Im going to law school from being a car salesman! It sucked. Hours like the biglaw everyone describes but substantially less pay. Like 50-70k.kalvano wrote:You should happily go to law school before doing that job. It is also 100% not 9-5. More like 8-8, 6 days a week.anyriotgirl wrote:paralegal, plumber, welder, car salesman, garbageman, human resources, office manager, etc. can all make 60k+ eventuallyjk148706 wrote:Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house?
tag on the off chance someone has an answer
The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers Forum
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:10 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
- emitremmus
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Amen.baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
emitremmus wrote:Amen.baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:46 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I guess we should all move to France. Or Cleveland.emitremmus wrote:Amen.baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:36 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.
Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I don't disagree. But I thought I wanted to be a philosophy professor. Lol. When I saw JD statistics saying half of graduates on average get jobs, that sounded amazing at first.lecsa wrote:Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.
Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?burtsbees wrote:Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.
Finally, one thing you really can't account for as a 0L is how law school changes you. Like most graduates, I don't think law school was all that valuable beyond serving its function of conferring a credential. One thing law schools do well is teaching students how to issue spot. At its core, issue spotting is about recognizing problems in a given fact pattern. New grads essentially graduate trained to find things that are wrong with law school and the legal profession. You should hardly be surprised that this group feels so strongly about these issues. Once you graduate and start practicing you'll understand this much better.
- KatyMarie
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:16 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I was going to be an English professorOtunga wrote:I don't disagree. But I thought I wanted to be a philosophy professor. Lol. When I saw JD statistics saying half of graduates on average get jobs, that sounded amazing at first.lecsa wrote:Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.
Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.

-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
.
Last edited by 20170322 on Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.nouseforaname123 wrote:Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?burtsbees wrote:Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,
"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."
Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
It's reasonable to call it misogyny. I thought it was funny, though. Cleveland could feel equally as outed.burtsbees wrote:Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,
"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."
Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
France! No shit. That new "no work email outside of 9am-6pm" law is golden.* I don't understand why America essentially has only three employment options:jimbeam21 wrote:I guess we should all move to France. Or Cleveland.emitremmus wrote:Amen.baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
1. Career path with reasonable hours, low(ish) pay that requires no education or specific talent at entry level.
2. Career path with horrible hours, but high pay that requires significant education or talent from the beginning.
3. Career path with horrible hours and low pay, with or without education/talent.
Why can't I be over-educated, work reasonable hours and max out in the low 100k range.
*Damnit! I just went to find a link for this, only to find out the media got it all wrong. No such law was passed in France. So . . . about Cleveland.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I think you're misunderstanding the consensus among grads though. No one is saying "No one should go." When someone says "Ugh, 0L's are really resistant to being told not to go" that doesn't mean that EVERY 0L should be told not to go. The ones who get told "don't go" are usually the really delusional ones who think that taking on six figures of debt at a TTT is a good idea and won't retake the LSAT because they "don't test well."burtsbees wrote:
That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
It was stupid hyperbole that pointlessly alienates a chunk of your audience. But go ahead with your straw man rant.burtsbees wrote:Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,
"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."
Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
If you are bald and flabby, and have a shitty personality and are a shitty person, no one will love you period.JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
My pretty attractive friend is doing her last year of residency at UCI med. Her fiance is an "artist" but he's a great person to be around. It's not the 70s anymore. Women can be and are often the breadwinners.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Aint nothin but sumthinta doTelegramSam wrote:The ontopics are such a cesspool. I don't even know why people like Rayiner and Rad lulz et al still try
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I'm not sure if you're missing the thrust of my post or I failed to properly communicate, so let's try again.burtsbees wrote:That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.nouseforaname123 wrote:Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?burtsbees wrote:Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.
1. Law is not exceptional in terms of excitement--especially if your goal is to make lots of money as a lawyer. ITT, you seem to be emphasizing a legal career as a refuge from "average, boring jobs."
2. You're correct that most (all) fields require personal sacrifice and stress to achieve economic success. Nobody debates that. The other thread that inspired this thread also discussed other factors that 0Ls don't typically account for when deciding to attend law school. Not all stress and personal sacrifice is the same.
- worldtraveler
- Posts: 8676
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
This thread is apparently only about how men should be lawyers because it's the only way to attract a hot wife with your shit personality.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I can see why you're bitter. I'd be too if I were bald and flabby.JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
The point is, if you're a bald, flabby, shitty lawyer with a golddigger wife, you'd probably be a bald, flabby, shitty doctor with a golddigger wife too, had you chosen that route. Or a bald, flabby, shitty...you get the point.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- aboutmydaylight
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Sounds like the American dream.JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
-
- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:21 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Lovely 0L confirmation bias stroking here.
- Kikero
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Mail order brides, bro. There are plenty of hot chicks that'll be happy to marry you for a chance to live in God's great country of 'Murica.JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd.
- anyriotgirl
- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
the fundamental problem with burtsbees is that he keeps on changing his position depending on who/what he is responding to
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login