The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
Jdempewo

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:10 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Jdempewo » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:27 pm

kalvano wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
jk148706 wrote:
Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house?

tag on the off chance someone has an answer
paralegal, plumber, welder, car salesman, garbageman, human resources, office manager, etc. can all make 60k+ eventually
You should happily go to law school before doing that job. It is also 100% not 9-5. More like 8-8, 6 days a week.
Im going to law school from being a car salesman! It sucked. Hours like the biglaw everyone describes but substantially less pay. Like 50-70k.

User avatar
emitremmus

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:28 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by emitremmus » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:29 pm

baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
Amen.

User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by ManoftheHour » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:37 pm

emitremmus wrote:
baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
Amen.

jimbeam21

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by jimbeam21 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:54 pm

emitremmus wrote:
baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
Amen.
I guess we should all move to France. Or Cleveland.

lecsa

Bronze
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:36 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by lecsa » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:04 pm

Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.

Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.

Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Otunga

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Otunga » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:12 pm

lecsa wrote:
Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.

Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.

Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.
I don't disagree. But I thought I wanted to be a philosophy professor. Lol. When I saw JD statistics saying half of graduates on average get jobs, that sounded amazing at first.

nouseforaname123

Bronze
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by nouseforaname123 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:13 pm

burtsbees wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?

I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.

Finally, one thing you really can't account for as a 0L is how law school changes you. Like most graduates, I don't think law school was all that valuable beyond serving its function of conferring a credential. One thing law schools do well is teaching students how to issue spot. At its core, issue spotting is about recognizing problems in a given fact pattern. New grads essentially graduate trained to find things that are wrong with law school and the legal profession. You should hardly be surprised that this group feels so strongly about these issues. Once you graduate and start practicing you'll understand this much better.

User avatar
KatyMarie

Silver
Posts: 616
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:16 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by KatyMarie » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:22 pm

Otunga wrote:
lecsa wrote:
Otunga wrote:Where are these 9-5 jobs that pay 60k+ and allow you to buy a 4 bedroom house? Particularly, where are they for all the humanities majors applying to law school?
Not for humanities majors but accounting/ big 4 pays that starting.

Finance and accounting from good undergrads are probably a lot better than law.

Its really your fault for studying humanities. Not like business is difficult.
I don't disagree. But I thought I wanted to be a philosophy professor. Lol. When I saw JD statistics saying half of graduates on average get jobs, that sounded amazing at first.
I was going to be an English professor :lol:

20170322

Gold
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:57 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by 20170322 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:26 pm

.
Last edited by 20170322 on Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


burtsbees

New
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by burtsbees » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:27 pm

nouseforaname123 wrote:
burtsbees wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?

I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.
That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.

burtsbees

New
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by burtsbees » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:30 pm

SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,


"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."

Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.

User avatar
Otunga

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Otunga » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:36 pm

burtsbees wrote:
SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,


"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."

Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.
It's reasonable to call it misogyny. I thought it was funny, though. Cleveland could feel equally as outed.

NYC-WVU

Bronze
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by NYC-WVU » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:37 pm

jimbeam21 wrote:
emitremmus wrote:
baloneydanza wrote:I guess the moral of the story is that capitalism has failed us
Amen.
I guess we should all move to France. Or Cleveland.
France! No shit. That new "no work email outside of 9am-6pm" law is golden.* I don't understand why America essentially has only three employment options:
1. Career path with reasonable hours, low(ish) pay that requires no education or specific talent at entry level.
2. Career path with horrible hours, but high pay that requires significant education or talent from the beginning.
3. Career path with horrible hours and low pay, with or without education/talent.

Why can't I be over-educated, work reasonable hours and max out in the low 100k range.

*Damnit! I just went to find a link for this, only to find out the media got it all wrong. No such law was passed in France. So . . . about Cleveland.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
TheSpanishMain

Gold
Posts: 4744
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by TheSpanishMain » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:39 pm

burtsbees wrote:
That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
I think you're misunderstanding the consensus among grads though. No one is saying "No one should go." When someone says "Ugh, 0L's are really resistant to being told not to go" that doesn't mean that EVERY 0L should be told not to go. The ones who get told "don't go" are usually the really delusional ones who think that taking on six figures of debt at a TTT is a good idea and won't retake the LSAT because they "don't test well."

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:41 pm

burtsbees wrote:
SweetTort wrote:Favorite part of the OP,


"What about any other crappy corporate job? If you're happy with a 9-5 that pays $60k, AN AVERAGE LOOKING WIFE, and a 4 bedroom house in the suburbs of Cleveland, you wouldn't be applying to law school."

Blatant sexism/misogyny/idiocy is blatant.
Oh please. It was hyperbole to emphasize a point. Get over yourself.
It was stupid hyperbole that pointlessly alienates a chunk of your audience. But go ahead with your straw man rant.

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Johann » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:41 pm

Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.

User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by ManoftheHour » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:46 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
If you are bald and flabby, and have a shitty personality and are a shitty person, no one will love you period.

My pretty attractive friend is doing her last year of residency at UCI med. Her fiance is an "artist" but he's a great person to be around. It's not the 70s anymore. Women can be and are often the breadwinners.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


rad lulz

Platinum
Posts: 9807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by rad lulz » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:48 pm

TelegramSam wrote:The ontopics are such a cesspool. I don't even know why people like Rayiner and Rad lulz et al still try
Aint nothin but sumthinta do

nouseforaname123

Bronze
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by nouseforaname123 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:48 pm

burtsbees wrote:
nouseforaname123 wrote:
burtsbees wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote: paralegal - you can pick 9-5 or 60k, but you can't have both.
trade stuff - huge flame. very dependent on how much construction is going on in your city and takes a huge toll on your body. Also you need a degree of natural ability. Usually pretty difficult to get your union card.
HR - okay maybe. but HR ugh
office manger - okay this is a good job, but it takes years and some luck to get here.
Exactly. This is my point. If you're satisfied with an average, boring job, then ok, don't go to law school. But no practicing attorney on this board was satisfied with an average, boring job. These people shouldn't be complaining about how dull or tough working in a law firm is, like the poor bloke in the link from "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
Who told you that you would find excitement and meaning in a legal career?

I worked in an average, boring corporate job for a F100 for 5+ years before law school (even had a 4 BR house!). I don't know what to tell you if you're under the impression that law is exciting or materially different from average, boring corporate jobs as far as boredom goes. Law can be different from your average, boring corporate job, in some ways better (money and social prestige) , in other ways worse (hours, personal sacrifice, significant stress, way it changes the vast majority of people). However, you're likely going to end up disappointed if you're expecting to find significant meaning and excitement in a legal career while making a lot of money as a practicing lawyer.
That's my point. All jobs where you're getting paid well (lawyer, i-banker, doctor, engineer, etc), have the same sort of challenges in that you'll be stressed and have to make personal sacrifices. It's not unique to being a lawyer. People need to realize that you're going to have to make personal sacrifices and work shitty hours in order to get anywhere in the world- whether you're in the field of law, finance, medicine, etc. Practicing lawyers in these threads who tell 0Ls to go into engineering and such don't properly account for this. Hence, there should be much less fear-mongering like that in "The fundamental problem with 0L's" thread.
I'm not sure if you're missing the thrust of my post or I failed to properly communicate, so let's try again.

1. Law is not exceptional in terms of excitement--especially if your goal is to make lots of money as a lawyer. ITT, you seem to be emphasizing a legal career as a refuge from "average, boring jobs."

2. You're correct that most (all) fields require personal sacrifice and stress to achieve economic success. Nobody debates that. The other thread that inspired this thread also discussed other factors that 0Ls don't typically account for when deciding to attend law school. Not all stress and personal sacrifice is the same.

User avatar
worldtraveler

Platinum
Posts: 8676
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by worldtraveler » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:49 pm

This thread is apparently only about how men should be lawyers because it's the only way to attract a hot wife with your shit personality.

burtsbees

New
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:23 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by burtsbees » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:49 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
I can see why you're bitter. I'd be too if I were bald and flabby.

The point is, if you're a bald, flabby, shitty lawyer with a golddigger wife, you'd probably be a bald, flabby, shitty doctor with a golddigger wife too, had you chosen that route. Or a bald, flabby, shitty...you get the point.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
aboutmydaylight

Silver
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by aboutmydaylight » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:50 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd. Maybe when you are 50 and partner you will find a golddigger who spends all your money and cheats on you.
You seem to have a grasp on how shitty the work and hours will be, but thinking your life will be better because of these sacrifices is flawed. It will not. The shittiness of your work will pollute everything decent in your life for many years.
Sounds like the American dream.

Theopliske8711

Gold
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:21 am

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Theopliske8711 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:51 pm

Lovely 0L confirmation bias stroking here.

User avatar
Kikero

Silver
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by Kikero » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:51 pm

JohannDeMann wrote:Please show me the beautiful women who will love your bald, flabby, $0 net worth, date breaking, no vacation having, nothing cool to talk about / relate to, unoriginal self who followed the herd.
Mail order brides, bro. There are plenty of hot chicks that'll be happy to marry you for a chance to live in God's great country of 'Murica.

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers

Post by anyriotgirl » Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:51 pm

the fundamental problem with burtsbees is that he keeps on changing his position depending on who/what he is responding to

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”