Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by amta » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:31 pm

cannibal ox wrote:Nebby, if you buy enough CLS sweatshirts maybe the money will go towards hiring a fed clerkship adviser for Columbia.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by curry1 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:33 pm

Jaqen wrote:
Nebby wrote:
Jaqen wrote:Chicago left Columbia in the dust in the USNWR rankings and is at the top of the list for employment.

UT displaced the George-whatever Law CenTTTer in USNWR and Vandy's employment stats are probably better than Berzerkeley's.

This Southerner => Chicagoan => Texan is pleased.
You can't be all three of these. Chicago left no one in the dust in USNWR. You're using "employment" in a meaningless sense.
Sorry Columbia has fallen on hard times dude. Darkest just before the dawn, etc. Of course, dawn still probably won't be enough to break back into the HYSC tier.
very excited about Chicago's newfound T4 status. Maybe eventually it will be YSC

Nebby

Diamond
Posts: 31195
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Nebby » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:33 pm

Jaqen wrote:
Nebby wrote:
Jaqen wrote:Chicago left Columbia in the dust in the USNWR rankings and is at the top of the list for employment.

UT displaced the George-whatever Law CenTTTer in USNWR and Vandy's employment stats are probably better than Berzerkeley's.

This Southerner => Chicagoan => Texan is pleased.
You can't be all three of these. Chicago left no one in the dust in USNWR. You're using "employment" in a meaningless sense.
Sorry Columbia has fallen on hard times dude. Darkest just before the dawn, etc. Of course, dawn still probably won't be enough to break back into the HYSC tier.
Doesn't change the fact that you're using employment in a meaningless way

User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by star fox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:36 pm

curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:
curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:I think GULC is out? Screams "Preliminary" everywhere though

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/careers/ ... mary-2.pdf

301 BL + 35 FC with 652 total students = 51.5%

First time it's been above 50% since the ABA started tracking.
still a sinking ttt being outplaced by a regional school in Tennessee
Vandy's always been pretty strong though. From the 2005 stuff, it looks like it was on par with Boalt for NLJ250 stats.

Like Vandy, it seems like GULC actually improved in raw numbers rather than just shrinking its denominator here. It's about 33 more people landing BL+FC than the past 3 years. Kinda odd that we're seeing T13s saturating around the 70s while the lower ranked schools are starting to boost numbers.

There's always going to be a limit in TLS defined placement. There will always be ~10% of the class at almost any t14 who doesn't want to do biglaw and prefers gov or pi. and firms are not going to hire people that are identifiably the bottom of the class (except maybe at HYS)
That's because HYS doesn't do really grades. Particularly Yale where everyone just Passes and looks the same, but at Harvard and Stanford it's either :) or :D , so straight :) and you're still good. Back before the raise, P's Get 160s held (it doesn't rhyme anymore so the whole thing is ruined).

cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by cannibal ox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:37 pm

star fox wrote:Back before the raise, P's Get 160s held (it doesn't rhyme anymore so the whole thing is ruined).
Straight P's get 180 G's

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by curry1 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:38 pm

star fox wrote:
curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:
curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:I think GULC is out? Screams "Preliminary" everywhere though

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/careers/ ... mary-2.pdf

301 BL + 35 FC with 652 total students = 51.5%

First time it's been above 50% since the ABA started tracking.
still a sinking ttt being outplaced by a regional school in Tennessee
Vandy's always been pretty strong though. From the 2005 stuff, it looks like it was on par with Boalt for NLJ250 stats.

Like Vandy, it seems like GULC actually improved in raw numbers rather than just shrinking its denominator here. It's about 33 more people landing BL+FC than the past 3 years. Kinda odd that we're seeing T13s saturating around the 70s while the lower ranked schools are starting to boost numbers.

There's always going to be a limit in TLS defined placement. There will always be ~10% of the class at almost any t14 who doesn't want to do biglaw and prefers gov or pi. and firms are not going to hire people that are identifiably the bottom of the class (except maybe at HYS)
That's because HYS doesn't do really grades. Particularly Yale where everyone just Passes and looks the same, but at Harvard and Stanford it's either :) or :D , so straight :) and you're still good. Back before the raise, P's Get 160s held (it doesn't rhyme anymore so the whole thing is ruined).
Yeah, but H does LP's which people do get so I'm sure there are a few people in the class who are clearly at rock bottom (given its gargantuan class size). YS definitely know what they're doing in terms of just H/P.

User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by star fox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:41 pm

cannibal ox wrote:
star fox wrote:Back before the raise, P's Get 160s held (it doesn't rhyme anymore so the whole thing is ruined).
Straight P's get 180 G's
Checks out.

User avatar
Thomas Hagan, ESQ.

Silver
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Thomas Hagan, ESQ. » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:42 pm

curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:I think GULC is out? Screams "Preliminary" everywhere though

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/careers/ ... mary-2.pdf

301 BL + 35 FC with 652 total students = 51.5%

First time it's been above 50% since the ABA started tracking.
still a sinking ttt being outplaced by a regional school in Tennessee
Calm down there, I wouldn't call it a regional school hahah

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:57 pm

star fox wrote:
curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:
curry1 wrote:
registering wrote:I think GULC is out? Screams "Preliminary" everywhere though

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/careers/ ... mary-2.pdf

301 BL + 35 FC with 652 total students = 51.5%

First time it's been above 50% since the ABA started tracking.
still a sinking ttt being outplaced by a regional school in Tennessee
Vandy's always been pretty strong though. From the 2005 stuff, it looks like it was on par with Boalt for NLJ250 stats.

Like Vandy, it seems like GULC actually improved in raw numbers rather than just shrinking its denominator here. It's about 33 more people landing BL+FC than the past 3 years. Kinda odd that we're seeing T13s saturating around the 70s while the lower ranked schools are starting to boost numbers.

There's always going to be a limit in TLS defined placement. There will always be ~10% of the class at almost any t14 who doesn't want to do biglaw and prefers gov or pi. and firms are not going to hire people that are identifiably the bottom of the class (except maybe at HYS)
That's because HYS doesn't do really grades. Particularly Yale where everyone just Passes and looks the same, but at Harvard and Stanford it's either :) or :D , so straight :) and you're still good. Back before the raise, P's Get 160s held (it doesn't rhyme anymore so the whole thing is ruined).
I thought it was straight P's get 160 G's so as to allow for raises.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


RedPurpleBlue

Silver
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by RedPurpleBlue » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:02 pm

cannibal ox wrote:Nebby, if you buy enough CLS sweatshirts maybe the money will go towards hiring a fed clerkship adviser for Columbia.
I doubt Columbia has a problem getting Fed Clerks due to poor advising. I don't think any of the T13 have serious problems getting Fed Clerks from advising or inability to place their good students. It's likely that the kids who choose Columbia, like the kids who choose to go to NU, are more focused on BL transactional and have no desire to clerk.

People who want to clerk are going to pick schools with high clerkship numbers. Those schools will then have high clerk number when those kids graduate and get jobs, and then students who want to clerk in later cycles will pick them. A lot of it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If a school like Duke, which hasn't gone up in quality drastically in the past year (if it has at all), can increase their clerkship numbers from ~7-8% to ~15%, then it's pretty likely that clerkship numbers at T13 are heavily reliant on self-selection. At T13s with lower clerk numbers, we see these occasional spikes and then subsequent falls to normal levels. And at T13s with high clerk numbers, we see consistently high numbers with less variable spikes. Like I said, that all screams self-selection and seemingly random variance to me.

gilmoregirlrevival

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:12 am

Post by gilmoregirlrevival » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:05 pm

..
Last edited by gilmoregirlrevival on Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by grades?? » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:07 pm

RedPurpleBlue wrote:
cannibal ox wrote:Nebby, if you buy enough CLS sweatshirts maybe the money will go towards hiring a fed clerkship adviser for Columbia.
I doubt Columbia has a problem getting Fed Clerks due to poor advising. I don't think any of the T13 have serious problems getting Fed Clerks from advising or inability to place their good students. It's likely that the kids who choose Columbia, like the kids who choose to go to NU, are more focused on BL transactional and have no desire to clerk.

People who want to clerk are going to pick schools with high clerkship numbers. Those schools will then have high clerk number when those kids graduate and get jobs, and then students who want to clerk in later cycles will pick them. A lot of it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If a school like Duke, which hasn't gone up in quality drastically in the past year (if it has at all), can increase their clerkship numbers from ~7-8% to ~15%, then it's pretty likely that clerkship numbers at T13 are heavily reliant on self-selection. At T13s with lower clerk numbers, we see these occasional spikes and then subsequent falls to normal levels. And at T13s with high clerk numbers, we see consistently high numbers with less variable spikes. Like I said, that all screams self-selection and seemingly random variance to me.
For Duke however, I think the new norm will be the 15%+ numbers. This was the first data set with our new clerkship staff at Duke. They have really turned it around. Before, if you wanted to clerk, it was essentially on you. Now, Duke has multiple full time staff working purely on clerkships for students. So I think in that way its not self-selection. I know a bunch of people who wanted to clerk but couldn't get help with the process with the administration before the new clerkship staff took over. It is night and day. It is institutional support that can make a real significant difference in clerkship numbers.

cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by cannibal ox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:07 pm

Jesus, I was trolling Nebby. Can we not start this stupid CLS/clerking defense again?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by star fox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:12 pm

I think the most logical reason is when judges see Columbia on the resume of an applicant they have a good laugh before automatically throwing it away. With the USNWR disaster I only expect it to get worse.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by BigZuck » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:25 pm

Columbia: "Hey, at least we're not NYU!"

Big Red

Gold
Posts: 3294
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:29 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Big Red » Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:27 pm

Hey Texas

[youtube]NwwY9y6O3hw[/youtube]

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by cannibal ox » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:11 pm

COLUMBIA AT 4.8% FED CLERKS

NEBBY IN RUINS

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:13 pm

star fox wrote:I think the most logical reason is when judges see Columbia on the resume of an applicant they have a good laugh before automatically throwing it away. With the USNWR disaster I only expect it to get worse.
I figure it's the combination of not being able to hire non-citizens and the Columbia/Colombia confusion.

registering

New
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:41 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by registering » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:35 pm

Top 20 just missing NYU, Boalt, Texas, and USC now I think.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by BigZuck » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:38 pm

Never 4get:
Nebby wrote:You should use this data in deciding what schools provide the best shot at biglaw or clerkships. The only outlier of the general placement trend is CLS, which has a subpar clerkship office, but anyone with good grades and hustle can still land clerkships.
The only outlier.

The only one!

That's it, just Columbia!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by BigZuck » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:38 pm

registering wrote:Top 20 just missing NYU, Boalt, Texas, and USC now I think.
Texas will be insta-booted from the T20 when it embarrasses itself/us ITT

registering

New
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:41 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by registering » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:39 pm

BigZuck wrote:
registering wrote:Top 20 just missing NYU, Boalt, Texas, and USC now I think.
Texas will be insta-booted from the T20 when it embarrasses itself/us ITT
TTTexas confirmed

User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Post by Lavitz » Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:42 pm

Nebby wrote:
Jaqen wrote:Chicago left Columbia in the dust in the USNWR rankings and is at the top of the list for employment.
You're using "employment" in a meaningless sense.
Columbia finally gets to top of the "list for employment."

List is meaningless.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”