(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
-
PhiAlphaFLBeta

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:49 pm
Post
by PhiAlphaFLBeta » Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:43 pm
chimp wrote:PhiAlphaFLBeta wrote:Only way I can see the rankings being relevant in any way is that we (0Ls) take them so seriously that we'll choose where we apply and enroll based on the USNews ranks. This affects the quality of students that school can recruit, which in theory would improve the quality of the graduates from that school. Long term, rankings could indirectly alter how law firms view schools.
Best advice I ever received was from a retired CT appellate court judge who told me to go where I can get the best legal education for the least amount of money regardless of rank.
That's actually pretty misleading/shitty advice.
Why? He was telling me to avoid spending 150k on a TT private school when I can spend 60k and get a good legal education from a TTT state school. Seems like good advice to me.
-
Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Post
by Dany » Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:45 pm
Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
-
071816

- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Post
by 071816 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:48 pm
Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This.
-
JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Post
by JoeMo » Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:15 pm
chimp wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This.
pretty much. This reminds me of that LSN profile where someone turned down Yale to go to Phoenix with $$$. Laughable.
-
20160810

- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Post
by 20160810 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:21 pm
JoeMo wrote:chimp wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This.
pretty much. This reminds me of that LSN profile where someone turned down Yale to go to Phoenix with $$$. Laughable.
This sounds like pure, uncut trolling to me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
PhiAlphaFLBeta

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:49 pm
Post
by PhiAlphaFLBeta » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:11 pm
After the T15, career prospects are mostly regional, so why spend 150k for a private school like Tulane when you can go to LSU for less than half the price. That's what I took from his advice.
-
Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Post
by Tiago Splitter » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:13 pm
PhiAlphaFLBeta wrote:After the T15, career prospects are mostly regional, so why spend 150k for a private school like Tulane when you can go to LSU for less than half the price. That's what I took from his advice.
This is good advice. This is not what you said before.
-
prezidentv8

- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Post
by prezidentv8 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:45 pm
Br3v wrote:Welcome to applying to law school where the employment prospects are made up and the rankings don't matter.

Well that got some laughs from the Prez.

-
Pleasye

- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm
Post
by Pleasye » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:52 pm
prezidentv8 wrote:Br3v wrote:Welcome to applying to law school where the employment prospects are made up and the rankings don't matter.

Well that got some laughs from the Prez.

Yeah I lol'd too.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
Guchster

- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:38 pm
Post
by Guchster » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:54 pm
prezidentv8 wrote:
Well that got some laughs from the Prez.

Third person post?
-
PhiAlphaFLBeta

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:49 pm
Post
by PhiAlphaFLBeta » Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:57 pm
Tiago Splitter wrote:PhiAlphaFLBeta wrote:After the T15, career prospects are mostly regional, so why spend 150k for a private school like Tulane when you can go to LSU for less than half the price. That's what I took from his advice.
This is good advice. This is not what you said before.
It's what I meant the first time, guess I didn't express it very well.
-
spleenworship

- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Post
by spleenworship » Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:15 pm
Pleasye wrote:prezidentv8 wrote:Br3v wrote:Welcome to applying to law school where the employment prospects are made up and the rankings don't matter.

Well that got some laughs from the Prez.

Yeah I lol'd too.
-
Renne Walker

- Posts: 545
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:12 am
Post
by Renne Walker » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:11 am
If law school rankings didn’t matter, we’d all be living at home or in a vacation resort attending the area’s cheapest school.
I agree with posters claiming that we are taught the same thing in class. Over spring break a friend played an online recording from one of her classes, there wasn’t any difference to what we were imparted. Perhaps the day will come when we will all take identical classes on-line, get our grade, pass the bar and then fend for ourselves without being helped or worsened by law school rankings. But until then. . .
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
20160810

- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Post
by 20160810 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:41 am
Renne Walker wrote:If law school rankings didn’t matter, we’d all be living at home or in a vacation resort attending the area’s cheapest school.
I agree with posters claiming that we are taught the same thing in class. Over spring break a friend played an online recording from one of her classes, there wasn’t any difference to what we were imparted. Perhaps the day will come when we will all take identical classes on-line, get our grade, pass the bar and then fend for ourselves without being helped or worsened by law school rankings. But until then. . .
You're right, everyone should apply to ASU in DROVES
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Post
by rad lulz » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:45 am
.
Last edited by
rad lulz on Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Guchster

- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:38 pm
Post
by Guchster » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:51 am
Renne Walker wrote:If law school rankings didn’t matter, we’d all be living at home or in a vacation resort attending the area’s cheapest school.
USNWR are the only rankings that exist objectively or subjectively, AMIRITE?
-
20160810

- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Post
by 20160810 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:55 am
Guchster wrote:Renne Walker wrote:If law school rankings didn’t matter, we’d all be living at home or in a vacation resort attending the area’s cheapest school.
USNWR are the only rankings that exist objectively or subjectively, AMIRITE?
Drop out now. ED to ASU.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Bless

- Posts: 532
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:32 am
Post
by Bless » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:13 pm
Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you won't learn anything in law school.
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:17 pm
Bless wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you didn't learn anything in law school.
She's exaggerating a little (you do learn
some stuff in law school), but most learning is done on the job, not in the classroom.
And she is definitely right that "best legal education" is stupid and it would be foolish for anyone to choose a school based on perceived differences in educational quality. Law schools are almost perfect carbon copies of one another. I am learning the same thing at my school as the rest of TLS is learning at theirs. To what extent there are differences in education, they are negligible compared to job prospects, and job prospects should be the top concern on everyone's mind, followed closely by debt.
-
Bless

- Posts: 532
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:32 am
Post
by Bless » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:23 pm
I agree that choosing a law school for the "best legal education" is retarded. Any difference, from the best to the worst, is so unexplainably minuscule and will have no effect in practice.
However, I do think (know) you learn a lot in law school.
-
Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Post
by Dany » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:35 pm
Bless wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you won't learn anything in law school.
lol
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
chup

- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Post
by chup » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:35 pm
Guchster wrote:Renne Walker wrote:If law school rankings didn’t matter, we’d all be living at home or in a vacation resort attending the area’s cheapest school.
USNWR are the only rankings that exist objectively or subjectively, AMIRITE?
A CHALLENGER APPEARS.
-
chup

- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Post
by chup » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:36 pm
Bless wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you won't learn anything in law school.
I don't think you know the definition of "fathom."
-
FeelTheHeat

- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am
Post
by FeelTheHeat » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:43 pm
aschup wrote:Bless wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you won't learn anything in law school.
I don't think you know the definition of "fathom."
http://youtu.be/D58LpHBnvsI
-
Guchster

- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:38 pm
Post
by Guchster » Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:01 pm
Dany wrote:Bless wrote:Dany wrote:Because "best legal education" is stupid. You don't learn anything in law school. You need to go where there are the best job prospects.
This is true. When you're as smart as Dany Boy and you universally knew the way the law worked in all fields before law school orientation was even fathomed, which of course we all did, you won't learn anything in law school.
lol
wat is a "dany boy"?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login