Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School: #TrustTheProcess Forum
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
I see T14 shakeups discussed regularly on this site, but how likely is it that we might actually soon see a change in the T14?
-
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
0.0%splitterfromhell wrote:I see T14 shakeups discussed regularly on this site, but how likely is it that we might actually soon see a change in the T14?
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
You can see the raw score difference between school in this infographic. http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/usnwr- ... 17-update/splitterfromhell wrote:I see T14 shakeups discussed regularly on this site, but how likely is it that we might actually soon see a change in the T14?
Gtown is pretty close to UT and Vandy but the USNews rankings use overall employment with school funded positions weighing less not bl+fc.
-
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
When ad revenue goes down on USNWR's website and they need to spice something upsplitterfromhell wrote:I see T14 shakeups discussed regularly on this site, but how likely is it that we might actually soon see a change in the T14?
Last edited by GreenEggs on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
So 101?!?Egzon wrote:About 15% of the students are employed by GULC, damn
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 6:01 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
99 and most are short termBVest wrote:So 101?!?Egzon wrote:About 15% of the students are employed by GULC, damn
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
-
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
What are the GULC short-term positions?
Last edited by GreenEggs on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
9 month "entry into practice" fellowships.DCfilterDC wrote:What are the GULC short-term positions?
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Sorry, I back-calculated when I should have gone to the numbers.Egzon wrote:
99 and most are short term
All the same, CSO has a theme song...
99 Georgetown Law grads unemployed
99 Georgetown Law grads
Take this one here
to work at the school for a year
98 Georgetown Law grads unemployed
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Yes.proteinshake wrote:did Cornell really only place 3.82% in federal clerkships or am I doing something wrong? this is way lower than last year.
It was a combination of 2 factors:
1) Class of 2015 was most affected by the hiring plan being dissolved, and at the time we didn't have a dedicated clerkship coordinator to guide anyone through it. There are actually a number of them who lined up clerkships for this Fall when they were 3Ls and thus aren't captured by these stats.
2) The Class of 2015 was generally less interested in clerking. Most of the people in positions that traditionally got them (LR senior board, moot court exec board) didn't apply. My class definitely has more people clerking than c/o 2015.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:27 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
GULC, yeah, they sent 275 kids into Biglaw, not a terrible outcome and still impressive considering that's more than the entire class at some law schools. But 678 class size, holey freaking guacamole!! Maybe if they freaking reduced their class size a little like almost every other law school they could solidify their position in the T14 and improve their numbers. That is an ungodly number of kids, I legitimately don't know a law school with more graduates. 99 kids in school funded positions.
At this rate, Vandy and hopefully UT in the coming years (w/ reduced transfer classes) will be better choices for kids just looking to get into general biglaw regardless of market. UT already placed more into Fed Clerkships (30 vs. 24) with about 1/2 the class size.
Edit: Biglaw #, I previously just counted 500+
Edit: Really telling number. FTLT Bar passage required for GULC = 456/678, 67.2%. UT has 75.7%. Vandy has 78.9%. UCLA has 73.7%. Notre Dame has 73.7%.
At this rate, Vandy and hopefully UT in the coming years (w/ reduced transfer classes) will be better choices for kids just looking to get into general biglaw regardless of market. UT already placed more into Fed Clerkships (30 vs. 24) with about 1/2 the class size.
Edit: Biglaw #, I previously just counted 500+
Edit: Really telling number. FTLT Bar passage required for GULC = 456/678, 67.2%. UT has 75.7%. Vandy has 78.9%. UCLA has 73.7%. Notre Dame has 73.7%.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
eh. c/o 2015 might also all be clerking in 2016.Lavitz wrote:Yes.proteinshake wrote:did Cornell really only place 3.82% in federal clerkships or am I doing something wrong? this is way lower than last year.
It was a combination of 2 factors:
1) Class of 2015 was most affected by the hiring plan being dissolved, and at the time we didn't have a dedicated clerkship coordinator to guide anyone through it. There are actually a number of them who lined up clerkships for this Fall when they were 3Ls and thus aren't captured by these stats.
2) The Class of 2015 was generally less interested in clerking. Most of the people in positions that traditionally got them (LR senior board, moot court exec board) didn't apply. My class definitely has more people clerking than c/o 2015.
IME the vast majority of ppl clerking from new york schools are doing it the year or two years after they graduate. 9-month out clerkship numbers are increasingly meaningless
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
also fuck georgetown. un-fucking-conscionable. I really hope us news puts them behind vandy, but they're useless fucktards over there
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Yes, I know it's becoming increasingly meaningless and that this same phenomenon is probably happening at other schools. But I'm sure our immediately-after-graduation rate could have been higher if not for those two factors, and it will in fact be higher next year.jbagelboy wrote:eh. c/o 2015 might also all be clerking in 2016.
IME the vast majority of ppl clerking from new york schools are doing it the year or two years after they graduate. 9-month out clerkship numbers are increasingly meaningless
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Only if by pre-recession you mean 2007 and 2008. 2015 will likely beat every other year in the 100+ category.MikeJD wrote:For the most part improvements over last year and class sizes keep shrinking which is also good. However, I doubt they are near the pre recession levels especially the non t-14 schools.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. The hiring plan was effectively dissolved by 2012. This is just pure BS from Cornell.Lavitz wrote:Yes.proteinshake wrote:did Cornell really only place 3.82% in federal clerkships or am I doing something wrong? this is way lower than last year.
It was a combination of 2 factors:
1) Class of 2015 was most affected by the hiring plan being dissolved, and at the time we didn't have a dedicated clerkship coordinator to guide anyone through it. There are actually a number of them who lined up clerkships for this Fall when they were 3Ls and thus aren't captured by these stats.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
I hope this thread is the final nail in the coffin for garbage schools like Cornell, Michigan, GULC, and Penn
Also: WHOO HOO VANDY AWESOME YEAH. Is it too late to transfer? I'd like to get off this sinking ship if I can.
(Seriously though: LOL Georgetown)
Also: WHOO HOO VANDY AWESOME YEAH. Is it too late to transfer? I'd like to get off this sinking ship if I can.
(Seriously though: LOL Georgetown)
- UVAIce
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
The sad thing is that almost everyone I know outside of the legal profession would be more impressed if I graduated from Georgetown.
But seriously, there needs to be a public shaming of GULC's administration. They have such a large class to begin with and then take oodles of transfers for the money.
But seriously, there needs to be a public shaming of GULC's administration. They have such a large class to begin with and then take oodles of transfers for the money.
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
It was definitely coding, but attempts to resuscitate it continued through the summer and fall of 2013 before it was officially declared dead at the beginning of 2014.rpupkin wrote:I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. The hiring plan was effectively dissolved by 2012. This is just pure BS from Cornell.Lavitz wrote:Yes.proteinshake wrote:did Cornell really only place 3.82% in federal clerkships or am I doing something wrong? this is way lower than last year.
It was a combination of 2 factors:
1) Class of 2015 was most affected by the hiring plan being dissolved, and at the time we didn't have a dedicated clerkship coordinator to guide anyone through it. There are actually a number of them who lined up clerkships for this Fall when they were 3Ls and thus aren't captured by these stats.
e: not to say the excuses presented are the reason Cornell placed so poorly. I suspect it had more to do with not having a dedicated clerkship coordinator at the time than any issues with the plan; that tends to be a big factor for schools.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
The only actually-justified schadenfreude here is for GULC. 500-some matriculants plus 100-ish transfers each class, year after year, is legit shameful.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
just learned a new wordcron1834 wrote:The only actually-justified schadenfreude here is for GULC. 500-some matriculants plus 100-ish transfers each class, year after year, is legit shameful.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Sure, a ton of judges had moved off-plan, but Cornell students in c/o 2014 continued getting clerkships with on-plan judges during their 2L summer. But yeah, whatever, maybe that's not a compelling reason for lower clerkship numbers. Regardless, the new administration has been pushing clerkships hard, and the numbers will be up next year. I don't think they'll match c/o 2014 though.rpupkin wrote:I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. The hiring plan was effectively dissolved by 2012. This is just pure BS from Cornell.
More importantly, none of this justifies the fact that biglaw percentage didn't increase to compensate for the lower clerkship percentage. Probably fair to say c/o 2015 had less desirable outcomes than c/o 2014.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login