Differently how? I think in the "Husband forbidding it" thread most people were reacting to the fact that children were involved (As well as her characterization of his overbearing attitude). Fair or not, having small children changes thing significantly and in a way that is more burdensome for a mother. If OP had said he had kids or that his wife would have to make career sacrifices, then I would be more inclined to think he needed to make the compromise. From his post, it appears she is flexible on work location and the family issue is just wanting to be near relatives. My husband can work from anywhere for the time being, so he had to suck it up to a certain extent so we could make the best long term decisions for our family. It is about getting past the individual and immediate preferences of either spouse, and taking a long view of what is best for both (and future children). Once you get to actual firm practices and the kinds of discrimination and obstacles mothers face, that becomes a different and far more troubling issue.dresden doll wrote:And you thought I was kidding when I said that that thread would have worked out differently if genders were switched. Sticking around here for so long has taught me a thing or two.romothesavior wrote:I actually agree with this. Wow. Compare this to the "Husband Forbidding It" thread a few weeks ago where the roles were reversed, and it was very different. Same posters, different argument. Apparently your wife's opinion isn't that important when making a huge decision like this?Holly Golightly wrote:Love how different this thread is than if it had been the other way around. When it's a woman, family wins and that's the sacrifice you make. When it's a man, law school should be the priority. Awesome.
That said, it is important to recognize a few crucial differences between this thread and the "Husband Forbidding It" thread. There were kids involved in the other thread, a crumbling marriage, and the actors involved were older. Those are important factors.
But still, I am a little shocked that in 2010, the way a bunch of young people view marriage is still so sexist.
edit: Glad to see DF was kidding. But there have still been a lot of troubling responses.
At least you get my respect for not being hypocritical.
In terms of the constant chorus of "Everyone in law school gets a divorce" you hear on TLS, transitional times in life are stressful to any marriage. But no more so than illness, the death of parents, financial strain, children, moving, full time jobs, and the million other challenges everyone confronts. Marriage isn't (or won't be) an entirely easy thing for 99% of us. But I am convinced having the right partner makes absolutely everything about life better, including law school.