment score by lawyers/judges and still have the piss poor big law numbers it has? Are all the lawyers assessing public defenders?
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
JDizzle2015 wrote:Quoted for future reference.Excellent117 wrote:#1 Yale: 170-177 LSAT, 3.83-3.96 GPA -- 173 and 3.9 medians -- 91.8% employed after 9 monthsRonnyDworkin wrote:Anyone have more detailed data? The raw score data is definitely useful. Any data on medians and the assessment scores?
#2 Stanford: 167-172 LSAT, 3.72-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.85 medians -- 97.1% employed after 9 months
#3 Harvard: 171-176 LSAT, 3.78-3.97 GPA -- 173 and 3.89 medians -- 94.6% employed after 9 months
#4 Columbia: 170-175 LSAT, 3.6-3.82 GPA -- 172 and 3.72 medians -- 96.5% employed after 9 months
#5 Chicago: 167-173 LSAT, 3.71-3.94 GPA -- 171 and 3.87 medians -- 97.9% employed after 9 months
#6 NYU: 170-174 LSAT, 3.57-3.85 GPA -- 172 and 3.71 medians -- 96.6% employed after 9 months
#7 Berkeley: 164-169 LSAT, 3.62-3.88 GPA -- 167 and 3.79 medians -- 93.6% employed after 9 months
#7 Penn: 166-171 LSAT, 3.58-3.93 GPA -- 170 and 3.86 medians -- 96% employed after 9 months
#7 Virginia: 165-171 LSAT, 3.49-3.94 GPA -- 170 and 3.86 medians -- 98.1% employed after 9 months
#10 Michigan: 167-170 LSAT, 3.59-3.87 GPA -- 169 and 3.76 medians -- 92.2% employed after 9 months
#11 Duke: 167-171 LSAT, 3.62-3.84 GPA -- 170 and 3.75 medians -- 94.8% employed after 9 months
#12 Northwestern: 165-171 LSAT, 3.35-3.85 GPA -- 170 and 3.8 medians -- 94% employed after 9 months
#13 Georgetown: 167-171 LSAT, 3.44-3.8 GPA -- 170 and 3.71 medians -- 96% employed after 9 months
#14 Cornell: 166-169 LSAT, 3.5-3.77 GPA -- 168 and 3.63 medians -- 96.9% employed after 9 months
Hope this helps
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Vanderbilt feeds into multiple markets- I never understood how WUSTL's placement panned out though. Chicago I guess?Jaeger wrote: I'd believe that except Vanderbilt, WUSTL and a few others have better NLJ250 placement and they are not in biglaw markets either.
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I understand not liking Michigan, i guess. But you're taking this to an all new level.debtsucks wrote:ScrabbleChamp wrote:I gotta give you props... You created an account and waited 2 months before trolling... Impressive, but you obviously have some weird problem with Michigan when your first 4 posts serve no purpose other than to attempt to disparage Michigan. Bravo, sir. Incredible patience.debtsucks wrote:so we all agree mich is in decline? this is a good start for the undeserved loved it gets here
so nlj250 doesnt count then. I just want to make sure
Did you not get in or something? Why the constant hating?
....U mad bro?
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:56 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
acirilli1722 wrote:Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
Nova 101
Drexel 119
Sorry to break it to ya
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
bro honestly im kinda man at their shit placement because I did want to go there and still might but nlj250 was a stick in the spokesTMC116 wrote:I understand not liking Michigan, i guess. But you're taking this to an all new level.debtsucks wrote:ScrabbleChamp wrote:I gotta give you props... You created an account and waited 2 months before trolling... Impressive, but you obviously have some weird problem with Michigan when your first 4 posts serve no purpose other than to attempt to disparage Michigan. Bravo, sir. Incredible patience.debtsucks wrote:so we all agree mich is in decline? this is a good start for the undeserved loved it gets here
so nlj250 doesnt count then. I just want to make sure
Did you not get in or something? Why the constant hating?
....U mad bro?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:22 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
yea I saw that wasn't sure if anybody had the quality rankings or employment at 9 monthsPinkRevolver wrote:acirilli1722 wrote:Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
Nova 101
Drexel 119
Sorry to break it to ya
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Does any of it really matter? Numbers are numbers. The location of the school is no excuse because in the end, if a student wants a biglaw job they shouldn't go to a school that has craptastic numbers --be it in NYC or in north dakota.minnbills wrote:Vanderbilt feeds into multiple markets- I never understood how WUSTL's placement panned out though. Chicago I guess?Jaeger wrote: I'd believe that except Vanderbilt, WUSTL and a few others have better NLJ250 placement and they are not in biglaw markets either.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Last years data for T15 to compare: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=150329
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
minnbills wrote:Vanderbilt feeds into multiple markets- I never understood how WUSTL's placement panned out though. Chicago I guess?Jaeger wrote: I'd believe that except Vanderbilt, WUSTL and a few others have better NLJ250 placement and they are not in biglaw markets either.
MN is probably just as far from Chicago as WUSTL.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TTRansfer
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
I assume Nova's scandal hurts them worse than "honest placement stats."acirilli1722 wrote:Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
- emptyflare
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:36 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
!@!@!@!@
Last edited by emptyflare on Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
TLS_noobie wrote:Does any of it really matter? Numbers are numbers. The location of the school is no excuse because in the end, if a student wants a biglaw job they shouldn't go to a school that has craptastic numbers --be it in NYC or in north dakota.minnbills wrote:Vanderbilt feeds into multiple markets- I never understood how WUSTL's placement panned out though. Chicago I guess?Jaeger wrote: I'd believe that except Vanderbilt, WUSTL and a few others have better NLJ250 placement and they are not in biglaw markets either.
I don't think that's the argument. It's more an explanation of why the numbers are the way they are.
- swtlilsoni
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:00 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
isn't it a REALLY big deal that GULC placed 13? Isn't this the FIRST time they have EVER been anything other than 14?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:17 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
can someone post or pm me utah stats? thanks!!
- BK201
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:16 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Didn't their scandal start because they decided to be honest though?TTRansfer wrote:I assume Nova's scandal hurts them worse than "honest placement stats."acirilli1722 wrote:Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:22 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
I think it has forced them to be more honestBK201 wrote:Didn't their scandal start because they decided to be honest though?TTRansfer wrote:I assume Nova's scandal hurts them worse than "honest placement stats."acirilli1722 wrote:Anybody have the stats for Nova and Drexel. I think the honest placement stats hurt both of them
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I mean, they still graduate a ridiculously huge class into a saturated market. So not really.swtlilsoni wrote:isn't it a REALLY big deal that GULC placed 13? Isn't this the FIRST time they have EVER been anything other than 14?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login