Loll killed it with SAs, but I don't understand why so many top people dont want to clerktwenty wrote:Well done, Columbia. Well done.
Oh ya lol cause everyone hates litigation and wants to do deals
Loll killed it with SAs, but I don't understand why so many top people dont want to clerktwenty wrote:Well done, Columbia. Well done.
This is a very helpful spreadsheet I've seen in other threads.xmking07 wrote:Here is a link to a spreadsheet with new biglaw numbers/percentages and the % change from last year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
It's a 9 person swing. Clerkship numbers are the epitome of small sample size.ohpobrecito wrote:That's quite the dip for Duke's clerkship numbers.
NLJ250 numbers are worthless now that we have the much more accurate ABA data.Hitchensian wrote:This is a very helpful spreadsheet I've seen in other threads.xmking07 wrote:Here is a link to a spreadsheet with new biglaw numbers/percentages and the % change from last year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
However, just a word of caution to those who may not realize, this sheet uses NLJ 250 placement as its definition of BigLaw, whereas some define BigLaw as any firm with 100+ attorneys (e.g. the original post in this thread) regardless of whether it's included in the NLJ 250. They are nearly the exact same thing, but differ slightly because there are more than 250 firms with 100+ attorneys. And if I'm wrong on this last part someone please correct me.
Also because not every NLJ 250 reports correctly, so ABA data is the way to go.Nelson wrote:NLJ250 numbers are worthless now that we have the much more accurate ABA data.Hitchensian wrote:This is a very helpful spreadsheet I've seen in other threads.xmking07 wrote:Here is a link to a spreadsheet with new biglaw numbers/percentages and the % change from last year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
However, just a word of caution to those who may not realize, this sheet uses NLJ 250 placement as its definition of BigLaw, whereas some define BigLaw as any firm with 100+ attorneys (e.g. the original post in this thread) regardless of whether it's included in the NLJ 250. They are nearly the exact same thing, but differ slightly because there are more than 250 firms with 100+ attorneys. And if I'm wrong on this last part someone please correct me.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I didn't know that NLJ data had a bad rep...good to know though. And yeah, I suppose ABA official numbers would be a more reliable measure.scottidsntknow wrote:Also because not every NLJ 250 reports correctly, so ABA data is the way to go.Nelson wrote:NLJ250 numbers are worthless now that we have the much more accurate ABA data.Hitchensian wrote:This is a very helpful spreadsheet I've seen in other threads.xmking07 wrote:Here is a link to a spreadsheet with new biglaw numbers/percentages and the % change from last year:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... ring#gid=0
However, just a word of caution to those who may not realize, this sheet uses NLJ 250 placement as its definition of BigLaw, whereas some define BigLaw as any firm with 100+ attorneys (e.g. the original post in this thread) regardless of whether it's included in the NLJ 250. They are nearly the exact same thing, but differ slightly because there are more than 250 firms with 100+ attorneys. And if I'm wrong on this last part someone please correct me.
This guy gets it.MyNameIsFlynn! wrote:Northwestern: 55.6 + 7.7 = 63.3%
almost 50% at 500+Tiago Splitter wrote:This guy gets it.MyNameIsFlynn! wrote:Northwestern: 55.6 + 7.7 = 63.3%
Good point... as usual.Nelson wrote:It's a 9 person swing. Clerkship numbers are the epitome of small sample size.ohpobrecito wrote:That's quite the dip for Duke's clerkship numbers.
They used the numbers for class of 2012. Although TBH I don't know if their "at graduation" rates were for 2012 or 2013.whereskyle wrote:Did USNWR use these numbers for its rankings, or last year's?
@grad are 2012 too.Tiago Splitter wrote:They used the numbers for class of 2012. Although TBH I don't know if their "at graduation" rates were for 2012 or 2013.whereskyle wrote:Did USNWR use these numbers for its rankings, or last year's?
And worth repeating: NLJ250 numbers don't even include every firm in the NLJ 250.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Thank you. Makes me feel good to read this.john7234797 wrote:And to think it was only what like 3 years ago every school was claiming 99 % employment with a $115 K average salary. God bless LST.
Here is the ABA sheet.john7234797 wrote:https://www.law.upenn.edu/careers/emplo ... istics.php
I don't know enough about clerkships to distinguish the federal from the state/local ones..
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Golden.ohpobrecito wrote:Here is the ABA sheet.john7234797 wrote:https://www.law.upenn.edu/careers/emplo ... istics.php
I don't know enough about clerkships to distinguish the federal from the state/local ones..
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/30 ... tisticspdf
59.8% + 9.3% = 69.1%
Cotiger, correct me if I'm wrong
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Dat Philadelphia market contraction...ohpobrecito wrote:Here is the ABA sheet.john7234797 wrote:https://www.law.upenn.edu/careers/emplo ... istics.php
I don't know enough about clerkships to distinguish the federal from the state/local ones..
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/30 ... tisticspdf
59.8% + 9.3% = 69.1%
Cotiger, correct me if I'm wrong
Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Worth noting that it's very likely that 40% of the public service placement (Gov't or PI) came from school-funded positions.kaiser wrote:Just came across these numbers as well, and came up with the same percentages. Unsurprising that NYU also had higher % of public interest placement than any of the other top schools aside from Yale.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login