but the movie was supposed to be set at chicago and harvard snatched it up trying to use lay prestige to distract people from the diluted faculty. the only reason harvard is ranked so high is lay prestige, yale because all the peer reputation scorers went there for law school, stanford because it benefits from california's low bar passage rate (did you know US News punishes schools in states with easy exams like Illinois?!), and columbia--well, it's just a matter of time before chicago leaps over them. based on my quick number crunching, i'd say about about 80% chance it leaps over CLS next year, 5% it leaps over SLS and HLS.neonx wrote:Stanford Law is going crazy about the rankings right now!
SO PUMPED.
all in good fun
2013 Rankings Forum
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Last edited by soj on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- NZA
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:01 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
The (fucking awful) brief I'm (not) writing right now may be the sole reason for M's drop.
I take full responsibility.
I take full responsibility.
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Detailed Michigan Info anyone?
-
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:54 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
I can't see some of the info on the chart because i don't have an account with the Law School Compass. Could someone be so kind to post the last column (Graduates known to be employed after 9 months) for those of us who can't see it? Or could someone be so kind to PM me and I'll let you know the handful of schools I'm curious about?
Thanks!
Thanks!
- thexfactor
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Bronck wrote:Illinois:illini22 wrote:Illinois numebers please. Im curious as to what numbers were used and how much we got punished in score.
Score 64
Peer assessment score (out of 5) 3.1
Assessment score by lawyers/judges (out of 5) 3.8
GPA (25th-75th percentile) 3.38-3.85
Median undergraduate GPA for all program entrants 3.70
LSAT scores (25th-75th percentile) 156-168
Median LSAT score for all program entrants 163
Graduates known to be employed nine months after graduation 87.2%
wait a min... isn't that wrong?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
Teh lulz, obviJaeger wrote:So...
the purpose of this thread is to comment on why the rankings don't matter and if you say anything else, you're attacked?
So then, why the thread?
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Look back like three pages ago dude.moneybagsphd wrote:Detailed Michigan Info anyone?
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
WFU:Gail wrote:WFU and I'll leave, thanks!
Score 59
Peer assessment score (out of 5) 3.1
Assessment score by lawyers/judges (out of 5) 3.7
GPA (25th-75th percentile) 3.2-3.8
Median undergraduate GPA for all program entrants 3.60
LSAT scores (25th-75th percentile) 160-164
Median LSAT score for all program entrants 163
Graduates known to be employed nine months after graduation 83.2%
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:29 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Does anyone know where I can find the U.S. News guidelines that they were trying to get adopted for employment? Can anyone verify that some of these schools chose to adopt these guidelines (be more honest)? From what I am seeing there is a disparity that makes absolutely no sense with employment... schools like UNC and WUSTL got fucked when you look at medians/reputation scores/etc. I am guessing this means that they were the more honest of the bunch. Some of these fluctuations looks like absolute nonsense compared to the changes in prior years.
- ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Can someone find the average rankings of the T-14 over the past 10 years (or something similar)? I know i've seen something like that floating around, can't find it though.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:23 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
BU Info please
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:56 am
Re: The official rankings release thread
Blindmelon wrote:lol at GW (56%) and Emory having below 60% employment rates and being ranked well above Fordham, BU, BC. What the hell are these rankings supposed to measure anyway?
My thoughts exactly!!
- WonkyPanda
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Data on Boalt, please!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mattviphky
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:43 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
No. They had reported a MEDIAN of 168thexfactor wrote:Bronck wrote:Illinois:illini22 wrote:Illinois numebers please. Im curious as to what numbers were used and how much we got punished in score.
Score 64
Peer assessment score (out of 5) 3.1
Assessment score by lawyers/judges (out of 5) 3.8
GPA (25th-75th percentile) 3.38-3.85
Median undergraduate GPA for all program entrants 3.70
LSAT scores (25th-75th percentile) 156-168
Median LSAT score for all program entrants 163
Graduates known to be employed nine months after graduation 87.2%
wait a min... isn't that wrong?
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:56 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Thanks Bronck...you made my evening!
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
.
Last edited by rad lulz on Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- flyingduck
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Looks like Illinois dropped off the deep end. 23=>35 

Last edited by flyingduck on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
I've got the link on my comp but poasting on iPhone now. Will poast tomorrow if nobody else finds it.ph14 wrote:Can someone find the average rankings of the T-14 over the past 10 years (or something similar)? I know i've seen something like that floating around, can't find it though.
- Bronck
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
BU:DevilDaze wrote:BU Info please
Score 67
Peer assessment score (out of 5) 3.4
Assessment score by lawyers/judges (out of 5) 3.8
GPA (25th-75th percentile) 3.5-3.78
Median undergraduate GPA for all program entrants 3.72
LSAT scores (25th-75th percentile) 163-167
Median LSAT score for all program entrants 167
Graduates known to be employed nine months after graduation 86.8%
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
For being the only school in our range to report employment data according to new ABA standards. USNWR doesn't give a shit about vetting that process. We knew we were gonna fall, and I'm glad we did for all the right reasons. Our stats may still be inflated a bit, but we are doing the right thing and moving in the right direction. This has zero impact on the school or our hiring, and once the ABA cracks the whip on everyone else we will be back up to where we belong.chimp wrote:Wustl got pwned
And I think I speak for everyone at the school on this one. No one is losing any sleep over it and we all understand and appreciate the reason for the drop.
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:07 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
Thank you Bronck!
Some schools really plummeted. Look at W&M.
Some schools really plummeted. Look at W&M.
Last edited by pret on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:56 am
Re: The official rankings release thread
InGoodFaith wrote:Must be their lack of adequate library space.TTRansfer wrote:BC and BU seem to be really low for the solid numbers they seem to have for employment.col.faith wrote:What did UW do to deserve the 10-spot climb? Bribed usnews? With BU,BC,Fordham all clustered around 30, the ranking outside the T14 is becoming more arbitrary every year.
Lmaooo. Cooley Logic.
- moneybagsphd
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
assessment scores?TemporarySaint wrote:Look back like three pages ago dude.moneybagsphd wrote:Detailed Michigan Info anyone?
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm
Re: Predicting 2013 Rankings
UNLV and ASU please.
- TLS_noobie
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: The official rankings release thread
No...it is because of their crap websites obviously...PinkRevolver wrote:InGoodFaith wrote:Must be their lack of adequate library space.TTRansfer wrote:BC and BU seem to be really low for the solid numbers they seem to have for employment.col.faith wrote:What did UW do to deserve the 10-spot climb? Bribed usnews? With BU,BC,Fordham all clustered around 30, the ranking outside the T14 is becoming more arbitrary every year.
Lmaooo. Cooley Logic.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login