WUSTL vs. Wisconsin vs. Chicago-Kent Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )

WUSTL vs. Wisconsin vs. Chicago-Kent

WUSTL (33K/year)
37
49%
Wisconsin (17K/year)
29
38%
Chicago-Kent (7K-10K/year)*
10
13%
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: WUSTL vs. Wisconsin vs. Chicago-Kent

Post by romothesavior » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:57 pm

JCougar needs to up his game if he wants Chicago. Petty vandalism? Puhleeze. You need to shoot for embezzlement, fraud, selling Senate seats... shit like that.

User avatar
Regionality

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:13 am

Re: WUSTL vs. Wisconsin vs. Chicago-Kent

Post by Regionality » Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:59 pm

romothesavior wrote:JCougar needs to up his game if he wants Chicago. Petty vandalism? Puhleeze. You need to shoot for embezzlement, fraud, selling Senate seats... shit like that.
Haha yea, you can't pass the bar in Illinois w/o a felony...misdemeanors are pansy shit.

toolfan

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:11 pm

Re: WUSTL vs. Wisconsin vs. Chicago-Kent

Post by toolfan » Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:37 pm

I selected WUSTL, though I think the Kent offer is really hard to beat. Also, how well does WUSTL place in Chicago? (this could be very important to your decision). Although WUSTL is the better choice, a Kent degree for 30k, in the market you want to be in, is hard to beat. Really hard to beat, at least when compared to your other choices.

Congrats tho. You did well to have those kind of options.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”