I didn't literally mean open enrollment. 50% and 152/3.2 medians is effectively open enrollment, I would say.Brut wrote:are they open enrollment?Will_McAvoy wrote:Again, this is not happening in a vacuum. Idaho law is open enrollment. Someone with legit credentials is more likely to clean up than not.Brut wrote:someone who has a strong desire to become a lawyer should not attend a school that gives them a 50% chance of doing so
their 509 says 653 apps and 364 offers
unless i'm misunderstanding what open enrollment means?
The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame Forum
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:28 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Why are you so angry? I'm just pointing out that it's not a terrible financial decision which is what I thought we were debating.Brut wrote:it's great how you're missing the pointmuskies970 wrote:In sum. Approximately and based on averages
50% chance of being 60k in debt and "wasting" 3 years of life
50% chance of being 60k in debt but making 500k+ more over the course of a career.
people don't go to law school to play roulette
it's not like you fail to find employment after law school and say, oh well, guess it's onto the next thing
you go to law school because you have a strong desire to become a lawyer
that is what you want to do with your life
even if the positive outcome far outweighs the negative outcome
someone who has a strong desire to become a lawyer should not attend a school that gives them a 50% chance of doing so
Looking at it purely from this new position you're defending, becoming a lawyer, I would suggest a slight modification to becoming a lawyer in Idaho. In that case, it seems to be the general consensus that Idaho for law school
Is the highest chance albeit not a guarantee. If you're only advice then is don't do anything unless you have a certain threshold of certainty fine, but I think that's a bit outrageous. Life is a series of risks that can be lessened through hard work. It's not a literal spin of the roulette wheel a lot of it will be hustling/ studying hard while at uIdaho.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
re: nony
but my point was that the goal itself seems very risky
over the course of the argument we shifted into different territory about retaking and other markets, etc., but my main point is that the risk of failure seems awfully high
also, we don't know op's calculation here
how strongly he wants to become a practicing lawyer vs how strongly he wants to stay in idaho
he says that ultimately he wants to stay in idaho, but i think we can assume that ultimately he wants to become a lawyer as well
obviously those aren't incompatible, but he may need to prioritize one when making this decision (assuming he hasn't already matriculated)
but my point was that the goal itself seems very risky
over the course of the argument we shifted into different territory about retaking and other markets, etc., but my main point is that the risk of failure seems awfully high
also, we don't know op's calculation here
how strongly he wants to become a practicing lawyer vs how strongly he wants to stay in idaho
he says that ultimately he wants to stay in idaho, but i think we can assume that ultimately he wants to become a lawyer as well
obviously those aren't incompatible, but he may need to prioritize one when making this decision (assuming he hasn't already matriculated)
- PepperJack
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
The issue isn't, like some have said, that you can't be a good lawyer coming out of a shitty school. The issue is you may never have the chance to be. Helping Johnny get his 60 in a school zone reduced to points isn't going to get you on CNN. In the baby boomer era there was a shortage of lawyers so talent and work ethic won out. These things still matter, but only half of all lawyers will be in a position where talent and work ethic are applicable. It's not elitist, it's objective logic. Ignoring the objective for the subjective is elitist.
-
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Brut wrote:it's great how you're missing the pointmuskies970 wrote:In sum. Approximately and based on averages
50% chance of being 60k in debt and "wasting" 3 years of life
50% chance of being 60k in debt but making 500k+ more over the course of a career.
people don't go to law school to play roulette
it's not like you fail to find employment after law school and say, oh well, guess it's onto the next thing
you go to law school because you have a strong desire to become a lawyer
that is what you want to do with your life
even if the positive outcome far outweighs the negative outcome
someone who has a strong desire to become a lawyer should not attend a school that gives them a 50% chance of doing so
Stop.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
1) 60K is exaggerated. Have you been to Idaho? You can find a great apartment for $500. Cut that in half if you have a roommate. Cost of living is dirt cheap.
2) Some of the incoming students that go to these rural schools have plans to work as solos coming into law school. They return to their hometowns and hang a shingle right away.
3) Many students don't enter practice right away. There are many students, who are in the late 20s and early 30s, who decide to have kids during 3L and raise their kids. That skews employment stats.
You're from the east coast. Dont be on here talking about something you have no clue about. LST isn't gospel. There is more to those numbers that meets the eye in some situations.
Last edited by 6lehderjets on Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
why do you think i'm angry?muskies970 wrote:Why are you so angry? I'm just pointing out that it's not a terrible financial decision which is what I thought we were debating.Brut wrote:it's great how you're missing the pointmuskies970 wrote:In sum. Approximately and based on averages
50% chance of being 60k in debt and "wasting" 3 years of life
50% chance of being 60k in debt but making 500k+ more over the course of a career.
people don't go to law school to play roulette
it's not like you fail to find employment after law school and say, oh well, guess it's onto the next thing
you go to law school because you have a strong desire to become a lawyer
that is what you want to do with your life
even if the positive outcome far outweighs the negative outcome
someone who has a strong desire to become a lawyer should not attend a school that gives them a 50% chance of doing so
Looking at it purely from this new position you're defending, becoming a lawyer, I would suggest a slight modification to becoming a lawyer in Idaho. In that case, it seems to be the general consensus that Idaho for law school
Is the highest chance albeit not a guarantee. If you're only advice then is don't do anything unless you have a certain threshold of certainty fine, but I think that's a bit outrageous. Life is a series of risks that can be lessened through hard work. It's not a literal spin of the roulette wheel a lot of it will be hustling/ studying hard while at uIdaho.
i'm more incredulous at the audacity of your arguments than anything
maybe that's coming across as angry, if so, i apologize
read my last response to you again, carefully
i was writing about framing the decision in purely financial terms vs in terms of one's career
the roulette analogy was in reference to your argument which framed the issue as risk/reward, lifetime earnings vs debt + no job
you win big or you lose big
i was arguing there's a deeper motive, a desire to become a lawyer
so even if my 'loss' doesn't devastate me financially, it would in terms of my career goals
also, like i said above, my issue is the goal itself, and op needs to think about the relative weight that all these factors have on his decision
example:
ultimately i want to end up in nyc
for me (and not necessarily for op, but for me) that's where i want to work/live
but my desire to go to law school and become a lawyer ultimately trumps that
i'm young(ish), not tied down, etc
so if my options are ut vs touro, i pack up my bags and head to austin
i'm not saying op has to make the exact same calculation i would make
what i am saying, however, is that op should reevaluate his goals in light of the available employment data
his current goals are risky and i think competing factors could outweigh the geography rationale
if he looks at the data and still decides staying in idaho is worth it, fine
but i suspect that may not be the case
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
oh please6lehderjets wrote:Stop.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
1) 60K is exaggerated. Have you been to Idaho? You can find a great apartment for $500. Cut that in half if you have a roommate. Cost of living is dirt cheap.
stop embarrassing yourself
those numbers are from the school itself
for col + books, transportation and other expenses
then recalculated to included cost inflation, loan fees, and interest
they're not pulled out of the air
maybe you can get the number lower, but that's what the school apparently thinks you need
and i trust them more than i trust you
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
i'll concede that i think the lst calculation is high by a few thousand
but by no more
i'll do the math itt if enough people are interested
but by no more
i'll do the math itt if enough people are interested
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
oh great!6lehderjets wrote:[2) Some of the incoming students that go to these rural schools have plans to work as solos coming into law school. They return to their hometowns and hang a shingle right away.
now we're up to 62% employment!
it's funny when people try to argue against numbers
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/Brut wrote:oh please6lehderjets wrote:Stop.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
1) 60K is exaggerated. Have you been to Idaho? You can find a great apartment for $500. Cut that in half if you have a roommate. Cost of living is dirt cheap.
stop embarrassing yourself
those numbers are from the school itself
for col + books, transportation and other expenses
then recalculated to included cost inflation, loan fees, and interest
they're not pulled out of the air
maybe you can get the number lower, but that's what the school apparently thinks you need
and i trust them more than i trust you
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
ok!Will_McAvoy wrote:Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/Brut wrote:oh please6lehderjets wrote:Stop.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
1) 60K is exaggerated. Have you been to Idaho? You can find a great apartment for $500. Cut that in half if you have a roommate. Cost of living is dirt cheap.
stop embarrassing yourself
those numbers are from the school itself
for col + books, transportation and other expenses
then recalculated to included cost inflation, loan fees, and interest
they're not pulled out of the air
maybe you can get the number lower, but that's what the school apparently thinks you need
and i trust them more than i trust you
i'll do the math!

-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
well saidPepperJack wrote:The issue isn't, like some have said, that you can't be a good lawyer coming out of a shitty school. The issue is you may never have the chance to be. Helping Johnny get his 60 in a school zone reduced to points isn't going to get you on CNN. In the baby boomer era there was a shortage of lawyers so talent and work ethic won out. These things still matter, but only half of all lawyers will be in a position where talent and work ethic are applicable. It's not elitist, it's objective logic. Ignoring the objective for the subjective is elitist.
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Said for the first time ever about a Pepperjack postBrut wrote:well saidPepperJack wrote:The issue isn't, like some have said, that you can't be a good lawyer coming out of a shitty school. The issue is you may never have the chance to be. Helping Johnny get his 60 in a school zone reduced to points isn't going to get you on CNN. In the baby boomer era there was a shortage of lawyers so talent and work ethic won out. These things still matter, but only half of all lawyers will be in a position where talent and work ethic are applicable. It's not elitist, it's objective logic. Ignoring the objective for the subjective is elitist.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
by how much?6lehderjets wrote:3) Many students don't enter practice right away. There are many students, who are in the late 20s and early 30s, who decide to have kids during 3L and raise their kids. That skews employment stats.
because i've been arguing with numbers and data
can you do the same, or is this like, a 'gut feeling'
surely some students do that, but i highly doubt enough to move the needle in a significant way
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
these are the OFFICIAL numbers directly from the u idaho website
Room & Board $9,692
Books & Supplies $1,232
Transportation $1,106
Miscellaneous & Personal $3,786
that'll be a total of $15,816
now what about that cost inflation
lst says a modest 2%
1L: $15,816
2L: $16,132
3L: $16,454
now lets talk loan fees
all stafford bc under 20.5k
so a very modest 1.072
1L: $170 | $15,986 total so far
2L: $173 | $16,305 total so far
3L: $176 | $16,630 total so far
now interest
we'll assume a september start date and a may end date + six month deferment
that's 39 months
what will these loans look like at repayment?
1L: $19,444
2L: $18,672
3L: $17,931
$56,047
Room & Board $9,692
Books & Supplies $1,232
Transportation $1,106
Miscellaneous & Personal $3,786
that'll be a total of $15,816
now what about that cost inflation
lst says a modest 2%
1L: $15,816
2L: $16,132
3L: $16,454
now lets talk loan fees
all stafford bc under 20.5k
so a very modest 1.072
1L: $170 | $15,986 total so far
2L: $173 | $16,305 total so far
3L: $176 | $16,630 total so far
now interest
we'll assume a september start date and a may end date + six month deferment
that's 39 months
what will these loans look like at repayment?
1L: $19,444
2L: $18,672
3L: $17,931
$56,047
6lehderjets wrote:1) 60K is exaggerated.
6lehderjets wrote:1) 60K is exaggerated.
6lehderjets wrote:1) 60K is exaggerated.
6lehderjets wrote:1) 60K is exaggerated.
6lehderjets wrote:1) 60K is exaggerated.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
what does it matter that i'm from the east coast?6lehderjets wrote:You're from the east coast. Dont be on here talking about something you have no clue about. LST isn't gospel. There is more to those numbers that meets the eye in some situations.
am i incapable of looking up data about a school in idaho because i'm from new york?
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
actually if we do an apples to apples comparison (i'm including books, transportation, misc in my numbers)Will_McAvoy wrote:Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/
ut is $19,446
vs
idaho's $15,816
lst reflects that as well
they predict full-ride idaho owes $61,214 at graduation vs $74,136 full-ride ut
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Bro, there are better ways to procrastinate than digging your heels in on an internet argument. You hungry? Want a snickers?
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
ugh i do have so much work to do
but i'm not digging in my heels really
i'm open to being proven wrong
just looking for facts though, not conjecture





but i'm not digging in my heels really
i'm open to being proven wrong
just looking for facts though, not conjecture
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
You said a page back that Idaho's website budgeted 20K a year, so that's where my statement came from.Brut wrote:actually if we do an apples to apples comparison (i'm including books, transportation, misc in my numbers)Will_McAvoy wrote:Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/
ut is $19,446
vs
idaho's $15,816
lst reflects that as well
they predict full-ride idaho owes $61,214 at graduation vs $74,136 full-ride ut
Austin costs a fuck ton more than 19K a year, especially when including all academic expenses (to the point about these projections being very arbitrary and generally stupid).
Last edited by McAvoy on Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- eriedoctrine
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 1:00 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Notre Dame is probably the more recognized school.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
the 60k number was in reference to non-tuition costs according to idaho's website, then recalculated to include fees, interest, and cost inflationWill_McAvoy wrote:You said a page back that Idaho's website budgeted 20K a year, so that's where my statement came from.Brut wrote:actually if we do an apples to apples comparison (i'm including books, transportation, misc in my numbers)Will_McAvoy wrote:Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/
ut is $19,446
vs
idaho's $15,816
lst reflects that as well
they predict full-ride idaho owes $61,214 at graduation vs $74,136 full-ride ut
Austin costs a fuck ton more than 19K a year, especially when including all academic expenses (to the point about these projections being very arbitrary and generally stupid).
i wasn't intending to suggest that room and board alone was 20k yearly
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
i thought your comment was funny before you scrubbed iteriedoctrine wrote:Notre Dame is probably the more recognized school.
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
also i don't think i said col would be 60k or 20k/yearly actually
- McAvoy
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: The University of Idaho v. Notre Dame
Gotcha. At any rate, OP is not a real person, so let's just call this good until U of I comes up in a real choosing thread later this cycle.Brut wrote:the 60k number was in reference to non-tuition costs according to idaho's website, then recalculated to include fees, interest, and cost inflationWill_McAvoy wrote:You said a page back that Idaho's website budgeted 20K a year, so that's where my statement came from.Brut wrote:actually if we do an apples to apples comparison (i'm including books, transportation, misc in my numbers)Will_McAvoy wrote:Come one, you know that's a bad piece of data to point at. These are notoriously arbitrary and inconsistent across schools. You're arguing that, for example, because UT and Idaho have the same COL budget, the cities have comparable real-life COL? https://www.utexas.edu/law/finaid/costs/
ut is $19,446
vs
idaho's $15,816
lst reflects that as well
they predict full-ride idaho owes $61,214 at graduation vs $74,136 full-ride ut
Austin costs a fuck ton more than 19K a year, especially when including all academic expenses (to the point about these projections being very arbitrary and generally stupid).
i wasn't intending to suggest that room and board alone was 20k yearly
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login