Wasn't exactly leaked.. USNWR published it as a sneek peak.qwertyboard wrote:it was leaked that members of the top 10 group remain the same.. I bet that Penn and Berkley will change positions.. does it matter? no
2014 Rankings Released Forum
-
curious66

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
-
qwertyboard

- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:03 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
that's right
- ms9

- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Law School deans have them (I do not). But I do know based on a VERY brief email I just received that at first glance there were no major, or indeed perhaps no, methodological changes. So I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.
- Sheffield

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:07 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Thought I might get lucky at B&N (Rittenhouse Square), but it is not there yet. Ohhhh well.
-
Jeremyl

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:47 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
I thought they were adding some new employment numbers, no?MikeSpivey wrote:Law School deans have them (I do not). But I do know based on a VERY brief email I just received that at first glance there were no major, or indeed perhaps no, methodological changes. So I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somewhatwayward

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Aren't you already in law school? Why do you care about getting it so early?Sheffield wrote:Thought I might get lucky at B&N (Rittenhouse Square), but it is not there yet. Ohhhh well.
- ms9

- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Well, I think there may have been some employment changes in the methodology but until I actually see the rankings I don't want to guess.Jeremyl wrote:I thought they were adding some new employment numbers, no?MikeSpivey wrote:Law School deans have them (I do not). But I do know based on a VERY brief email I just received that at first glance there were no major, or indeed perhaps no, methodological changes. So I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.
I imagine they will be leaked by someone in the next few hours as historically that seems par for the course.
- Sheffield

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:07 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Hard to say other than to see if we made T6.somewhatwayward wrote:Aren't you already in law school? Why do you care about getting it so early?Sheffield wrote:Thought I might get lucky at B&N (Rittenhouse Square), but it is not there yet. Ohhhh well.
-
Big Dog

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Is that any different than any other year, Mike?I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.
-
wannabelawstudent

- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Yeah dude it's not going be for sale in print for another month.Sheffield wrote:Thought I might get lucky at B&N (Rittenhouse Square), but it is not there yet. Ohhhh well.
- ms9

- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
NopeBig Dog wrote:Is that any different than any other year, Mike?I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.
- togepi

- Posts: 533
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 10:13 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Should be a shitshow thatll make a tuesday go by faster at work
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
I cant tell who is joking and who is not. But for those who are not, why do you actually give a shit what the order of the T10 schools is? We know its the same schools, do you think if a couple schools switch spots it will actually make a difference? Most people going to law school are at least a little rational...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Aroldis105

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:38 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Even a celibate man wants a big dick.AssumptionRequired wrote:I cant tell who is joking and who is not. But for those who are not, why do you actually give a shit what the order of the T10 schools is? We know its the same schools, do you think if a couple schools switch spots it will actually make a difference? Most people going to law school are at least a little rational...
- star fox

- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Why does Michigan constantly out-rank Northwestern? The latter has way better job placement. I personally view Michigan as being a lower T14 while Northwestern has the feel of a middle T14. Anyone know what accounts for US News ranking them higher?
- pedestrian

- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Assumes facts not in evidenceAssumptionRequired wrote:I cant tell who is joking and who is not. But for those who are not, why do you actually give a shit what the order of the T10 schools is? We know its the same schools, do you think if a couple schools switch spots it will actually make a difference? Most people going to law school are at least a little rational...
- star fox

- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Again? I know they got beat up really badly with that whole lying and gaming the system thing. Are they still getting screwed for that or is it more a result of bad job placement?MikeSpivey wrote:NopeBig Dog wrote:Is that any different than any other year, Mike?I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.Word is that Illinois got slammed. Not much movement at all in T-14.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- star fox

- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
When people say ties are they just referring to where you're from? (i.e. if you're from New York originally and have family there you have a way better shot at getting a NYC BigLaw job than someone who is originally from Maryland)rad lulz wrote:NopeJamesDean1955 wrote:I think we can all agree that if a graduate is able to secure a position at any hard to attain PI job (whether that's 100% of all PI jobs, or 90%, etc.), said graduate would have been able to attain biglaw and/or an AIII clerkship.
Big firms look at two things primarily - grades/ties
Public interest orgs may care about grades to some degree, but depending on who is doing the hiring, commitment and experience may be more valuable as well as network to even get you the interview
Goddamn 0Ls
- kingjones59

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
NYC is actually where ties matter the least, if at all. If you were born and raised NYC you are actually at a disadvantage compared to everyone else, as you have no ties to secondary markets.
- AMilfordMan

- Posts: 245
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:28 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Class of 2015 medians took a pretty good hit. That certainly didn't help. As I've read elsewhere though, it's hard to believe Illinois would drop any lower than Wisconsin or Ohio State given their similar medians but UIUCs superior placement.john7234797 wrote:Again? I know they got beat up really badly with that whole lying and gaming the system thing. Are they still getting screwed for that or is it more a result of bad job placement?MikeSpivey wrote:NopeBig Dog wrote:Is that any different than any other year, Mike?I do not anticipate anything crazy outside of perhaps a few schools not gaming this year and a few schools gaming to the nth degree.Word is that Illinois got slammed. Not much movement at all in T-14.
-
law2015

- Posts: 398
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:29 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
LOL at UIUC!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Rankings are based on things other than job placement?john7234797 wrote:Why does Michigan constantly out-rank Northwestern? The latter has way better job placement. I personally view Michigan as being a lower T14 while Northwestern has the feel of a middle T14. Anyone know what accounts for US News ranking them higher?
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
And your personal views.rad lulz wrote:Rankings are based on things other than job placement?john7234797 wrote:Why does Michigan constantly out-rank Northwestern? The latter has way better job placement. I personally view Michigan as being a lower T14 while Northwestern has the feel of a middle T14. Anyone know what accounts for US News ranking them higher?
-
btp

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:29 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
What is the story with UIUC and this "gaming" everyone is speaking of? Is it one of those things where everyone probably does it, but UIUC were the only ones to get caught? I know Baylor got in trouble a while back, but I don't know the stories behind these schools.
- alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/09/another- ... -in-a-lie/btp wrote:What is the story with UIUC and this "gaming" everyone is speaking of? Is it one of those things where everyone probably does it, but UIUC were the only ones to get caught? I know Baylor got in trouble a while back, but I don't know the stories behind these schools.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login