Thanks.Bronck wrote:GWU: 94.3%Jaeger wrote:Can anyone post or PM GWU and/or UMN's 9 month rates? Thanks.
UMN: 91.9%
2013 Rankings Forum
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
-
- Posts: 7445
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
splittinghairs wrote:Again, how did WUSTL report, what were the new standards. Right now you've basically offered some conclusion, but im curious as to what exactly your dean meant by the new standards.romothesavior wrote:This is the thing. The ABA created new rules and no one followed them. Our school did because our dean is like ABA chair elect of the law school division or something, so we're at 80%. Our peers conveniently missed the memo about the new standards and continue to report 95%+. All of our data is the same or better than 2011, but we dropped 5 spots because we followed new protocol.Big Shrimpin wrote:I love how like almos all schools report 90+% employing at 9 months. Lol, just lol.
USNWR and the ABA suck. Thankfully this rankings shit is meaningless.
quit splitting hairs bro
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Anyone know the "Law Firms Ranking Law Schools" rankings? just for kicks and giggles...
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:51 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
WTF is this shit.JLin179 wrote:I'm a student at the Yale Law School in Connecticut...things are absolutely out of control here. Students dancing on tables, throwing hornbooks at each other, stripping their tees off and running up and down Wall Street in a maddened frenzy. Dean Post kicked in the door to the dining hall (where the most raucous of the gadabouts were cavorting) and demanded silence, only to slam a boombox on the ground and triumphantly proclaim "You mad, Minow?" The music poured forth from the speakers like elixir from the Fountain of Youth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9mFZq-JMfs
The party rages on..as I write prestigious legal minds continue to hoot and holler into the night into the New Haven night
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Can someone please post the info for Syracuse?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
t14fanboy wrote:WTF is this shit.JLin179 wrote:I'm a student at the Yale Law School in Connecticut...things are absolutely out of control here. Students dancing on tables, throwing hornbooks at each other, stripping their tees off and running up and down Wall Street in a maddened frenzy. Dean Post kicked in the door to the dining hall (where the most raucous of the gadabouts were cavorting) and demanded silence, only to slam a boombox on the ground and triumphantly proclaim "You mad, Minow?" The music poured forth from the speakers like elixir from the Fountain of Youth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9mFZq-JMfs
The party rages on..as I write prestigious legal minds continue to hoot and holler into the night into the New Haven night
ya wut
- TTRansfer
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
I am applying for transfer to GW and there is no way that GW's number is accurate. I would be shocked if 94% of the graduates are employed at nine months.Bronck wrote:GWU: 94.3%Jaeger wrote:Can anyone post or PM GWU and/or UMN's 9 month rates? Thanks.
UMN: 91.9%
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
LOL@ a midnight stakeout for this and the guy at Stanford who says that they're pumped. Oh, TLS.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
A thousand times thisf7u12 wrote:Can you guys unban general tso for the day?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:07 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
mich is falling to their correct ranking; 11-14 would be better, but this is a startGail wrote:idk. probably not. probs just for shits and giggles, honestly.debtsucks wrote:lol is that the reason? or maybe is it bc they all were told to bid on chicago? which one for the moment?Gail wrote:Michigan punished for being so holistic.
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Syracuse:ShowJumper560 wrote:Can someone please post the info for Syracuse?
Score 43
Peer assessment score (out of 5) 2.4
Assessment score by lawyers/judges (out of 5) 3.0
GPA (25th-75th percentile) 3.1-3.56
Median undergraduate GPA for all program entrants 3.36
LSAT scores (25th-75th percentile) 153-157
Median LSAT score for all program entrants 155
Graduates known to be employed nine months after graduation 81.5%
- NZA
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
180f7u12 wrote:Can you guys unban general tso for the day?
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
It's pretty easy to get a job at Starbucks.TTRansfer wrote:I am applying for transfer to GW and there is no way that GW's number is accurate. I would be shocked if 94% of the graduates are employed at nine months.Bronck wrote:GWU: 94.3%Jaeger wrote:Can anyone post or PM GWU and/or UMN's 9 month rates? Thanks.
UMN: 91.9%
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Detailed stats for WI and Fordham? Many thanks.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:56 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Can someone plz post about Fordham's stats? At least their 9 month plz?
And American.....if its not too much trouble
And American.....if its not too much trouble

-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:43 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
hahahahaJLin179 wrote:I'm a student at the Yale Law School in Connecticut...things are absolutely out of control here. Students dancing on tables, throwing hornbooks at each other, stripping their tees off and running up and down Wall Street in a maddened frenzy. Dean Post kicked in the door to the dining hall (where the most raucous of the gadabouts were cavorting) and demanded silence, only to slam a boombox on the ground and triumphantly proclaim "You mad, Minow?" The music poured forth from the speakers like elixir from the Fountain of Youth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9mFZq-JMfs
The party rages on..as I write prestigious legal minds continue to hoot and holler into the New Haven night
- TTRansfer
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Barrista (JD Preferred)Jaeger wrote:It's pretty easy to get a job at Starbucks.TTRansfer wrote:I am applying for transfer to GW and there is no way that GW's number is accurate. I would be shocked if 94% of the graduates are employed at nine months.Bronck wrote:GWU: 94.3%Jaeger wrote:Can anyone post or PM GWU and/or UMN's 9 month rates? Thanks.
UMN: 91.9%
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I see Ken lurking in the forum.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
We are all clearly under fewer delusions than USNAWR is. These rankings are ridiculous. Emory and W&L: 24?!?!? What the heck??
- Jaeger
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Bronck, can you post UMN's info too?
Thanks, if we ever meet (banking on that never happening) I'll buy you a nice bottle of scotch.
Thanks, if we ever meet (banking on that never happening) I'll buy you a nice bottle of scotch.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
ohai kenBronck wrote:I see Ken lurking in the forum.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
i see hes happy Berk moved up, but disappointed Furd went up as wellBronck wrote:I see Ken lurking in the forum.
-
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:39 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Ya. So. How is Berkeley not out of the top 10 or even 14? They have tied for the lowest peer review and the lowest medians of any of the schools. Do they inefficiently spend tons of money on each student? With their tuition being the highest of all the schools, and the state of CA in general, it would not be entirely surprising.
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Dont forget to cop DAT Jos A Bank shwag.rad lulz wrote:Brb, buying Mont Blancsaschup wrote:Have to apply, bro. It's super preftigious.rad lulz wrote:rad lulz wrote:Aschup where can I join the Pen15 club
- Antilles Haven
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:34 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Conveniently the exact same argument Emory used last year.aschup wrote:TBF even that 80% number is probably shit.romothesavior wrote:This is the thing. The ABA created new rules and no one followed them. Our school did because our dean is like ABA chair elect of the law school division or something, so we're at 80%. Our peers conveniently missed the memo about the new standards and continue to report 95%+. All of our data is the same or better than 2011, but we dropped 5 spots because we followed new protocol.Big Shrimpin wrote:I love how like almos all schools report 90+% employing at 9 months. Lol, just lol.
USNWR and the ABA suck. Thankfully this rankings shit is meaningless.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login