Law School Rankings: A new perspective Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
BroCHILLOUT

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by BroCHILLOUT » Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:43 pm

IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success

im still laughing from this one!!!! hahahhahaha!!

User avatar
dresden doll

Platinum
Posts: 6797
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by dresden doll » Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:53 pm

BroCHILLOUT wrote:
IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success

im still laughing from this one!!!! hahahhahaha!!
What's laughable is your patent trolling. In the alternative, you're laughable for lacking a brain. I'd be willing to bet on the former, however.

Eric475

New
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Eric475 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:16 pm

Chuch wrote:TLS:
any poster wrote:I FOUND NEW/DIFFERENT RANKINGS!!!
person who's school is ranked below its USNews rank wrote:Yale is not #1 so whatever this is purportedly ranking is stupid and the methodology is flawed. This ranking is stupid and unhelpful.
person who's school is ranked above its USNews rank wrote:I think this actually makes a lot of sense. If you want whatever this ranking is ranking, my school is a smart choice.
person who goes to the one random school that made the top ten wrote:We need to stop focusing exclusively on USNews because rankings like these can be extremely helpful and offer a fresh insight. Its not that my school is better than Columbia but for some things we are as good as or better than Columbia... as indicated by these completely legitimate rankings that we should keep focusing on
every other TLS poster wrote:::takes a moment to recover from mind exploding after exposure to new information that challenges the accepted worldview they have been propagating since joining TLS sometime earlier this year:: This is stupid. If you want NYC biglaw, all the statistics that i've seen say go to NYU or Columbia and maybe Chi which is also good for academia and clerkships. That is of course if you can't get into HYS which is good everywhere. Virginia places well in DC. Penn is good for NY. Columbia places better than NYU in other markets. Texas is a much worse school than Georgetown.
One of the funniest posts Ive ever read

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Bronte » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:02 pm

Eric475 wrote:
Chuch wrote:TLS:
any poster wrote:I FOUND NEW/DIFFERENT RANKINGS!!!
person who's school is ranked below its USNews rank wrote:Yale is not #1 so whatever this is purportedly ranking is stupid and the methodology is flawed. This ranking is stupid and unhelpful.
person who's school is ranked above its USNews rank wrote:I think this actually makes a lot of sense. If you want whatever this ranking is ranking, my school is a smart choice.
person who goes to the one random school that made the top ten wrote:We need to stop focusing exclusively on USNews because rankings like these can be extremely helpful and offer a fresh insight. Its not that my school is better than Columbia but for some things we are as good as or better than Columbia... as indicated by these completely legitimate rankings that we should keep focusing on
every other TLS poster wrote:::takes a moment to recover from mind exploding after exposure to new information that challenges the accepted worldview they have been propagating since joining TLS sometime earlier this year:: This is stupid. If you want NYC biglaw, all the statistics that i've seen say go to NYU or Columbia and maybe Chi which is also good for academia and clerkships. That is of course if you can't get into HYS which is good everywhere. Virginia places well in DC. Penn is good for NY. Columbia places better than NYU in other markets. Texas is a much worse school than Georgetown.
One of the funniest posts Ive ever read
Lol, no.

User avatar
Warhawk

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:57 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Warhawk » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:53 am

BroCHILLOUT wrote:
Warhawk wrote:
BroCHILLOUT wrote:Some of you are just mad that the schools that you all are attending right now are being knocked down and that's ok. Reality hurts.
Lets hope you never run into any reality then.

LOL ... look at this guy ... mr. Illinois dropped from 21 to 40... and booom "no no... these rankings dont make ANY sense." REALITY HURTS buddy...
Your name.

It's ironic. :roll:

Fortunately, I have other things to do on the internet besides desperately seeking validation of my own existence.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Regionality

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Regionality » Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:38 pm

I do think there should be a new focus in rankings, and it should focus exclusively on how good ones job prospects are by going to a school.

This should be represented by national reach, starting salaries, number of prestigious clerkship's received per capita, and overall flexibility/durability/portability of a degree. It's all that matters, really...

Oh, and then there should be a separate list that re-ranks everything based on how much it costs to attend...you put in the cost of attendance to each school, the rank does some fancy re-calculation of the relative strength based on that price, and then it does a personal ranking....

And Yale should always be #1...

And all the rankings should still pretty much be the same as USNWR...though I bet there would be some minute changes.

BroCHILLOUT

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by BroCHILLOUT » Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:23 am

Warhawk wrote:
BroCHILLOUT wrote:
Warhawk wrote:
BroCHILLOUT wrote:Some of you are just mad that the schools that you all are attending right now are being knocked down and that's ok. Reality hurts.
Lets hope you never run into any reality then.

LOL ... look at this guy ... mr. Illinois dropped from 21 to 40... and booom "no no... these rankings dont make ANY sense." REALITY HURTS buddy...
Your name.

It's ironic. :roll:

Fortunately, I have other things to do on the internet besides desperately seeking validation of my own existence.

"Fortunately, I(you) have other things to do"... Yet you are here responding to me laughing @ you....
"besides desperately seeking validation of my own existence."... that's asinine, i did no such thing. If anything its you who are doing it by typing your foolish responses.

User avatar
clintonius

Silver
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by clintonius » Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:38 am

clintonius wrote:Failed flame is failed. It's ok. We understand. No shame in cutting your losses.

BroCHILLOUT

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by BroCHILLOUT » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:40 am

IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


calbears619

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:22 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by calbears619 » Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:29 pm

It never hurts to see law schools ranked by different systems as long as one understands the methodology (and accepts that it will inevitably have flaws). Although I can't really imagine a publication called "Super Lawyers" recognizing the lawyers who forgo the salary and prestige of biglaw in favor of public service.

User avatar
Chuch

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Chuch » Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:32 pm

the most helpful ranking is http://www.lawschool100.com/, imo

User avatar
Warhawk

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:57 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Warhawk » Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:39 pm

Chuch wrote:the most helpful ranking is http://www.lawschool100.com/, imo
Irrespective of whether it's accurate or not, I'm not sure I'd call it "helpful." It's just a list with links to the schools' websites.

OTOH, TLS is actually "helpful."

User avatar
Chuch

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Chuch » Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:46 pm

its an ordered list. that was the most important feature, imo

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Regionality

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Regionality » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:01 pm

Chuch wrote:its an ordered list. that was the most important feature, imo
All ranks are ordered. Otherwise it would be the "USNWR Blob of Law Schools"

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Bronte » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:06 pm

The concept of tiering schools is helpful. The actual schools "Law School 100" puts in those tiers is not helpful.

User avatar
Chuch

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Chuch » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:12 pm

Bronte wrote:The concept of tiering schools is helpful. The actual schools "Law School 100" puts in those tiers is not helpful.
why not?

User avatar
Regionality

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Regionality » Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:31 pm

Chuch wrote:
Bronte wrote:The concept of tiering schools is helpful. The actual schools "Law School 100" puts in those tiers is not helpful.
why not?
Because it suggests that someone who would rather practice law in DC should go to Minnesota instead of William and Mary because they are separated by 2 whole tiers!

Adding such distinctive blocked tiers implies a greater division between the tiers than actually exists.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Bronte » Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:35 pm

Chuch wrote:
Bronte wrote:The concept of tiering schools is helpful. The actual schools "Law School 100" puts in those tiers is not helpful.
why not?
Yale below Harvard? Duke in the same tier as USC? University of Texas in the same tier as Minnesota and WashU? "Qualitative, rather than quantitative, criteria"?

User avatar
Chuch

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Chuch » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:00 pm

So you find the rankings unhelpful because they don't line up exactly with USNews?

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Bronte » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:27 pm

Chuch wrote:So you find the rankings unhelpful because they don't line up exactly with USNews?
No.

User avatar
gdane

Diamond
Posts: 14023
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by gdane » Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:47 pm

IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success
Who the F* is USNWR to define success? At least "Superlawyers" deals with the legal field. USNWR is a TTT magazine that noone really even reads.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
dresden doll

Platinum
Posts: 6797
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by dresden doll » Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:36 pm

gdane5 wrote:
IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success
Who the F* is USNWR to define success? At least "Superlawyers" deals with the legal field. USNWR is a TTT magazine that noone really even reads.
Except that USNWR rankings correlate with employment prospects and deans practically get shitcanned if their school drops in the hierarchy. But, yeah, apart from law schools, applicants and employers, no one cares about USNWR.

User avatar
flyingpanda

Silver
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:32 am

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by flyingpanda » Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:19 pm

dresden doll wrote:
gdane5 wrote:
IAFG wrote:who the fuck is superlawyers to define success
Who the F* is USNWR to define success? At least "Superlawyers" deals with the legal field. USNWR is a TTT magazine that noone really even reads.
Except that USNWR rankings correlate with employment prospects and deans practically get shitcanned if their school drops in the hierarchy. But, yeah, apart from law schools, applicants and employers, no one cares about USNWR.
I approve of any ranking that puts UVA in the top5

User avatar
Chuch

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Chuch » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:58 pm

flyingpanda wrote: I approve of any ranking that puts UVA in the top5
looks like everyone does except USNews...
http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/blo ... y_id=10864

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Law School Rankings: A new perspective

Post by Bronte » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:09 pm

Chuch wrote:
flyingpanda wrote: I approve of any ranking that puts UVA in the top5
looks like everyone does except USNews...
http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/blo ... y_id=10864
What you've linked to is a very flawed methodology, verging on the absurd. To top it off, the data isn't even entered correctly. When was Texas ever 3rd on the NLJ survey?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”