How difficult is it to get a state clerking position? Could students from Penn, UVA, and Cornell be equally competitive?guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School Forum
- CR7
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:09 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 9:44 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Agree with this. Mich's total clerk (fed+state/local) is 20.5%, which is huge. UVA for example is 17.6% (albeit more of these are fed - 14.5% vs. 12.8%).guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
Michigan also has the highest % in government of the lower T13s posted so far at 8.3% (UVA closest at 6.7%).
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
state clerkships are super variable so it's hard to know whether they are good outcomes. A clerkship on the California Supreme Court with Goodwin Liu is harder to get than some federal appellate clerkships. Intermediate state clerkship in Iowa or Minnesota not so much.CR7 wrote:How difficult is it to get a state clerking position? Could students from Penn, UVA, and Cornell be equally competitive?guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
- guynourmin
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
there's no way to say. There are some incredible state clerkships most people would take over various federal clerkships, and, I would imagine, there are a lot of state clerkships people pursue because there were literally no other options. We assume at lower ranked schools that their state clerkships are the latter, but at a school like Michigan it could go either way. There are hundreds of people clerking at state supreme courts every year.CR7 wrote:How difficult is it to get a state clerking position? Could students from Penn, UVA, and Cornell be equally competitive?guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
- CR7
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:09 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Thanks! Is it still safe to say Penn, UVA, and Cornell have objectively better employment numbers than Michigan, regardless of state clerkships?curry1 wrote:state clerkships are super variable so it's hard to know whether they are good outcomes. A clerkship on the California Supreme Court with Goodwin Liu is harder to get than some federal appellate clerkships. Intermediate state clerkship in Iowa or Minnesota not so much.CR7 wrote:How difficult is it to get a state clerking position? Could students from Penn, UVA, and Cornell be equally competitive?guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
I wish I wrote down the nhmber of state Supreme Court clerkships that Michigan posted at their ASW. I'll check if I did when I got home, but she did mention it
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Yes.CR7 wrote:Thanks! Is it still safe to say Penn, UVA, and Cornell have objectively better employment numbers than Michigan, regardless of state clerkships?curry1 wrote:state clerkships are super variable so it's hard to know whether they are good outcomes. A clerkship on the California Supreme Court with Goodwin Liu is harder to get than some federal appellate clerkships. Intermediate state clerkship in Iowa or Minnesota not so much.CR7 wrote:How difficult is it to get a state clerking position? Could students from Penn, UVA, and Cornell be equally competitive?guybourdin wrote:above someone asked why Mich's numbers were so low and that PI doesn't totally explain it. Mich has more state clerks than Penn, UVA, and Cornell combined. That's not a bad thing - they could have sent most of those to var state supreme courts for all we know - but it just explains where some of those other students are.Thelaw23 wrote:guybourdin wrote:Mich also has a pretty high state clerk number here.
The fed clerk number is pretty high though. Maybe the students from UMich just opt to apply for less competitive fed circuits/districts?
- LawMan16
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:06 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
CLS released its numbers on April 14th last year, so hopefully this week.Thelaw23 wrote:When will we see CLS and NYU stats?
- guynourmin
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
that is not for me to tell you - there is a lot of information available for you to prioritize what is important to you. if you want biglaw, I would choose all those schools over Michigan at equal cost, sure. It depends on what you want, though - for example, over 7 years Cornell had one Skadden/EJW fellow, whereas Michigan had 21. Again, what is important to you? I don't think asking if one school has "objectively better employment numbers" is the right question. If you are choosing between these schools, then you're in a great position and you would be doing yourself a disservice by just trying to answer that question. (again, if you want biglaw, then, yes, those schools seem to be better options)CR7 wrote: Thanks! Is it still safe to say Penn, UVA, and Cornell have objectively better employment numbers than Michigan, regardless of state clerkships?
- Iwanttolawschool
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Penn, yes. UVA, maybe. Cornell, no. Comparing one school's % against another's % isn't necessarily an apples to apples comparison. Penn, UVA, and Michigan are held in higher regard than Cornell in the legal world. You can see this by what types of jobs/type of firms these grads end up at.guybourdin wrote:that is not for me to tell you - there is a lot of information available for you to prioritize what is important to you. if you want biglaw, I would choose all those schools over Michigan at equal cost, sure. It depends on what you want, though - for example, over 7 years Cornell had one Skadden/EJW fellow, whereas Michigan had 21. Again, what is important to you? I don't think asking if one school has "objectively better employment numbers" is the right question. If you are choosing between these schools, then you're in a great position and you would be doing yourself a disservice by just trying to answer that question. (again, if you want biglaw, then, yes, those schools seem to be better options)CR7 wrote: Thanks! Is it still safe to say Penn, UVA, and Cornell have objectively better employment numbers than Michigan, regardless of state clerkships?
Michigan having 66% in BL + FC with the PI oriented culture Mich has is actually a surprise to me. I would have thought it would be lower. Not because these grads couldn't get some average V75 firm job, but because they don't want them.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Tulane:
199 total class size
24 full time/long term in firms of 101+
18 full time/long term in federal clerkships
= 21.11%
http://www.law.tulane.edu/uploadedFiles ... Report.pdf
199 total class size
24 full time/long term in firms of 101+
18 full time/long term in federal clerkships
= 21.11%
http://www.law.tulane.edu/uploadedFiles ... Report.pdf
-
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
No one has explained why Michigan kids would opt for state Supreme Court clerkships over federal clerkships at a higher rate than students at other PI-friendly t13s (or t13s in general). There's also a lack of evidence that those state and local clerkships are indeed uber-competitive SSC clerkships as opposed to just intermediate/trial court clerkships.
It's more likely that, for whatever reason, UM just does a worse job at placing kids in BL+FC than almost all of the rest of the t13
It's more likely that, for whatever reason, UM just does a worse job at placing kids in BL+FC than almost all of the rest of the t13
Last edited by cheaptilts on Tue Apr 11, 2017 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Robb
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Chicago: 78.2% (61% biglaw + 17% fed clerks) (down from 82.7% last year = -4.5%). Interesting takeaway of 100% employment overall (98% bar passage required), which I've not seen before.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
- Robb
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
If you're including my post in that, pretty sure it's 78.2%, not 78.1%. .67*(.042+.132+.743)+.191*.878=78.2088%.Nebby wrote:Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
UCLA is up.
https://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Car ... 52-45.ashx
127 grads in 100+ firms
8 grads in Fed Clerks
316 total grads
42.72% Biglaw/Fed Clerk [2015 was 45.07%, so -2.35% this year]
https://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Car ... 52-45.ashx
127 grads in 100+ firms
8 grads in Fed Clerks
316 total grads
42.72% Biglaw/Fed Clerk [2015 was 45.07%, so -2.35% this year]
- LawMan16
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:06 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
The Yale percentage appears to be incorrect. It should be 72.9%, not 74.4%.Nebby wrote:Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
101-250: 8
251-500: 6
501+: 65
FC: 69
--------
Total: 148
148 is 72.9064% of 203 total graduates.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Ouch. Hope UT at least does better than this sorry performance.favabeansoup wrote:UCLA is up.
https://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Car ... 52-45.ashx
127 grads in 100+ firms
8 grads in Fed Clerks
316 total grads
42.72% Biglaw/Fed Clerk [2015 was 45.07%, so -2.35% this year]
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Yeah UCLA's isn't bad but it's surprisingly weak considering peer schools are all up (no word on USC yet).
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Lol Mich
As for UCLA- much like Chicago, garbage school is garbage. Nothing to see here.
(frantically tries to think of more ways to reverse jinx UT)
(resigns self to 42% big law+federal clerk, afraid won't be able to show his face on TLS again like so many Nebbys)
(cries)
As for UCLA- much like Chicago, garbage school is garbage. Nothing to see here.
(frantically tries to think of more ways to reverse jinx UT)
(resigns self to 42% big law+federal clerk, afraid won't be able to show his face on TLS again like so many Nebbys)
(cries)
- guynourmin
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:42 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
(6+19+107+36)/215 = .78140. where are you getting all your numbers?Robb wrote:If you're including my post in that, pretty sure it's 78.2%, not 78.1%. .67*(.042+.132+.743)+.191*.878=78.2088%.Nebby wrote:Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Torres1893
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:21 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
On reddit someone said they called the admissions office of UT to ask about it and they said they will release the info on the 15th.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
what farts are you huffing?Robb wrote:If you're including my post in that, pretty sure it's 78.2%, not 78.1%. .67*(.042+.132+.743)+.191*.878=78.2088%.Nebby wrote:Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
168/215
eta: scooped
- Robb
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Ah, I did not see they had the raw numbers. Much better way to do it.Nebby wrote:what farts are you huffing?Robb wrote:If you're including my post in that, pretty sure it's 78.2%, not 78.1%. .67*(.042+.132+.743)+.191*.878=78.2088%.Nebby wrote:Some of yall suck at math. Half the time I check your percentages they're wrong
168/215
eta: scooped
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:33 am
Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School
Is there usually any distinction between fulltime long term school funded positions and fulltime short term school funded positions. Or are they usually both seen as equally bad?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login