Not necessarily. At least for PE or IB, you could could probably get away with merely having your shit together around the beginning of your junior year. (Assuming you go to a target and aren't insufferable during interviews.)eljefe1 wrote:UVAIce wrote:We don't need to assume everyone could get into these other fields, just that a significant quantity could if they set their mind to it.eljefe1 wrote:You're still assuming that everyone going to law school and assuming the risk of striking out at OCI is qualified for the careers you listed.
The reduction in expected earnings in all those fields due to the probability of failure is equal to, or less than, the same probability of striking out in OCI. However, the lack of over-specialization and crippling debt load makes the costs of failure less.
Yes, but the time to "set their mind to it" passed 4 years ago, when they started undergrad.
Unfortunately when you're at that stage of deciding sticker-or-not, it's a bit late in the day to break into anything like that. But the point being made while offering those alternatives wasn't that they were viable for people making that decision, but rather that they do exist and claiming that life is a binary system of either law school or sub-50K is false. Although Muskies backpeddled on that point by going from sub-50 to "50 maybe 75 maybe 100 lol."