For a V5 job? You sure about that DeserTTT Fox?Desert Fox wrote:Yea you don't need top 30% even at TTTs like NorthwesTTTern.Kronk wrote:If you go to Berkeley and want a V5 job, make sure you're sociable and get good grades (like, all Hs, which is only the equivalent of top 20-30% of the class). Is it different anywhere else with the exception of Harvard and Yale?
Berkeley vs. Columbia* Forum
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
FTFYKronk wrote:If you go to Berkeley and want aV5biglaw job, make sure you're sociable and get good grades (like, all Hs, which is only the equivalent of top 20-30% of the class). Is it different anywhere else with the exception of Harvard and Yale?
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Anecdotal, but I know lots of people that have BigLaw jobs in the V50 with plenty of P's that probably make their de facto class rank around the median. Although the 2Ls would say the job search is a lot harder than I give it credit for.Veyron wrote:FTFYKronk wrote:If you go to Berkeley and want aV5biglaw job, make sure you're sociable and get good grades (like, all Hs, which is only the equivalent of top 20-30% of the class). Is it different anywhere else with the exception of Harvard and Yale?
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
ooops I misread V5 to be v100.Kronk wrote:For a V5 job? You sure about that DeserTTT Fox?Desert Fox wrote:Yea you don't need top 30% even at TTTs like NorthwesTTTern.Kronk wrote:If you go to Berkeley and want a V5 job, make sure you're sociable and get good grades (like, all Hs, which is only the equivalent of top 20-30% of the class). Is it different anywhere else with the exception of Harvard and Yale?
Thats why I go to NorthwesTTTern. For NU its like 15%
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
The only V I give a shit about is the V160.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
+1.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
- megaTTTron
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I know of at least one TLSer who is consciously disregarding that realization.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I just want someone to spend thanksgiving doing doc review and then think back to all those "160 OR BUST, MOTHERFUCKERS" posts and lolDCLaw11 wrote:+1.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I always say this, and most people don't care. I met big law associates who complain that they can't afford to rent an apartment close to the firm they work at, and they laugh at the word "weekend".Kronk wrote:Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I will need to escape soul crushing debt somehow... 

- megaTTTron
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
the true CR.bk187 wrote:I will need to escape soul crushing debt somehow...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
By not borrowing it?bk187 wrote:I will need to escape soul crushing debt somehow...
Or LRAP?
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
First one really isn't an option for me (supersplitter).r6_philly wrote:By not borrowing it?
Or LRAP?
Second one doesn't affect what school I will choose as a school's prestige will help when it comes to both biglaw and PI.
- BruceWayne
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
It should when the school's reputations are close. Boalt's LRAP>>UVA and Penn. Columbia's LRAP>>>>>>Chicago's.bk187 wrote:First one really isn't an option for me (supersplitter).r6_philly wrote:By not borrowing it?
Or LRAP?
Second one doesn't affect what school I will choose as a school's prestige will help when it comes to both biglaw and PI.
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
This is relevant to my interests.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Agreed fully, though I don't know if I have that much room to talk since I'll be at a firm in SF where the COL is almost as bad as NYC, but at least I won't be billing 2,400 hours a year.Kronk wrote:Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
I've always fucking worked 80 hours a week and weekends. As a 1L I've clocked between 90 and 120 hours of class + studying pretty consistently for the past 2 months. You really fucking think that I'm going to complain about doing less work and getting paid 160k (if I'm that fortunate, G-d willing), you are out of your fucking mind.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
OK, in your case, maybe biglaw is the right call. (Insert f-words here).Veyron wrote:I've always fucking worked 80 hours a week and weekends. As a 1L I've clocked between 90 and 120 hours of class + studying pretty consistently for the past 2 months. You really fucking think that I'm going to complain about doing less work and getting paid 160k (if I'm that fortunate, G-d willing), you are out of your fucking mind.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:03 am
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Government jobs are hiring? I think you're a confused 1L.Kronk wrote:Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
Your hours depend on your practice group. If you do M&A work, sure, it's going to be unpredictable and long. But other transactional groups have steadier hours. Also, if you work biglaw in ANY city, you're going to be working similar hours.
A lot of midlaw firms will work you at similar hours but pay you less. A lot of PI jobs require long hours for a fraction of the pay.
Also NY averages between 2000-2100 billable hours, more so the first. I don't know where you people got the idea that they are required to bill 2400+ hours. Not every NY firm is like Cravath.
If you want good hours and biglaw, look at Texas, not California.
Last edited by irishman86 on Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Read the employment board. There are several posters that do NYC biglaw and will confirm that the hours are worse at almost every firm than biglaw in other cities (except maybe DC). Sure, biglaw's no picnic anywhere, but if you think you're making a career at the firm billing 2000-2100 hours in NYC, you're stoned.irishman86 wrote:Government jobs are hiring? I think you're a confused 1L.Kronk wrote:Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
Your hours depend on your practice group. If you do M&A work, sure, it's going to be unpredictable and long. But other transactional groups have steadier hours. Also, if you work biglaw in ANY city, you're going to be working similar hours.
A lot of midlaw firms will work you at similar hours but pay you less. A lot of PI jobs require long hours for a fraction of the pay.
Also NY averages between 2000-2100 billable hours, more so the first. I don't know where you people got the idea that they are required to bill 2400+ hours. Not every NY firm is like Cravath.
If you want good hours and biglaw, look at Texas, not California.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
How much time at law school do you spend on your menstrual cycle?Veyron wrote:I've always fucking worked 80 hours a week and weekends. As a 1L I've clocked between 90 and 120 hours of class + studying pretty consistently for the past 2 months. You really fucking think that I'm going to complain about doing less work and getting paid 160k (if I'm that fortunate, G-d willing), you are out of your fucking mind.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley vs. Columbia*
Government jobs are indeed hiring. There obviously aren't a lot of openings, but there are openings. Federal Public Defenders are hiring in my area right now, amongst others. My point isn't ruined even if you replace government with non-profit though. You can start at 70k or so at a lot of non-profits in the Bay Area.irishman86 wrote:Government jobs are hiring? I think you're a confused 1L.Kronk wrote:Yeah, particularly in New York City. 160k in NYC is like a 80k-90k salary elsewhere. In California, you can get 45 hr / wk government jobs that pay that much.SBL wrote:I'm curious what percentage of TLS posters will lose their biglaw hard-ons when they realize (1.) that $160,000 isn't actually that much money and (2.) how much working 80 hours a week actually sucks.
Your hours depend on your practice group. If you do M&A work, sure, it's going to be unpredictable and long. But other transactional groups have steadier hours. Also, if you work biglaw in ANY city, you're going to be working similar hours.
A lot of midlaw firms will work you at similar hours but pay you less. A lot of PI jobs require long hours for a fraction of the pay.
Also NY averages between 2000-2100 billable hours, more so the first. I don't know where you people got the idea that they are required to bill 2400+ hours. Not every NY firm is like Cravath.
If you want good hours and biglaw, look at Texas, not California.
And as for the COL in SF--it expensive for sure, but you can find spots to live cheaper (like the Mission). In New York, if you want anything cheaper you have to leave Manhattan and live in Brooklyn. Which isn't that bad actually, but isn't Manhattan.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login