2014 Rankings Released Forum
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
According to last years rankings, the following data is recorded for employed at graduation: (.04 of the methodology)
upper T1 schools: (went through rank #51 cuz arbitrary cutoffs are arbitrary)
CU- 57%
UF- 51%
Wake-52%
UNC- 51%
Hastings- 40%
Pepperdine- 51%
SMU 59%
Baylor 50%
Tulane 42%
compared to other upper T1 schools: (included Arizona St and UW cuz they really are upper T1 schools)
American 69%
Utah 75%
Maryland 83%
Mason 90%
UGA 83%
Davis 83%
Arizona St. 83% (98% overall, lol)
OSU 83%
UW 88%
FSU 75%
I call bullshit a thousand times over. No way 83% of UGA grads, 90% of Mason grads, or 88% of UW grads are walking out of law school with a real job offer in this environment. Clearly the second group is shamelessly gaming the rankings in a way the first group either refuses to or hasn't figured out how to do. Just look at peer schools in the same state. FSU at 75% but UF at 51%? Hastings at 40% but Davis at 83%? Fuck off. This should be talked about a lot more on this board. 4% of the ranking methodology is nuthing to sneeze at, and schools that may actually be telling the truth-- baylor, tulane, are getting shit on by the arizona states of the world.
Anyone know how they exactly come up with the employed at graduation reports? Srry this was a rushed shitty post btw, not a lot of time.
upper T1 schools: (went through rank #51 cuz arbitrary cutoffs are arbitrary)
CU- 57%
UF- 51%
Wake-52%
UNC- 51%
Hastings- 40%
Pepperdine- 51%
SMU 59%
Baylor 50%
Tulane 42%
compared to other upper T1 schools: (included Arizona St and UW cuz they really are upper T1 schools)
American 69%
Utah 75%
Maryland 83%
Mason 90%
UGA 83%
Davis 83%
Arizona St. 83% (98% overall, lol)
OSU 83%
UW 88%
FSU 75%
I call bullshit a thousand times over. No way 83% of UGA grads, 90% of Mason grads, or 88% of UW grads are walking out of law school with a real job offer in this environment. Clearly the second group is shamelessly gaming the rankings in a way the first group either refuses to or hasn't figured out how to do. Just look at peer schools in the same state. FSU at 75% but UF at 51%? Hastings at 40% but Davis at 83%? Fuck off. This should be talked about a lot more on this board. 4% of the ranking methodology is nuthing to sneeze at, and schools that may actually be telling the truth-- baylor, tulane, are getting shit on by the arizona states of the world.
Anyone know how they exactly come up with the employed at graduation reports? Srry this was a rushed shitty post btw, not a lot of time.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Mason at 90%? SERIOUSLY? I swear I'm becoming more and more convinced that non-T14 law schools are nothing more than glorified scam artists...Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:According to last years rankings, the following data is recorded for employed at graduation: (.04 of the methodology)
upper T1 schools: (went through rank #51 cuz arbitrary cutoffs are arbitrary)
CU- 57%
UF- 51%
Wake-52%
UNC- 51%
Hastings- 40%
Pepperdine- 51%
SMU 59%
Baylor 50%
Tulane 42%
compared to other upper T1 schools: (included Arizona St and UW cuz they really are upper T1 schools)
American 69%
Utah 75%
Maryland 83%
Mason 90%
UGA 83%
Davis 83%
Arizona St. 83% (98% overall, lol)
OSU 83%
UW 88%
FSU 75%
I call bullshit a thousand times over. No way 83% of UGA grads, 90% of Mason grads, or 88% of UW grads are walking out of law school with a real job offer in this environment. Clearly the second group is shamelessly gaming the rankings in a way the first group either refuses to or hasn't figured out how to do. Just look at peer schools in the same state. FSU at 75% but UF at 51%? Hastings at 40% but Davis at 83%? Fuck off. This should be talked about a lot more on this board. 4% of the ranking methodology is nuthing to sneeze at, and schools that may actually be telling the truth-- baylor, tulane, are getting shit on by the arizona states of the world.
Anyone know how they exactly come up with the employed at graduation reports? Srry this was a rushed shitty post btw, not a lot of time.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:51 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Ican'twaitforthesetocomeoutI'msoexcited!
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
IIRC the gap last year in score between NYU and PVB (92 vs. 87) was greater than the gap between S and NYU (96 vs. 92). There was a 1 point gap between each spot from S to N.
So... Y/S/CLS?
So... Y/S/CLS?

-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
But no one knows how career service office's calculate employed at graduation? Also that metric is so lacking on its face.. where I want to work after law school doesn't hire until after bar passage.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
They've been posted a couple times in random threads: http://i.imgur.com/58ayG.pngRegulus wrote:Where can you find the raw scores that you're referring to?Crowing wrote:IIRC the gap last year in score between NYU and PVB (92 vs. 87) was greater than the gap between S and NYU (96 vs. 92). There was a 1 point gap between each spot from S to N.
So... Y/S/CLS?
eta: As much as I claim I don't care about USNWR, I could probably reproduce that chart by memory. It's sad.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Fucking lol'd at the last column.banjo wrote:They've been posted a couple times in random threads: http://i.imgur.com/58ayG.pngRegulus wrote:Where can you find the raw scores that you're referring to?Crowing wrote:IIRC the gap last year in score between NYU and PVB (92 vs. 87) was greater than the gap between S and NYU (96 vs. 92). There was a 1 point gap between each spot from S to N.
So... Y/S/CLS?
eta: As much as I claim I don't care about USNWR, I could probably reproduce that chart by memory. It's sad.
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
ASU employment % going up to 99%! Just you wait 

- jrsbaseball5
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Jumping in here for the waiting game
-
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
That droves meme is getting old.
Also, employers do pay attention to rankings. Not the small moves that happen year to year but multi-year trends for sure.
Also, employers do pay attention to rankings. Not the small moves that happen year to year but multi-year trends for sure.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
It will bother me if UVA (17% school funded) is ranked ahead of Michigan (3% school funded) again.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Is that what they told you at your SA?shoeshine wrote:That droves meme is getting old.
Also, employers do pay attention to rankings. Not the small moves that happen year to year but multi-year trends for sure.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Aren't those stats for the michigan class who was told to bid heavily on Chicago, even though we now know that's a crazy strategy? I'm willing to bet that, excluding school-funded jobs, the c/o 2012 michigan job stats will outperform UVA.Regulus wrote:But if you look at the numbers I posted above, even if you subtracted the 17% from UVA and the 3% from Michigan, UVA is still ahead of Michigan when it comes to employment rates (84.14% versus 83.61%).ohpobrecito wrote:It will bother me if UVA (17% school funded) is ranked ahead of Michigan (3% school funded) again.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
If my school drops 1 place, I will drop out.
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:35 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
This is actually a really interesting point. This is a place where USN could really massage the data. A few ways come to mind, including selecting who gets the surveys based on school, tracking how/whether particular individuals respond, etc. I'm sure these are supposed to be anonymous... Is the US News' data collection or calculation process audited?Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:most fascinating part of the methodology is the peer review and lawyers and judges score. wtf. first of all, who decides who gets these surveys? second, how the fuck do you rate schools based on 1 to 5? at least make it 1 to 10 and allow for half scores. ridiculous. this score counts for like 40% of the rankings, and there is no way to even reform it and make it less than horse-shit.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Tom Joad wrote:If my school drops 1 place, I will drop out.

You'd better. I'm waiting for the rankings to come out before I commit to a school...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:49 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
+1Tom Joad wrote:If my school drops 1 place, I will drop out.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
So the idea is to just apply to every school you can and go to the highest ranked school right?
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
That's the idea. Even though I'm from Cali and want to work in LA, I'd choose Vandy over USC because 16th is better than 18th.wannabelawstudent wrote:So the idea is to just apply to every school you can and go to the highest ranked school right?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
FTFYwannabelawstudent wrote:So the idea is to justapply to every school you can and go to the highest ranked schoolattend ASU if accepted right?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login