C/O 2016 Class Profiles Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by Lavitz » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:55 am

bouleversement wrote:
Ti Malice wrote:Exactly. Harvard wasn't Hoovering up 3.6x/175+ applicants for nothing. They'll hold their 173.
If only there were an infinite supply of 173+ applicants...
There were more than enough 173 applicants for them to maintain that median. I believe they may have even retained the luxury of rejecting a few. :wink:

In fact, according to this post, the median LSAT for all applicants reporting acceptances at Harvard on LSN actually went up one from last cycle. There's just no way they went down to 172.

User avatar
MyNameIsFlynn!

Silver
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:29 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by MyNameIsFlynn! » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:32 am

UGA: 163 (-1) 3.69 (+.02), 201 students (+12)

UGA's class is mostly in staters who get dirt cheap tuition (17k), so me thinks them losing a point doesn't bode well for others T1s with 45k+ tuition
Last edited by MyNameIsFlynn! on Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:47 am, edited 3 times in total.

zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by zman » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:46 am

http://www.law.ucla.edu/prospective-stu ... ofile.aspx

UCLA median down to 167. I think they gave up at the last second and just admitted a bunch of people of the waitlist for revenue reasons, they could have had a 168 if they kept the class to about 280.
Last edited by zman on Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
t-14orbust

Gold
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by t-14orbust » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:47 am

zman wrote:http://www.law.ucla.edu/prospective-stu ... ofile.aspx

UCLA median down to 167. I think they gave up at the last second just and admitted a bunch of people of the waitlist for revenue reasons, they could have had a 168 if they kept the class to about 280.
Now I'm really interested in seeing how USC fared

User avatar
DrStudMuffin

Bronze
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by DrStudMuffin » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:55 am

.
Last edited by DrStudMuffin on Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by zman » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:08 pm

I think UCLA lost a ton of OOS applicants but still have the entire UC system. I would think a school like Vanderbilt that doesn't have a local feeder would get hit hard.

zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by zman » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:13 pm

t-14orbust wrote:
zman wrote:http://www.law.ucla.edu/prospective-stu ... ofile.aspx

UCLA median down to 167. I think they gave up at the last second just and admitted a bunch of people of the waitlist for revenue reasons, they could have had a 168 if they kept the class to about 280.
Now I'm really interested in seeing how USC fared
They admitted a couple of 166s of the waitlist late according to LSN so it's probably down from 167 to 166.

arklaw13

Gold
Posts: 1862
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by arklaw13 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:13 pm

zman wrote:I think UCLA lost a ton of OOS applicants but still have the entire UC system. I would think a school like Vanderbilt that doesn't have a local feeder would get hit hard.
Vandy's median went from 169 --> 167. Can't remember GPA median. I noticed quite a lot of low lsat wait list admits.

04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by 04102014 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:44 pm

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
t-14orbust

Gold
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by t-14orbust » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:44 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:UVA Dropped to 169.

http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2 ... f_2016.htm
holy shit it's a massacre

User avatar
MyNameIsFlynn!

Silver
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:29 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by MyNameIsFlynn! » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:53 pm

t-14orbust wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:UVA Dropped to 169.

http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2 ... f_2016.htm
holy shit it's a massacre
I lol'd :lol:

User avatar
hohenheim

Bronze
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by hohenheim » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:57 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:UVA Dropped to 169.

http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2 ... f_2016.htm

They dropped class size too, lower than the previous 9 years (last year was lower than the previous 8 )

358 --> 336

User avatar
shaynislegend

Bronze
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:40 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by shaynislegend » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:19 pm

So far it looks like Duke has been the only school to see an increase in apps?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jingosaur

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by jingosaur » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:23 pm

shaynislegend wrote:So far it looks like Duke has been the only school to see an increase in apps?
Duke says that it's one of 7 schools to have an increase in apps. I'm sure most of the other schools are state flagships, but who knows.

User avatar
shifty_eyed

Gold
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by shifty_eyed » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:27 pm

shaynislegend wrote:So far it looks like Duke has been the only school to see an increase in apps?
Priority Review was a great idea for them. I wasn't 100% set on applying until I got it.

User avatar
shaynislegend

Bronze
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:40 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by shaynislegend » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:28 pm

jingosaur wrote:
shaynislegend wrote:So far it looks like Duke has been the only school to see an increase in apps?
Duke says that it's one of 7 schools to have an increase in apps. I'm sure most of the other schools are state flagships, but who knows.
My guess would be that Alabama is one of those 7.

Paul Campos

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by Paul Campos » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:29 pm

Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


jk148706

Gold
Posts: 2502
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by jk148706 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:29 pm

Paul Campos wrote:Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104
Holy

User avatar
justonemoregame

Silver
Posts: 1156
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by justonemoregame » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:31 pm

lolCase Western has 104 students (-37%). Anyone remember Dean Lawrence Mitchell?

http://abovethelaw.com/2012/11/students ... aw-school/

(scooped)

hephaestus

Gold
Posts: 2399
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by hephaestus » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:32 pm

Paul Campos wrote:Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104
What do you think comes next? They can't sustain their faculty etc at this rate.

User avatar
shaynislegend

Bronze
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:40 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by shaynislegend » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:32 pm

Paul Campos wrote:Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104
Wow. I figured it would be rough when I received "invitation to apply for scholarship this fall" in like July.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by 09042014 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:33 pm

ImNoScar wrote:
Paul Campos wrote:Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104
What do you think comes next? They can't sustain their faculty etc at this rate.
Do they have a large faculty or do they rely on adjuncts in large part?

User avatar
jackattack17

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by jackattack17 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:38 pm

Case announced a "revamping their curriculum" today: http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/ ... /130829975. Interesting about making kids take leadership classes at the business school.

User avatar
KevinP

Silver
Posts: 1322
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by KevinP » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:45 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:UVA Dropped to 169.

http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2 ... f_2016.htm

Is ED UVA still TCR now that they have a TTT LSAT?

Paul Campos

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am

Re: C/O 2016 Class Profiles

Post by Paul Campos » Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:47 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
ImNoScar wrote:
Paul Campos wrote:Case Western 1L class size:

2010: 236
2011: 194
2012: 154
2013: 104
What do you think comes next? They can't sustain their faculty etc at this rate.
Do they have a large faculty or do they rely on adjuncts in large part?

They have an 11.7 to 1 student-faculty ratio, which is somewhat lower than the average of around 14 to 1. They've already announced cuts in staff and adjuncts, but of course that's not where the big money is. I don't know their precise tenure rules, but at most universities you can't lay off tenured or even tenure-track faculty without declaring a financial emergency, which naturally is a last resort, since doing so risks creating a death spiral of bad publicity. But if their class is down by more than 50% they may soon have no other choice.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”