Yeah, I used to wonder why so many people at work were fucking each other and now I understand.IAFG wrote:The #1 complaint I hear from my peers is about their inability to successfully date. I don't care if your dad and all 20 of your cousins are in biglaw. It's not compatible with a bustling social life.
The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers Forum
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
- KatyMarie
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:16 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
No, thanks for commenting on this with a different perspective! That all sounds really cool and it's helpful for me (and I suspect other 0Ls) to have an idea of what the good (as well as the bad of course) can look like along different career paths. It's easy to get focused on Big Law as a goal and to forget that there's other desirable outcomes as well.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Belatedly, and maybe inappropriately since this thread is almost all about biglaw, but I'm a government lawyer and I like my job a lot: reasonable hours, reasonable pay, reasonably interesting work. Probably the biggest difference, though, is that I run my own cases from start to finish [admittedly with lots and lots of help at this point], and the hierarchy is different. I'd say it's flatter - I have a supervisor, and then there's a division head above her, but obviously there aren't any partners (or aiming for partnership) and everyone in the office, unless they have a supervisory position, has the same title.KatyMarie wrote:Welp.
[*]Big Law + debt = Miserable Tedious Job + Long, stressful hours + Job Insecurity + No Money + No Friends
[*]Big Law no debt = Miserable Tedious Job + Long, stressful hours + Job Insecurity + Some Money + No Friends
[*]Small Law = Miserable Tedious Job + Long, stressful hours + No Money + [Unclear on Friends/Job Insecurity situation here]
[*]Nothing in the middle exists.
Do any practicing lawyers have anything good to say about their jobs? I promise I won't run out go enroll in St. John's for sticker price if you give me an example of something you find enjoyable/rewarding about your career that you haven't found elsewhere.
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
My friends and I are pretty good about Sunday Fundays, but we're all in biglaw so things get cancelled pretty regularly.KatyMarie wrote:The attorneys at my firm at least pretend to have some personal relationships outside of work that they care about and actively cultivate...but they could all just be really good actors and they're actually dying inside.californiauser wrote: didnt realize being a 0l precluded me from knowing people and having family members who work/have worked in big law
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
So much this. I'd probably have ended up at the same school for personal reasons, and I got the job I wanted out of that school, and I don't even care too much about debt because I don't have kids so fuck it, but it would have been awesome to have this outcome with no or less debt.spleenworship wrote:I wish I'd worked harder and gotten even less debt.
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Seriously. One retake and Id be below six figures probably.A. Nony Mouse wrote:So much this. I'd probably have ended up at the same school for personal reasons, and I got the job I wanted out of that school, and I don't even care too much about debt because I don't have kids so fuck it, but it would have been awesome to have this outcome with no or less debt.spleenworship wrote:I wish I'd worked harder and gotten even less debt.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:36 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
.
Last edited by BigBlackTruck on Sat Mar 07, 2015 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:45 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
If you are govt, are you on PSLF? Debt free in 10 years no?A. Nony Mouse wrote:So much this. I'd probably have ended up at the same school for personal reasons, and I got the job I wanted out of that school, and I don't even care too much about debt because I don't have kids so fuck it, but it would have been awesome to have this outcome with no or less debt.spleenworship wrote:I wish I'd worked harder and gotten even less debt.
- Hipster but Athletic
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
So what's the TLS opinion about the following dilemma (non-NYC):
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
What does the 20 person firm doHipster but Athletic wrote:So what's the TLS opinion about the following dilemma (non-NYC):
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
- Hipster but Athletic
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
does it matter that much so long as it's not like DUI?
let's say l&e lit
let's say l&e lit
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Debtload?Hipster but Athletic wrote:So what's the TLS opinion about the following dilemma (non-NYC):
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
How do you know it's "pretty regular hours"
- Hipster but Athletic
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
a)150k?Desert Fox wrote:Debtload?Hipster but Athletic wrote:So what's the TLS opinion about the following dilemma (non-NYC):
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
How do you know it's "pretty regular hours"
b)bc it's a hypo? (don't fuck with hypos, gunner)
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
That's the plan, but a lot of shit can go down in 10 years.buffalo_ wrote:If you are govt, are you on PSLF? Debt free in 10 years no?A. Nony Mouse wrote:So much this. I'd probably have ended up at the same school for personal reasons, and I got the job I wanted out of that school, and I don't even care too much about debt because I don't have kids so fuck it, but it would have been awesome to have this outcome with no or less debt.spleenworship wrote:I wish I'd worked harder and gotten even less debt.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I'd take the $75k but I'm also pretty lazy and like having a life outside of work. YMMV.Hipster but Athletic wrote:a)150k?Desert Fox wrote:Debtload?Hipster but Athletic wrote:So what's the TLS opinion about the following dilemma (non-NYC):
75k starting @ 20 person firm working pretty regular hours or 135 at a prestigious grindhouse?
How do you know it's "pretty regular hours"
b)bc it's a hypo? (don't fuck with hypos, gunner)
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Do you guys think biglaw is so bad that it's not worth going into even as a short-term launching pad into other areas? If you had no debt, what would you have done? My impression has been that in-house and government positions are not generally open to recent grads--what other starting paths would you advocate to get there?
I guess I've long been of the opinion that it's mostly the debt that really crushes people moreso than the job itself. Before LS, I worked 50-60+ hour weeks at a physically-demanding job. The work was busier around holidays. The schedule was unpredictable and I routinely got called into work at 4am the next morning after 10pm the night before. I was expected to always be on call and didn't even get provided a phone by the company. My company neither promoted based on competence nor seniority but based on incompetence (sounds ludicrous but literally was a running gag within the company). Oh and I made like $30k. I mean that whole experience sucked, but I never felt like it was really ruining my life, probably because I wasn't indebted. People without degrees got it hard, man.
I guess I've long been of the opinion that it's mostly the debt that really crushes people moreso than the job itself. Before LS, I worked 50-60+ hour weeks at a physically-demanding job. The work was busier around holidays. The schedule was unpredictable and I routinely got called into work at 4am the next morning after 10pm the night before. I was expected to always be on call and didn't even get provided a phone by the company. My company neither promoted based on competence nor seniority but based on incompetence (sounds ludicrous but literally was a running gag within the company). Oh and I made like $30k. I mean that whole experience sucked, but I never felt like it was really ruining my life, probably because I wasn't indebted. People without degrees got it hard, man.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
That job was shit, how many years did you hang on?Crowing wrote:Do you guys think biglaw is so bad that it's not worth going into even as a short-term launching pad into other areas? If you had no debt, what would you have done? My impression has been that in-house and government positions are not generally open to recent grads--what other starting paths would you advocate to get there?
I guess I've long been of the opinion that it's mostly the debt that really crushes people moreso than the job itself. Before LS, I worked 50-60+ hour weeks at a physically-demanding job. The work was busier around holidays. The schedule was unpredictable and I routinely got called into work at 4am the next morning after 10pm the night before. I was expected to always be on call and didn't even get provided a phone by the company. My company neither promoted based on competence nor seniority but based on incompetence (sounds ludicrous but literally was a running gag within the company). Oh and I made like $30k. I mean that whole experience sucked, but I never felt like it was really ruining my life, probably because I wasn't indebted. People without degrees got it hard, man.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Here's the thing. When I was a 0L, in 2008-09, HYS at sticker was TCR. But three things have happened since then:Pneumonia wrote:Is HYS sticker still credited? Say for a splitter that doesn't have any T14 full rides or even big money anywhere really? Btw sticker at H is 315k now, at repayment, assuming COL and tuition increases etc.
1) We have much better idea about placement in the lower T14. There were legitimately lots of people who believed that lower T14 would be top 1/3 to get big law, and CCN would be top half to get it. But now we have data showing that the lower T14 is a lot more secure than that. I think, if anything, people overestimate the grades required to get big law from a T14.
2) PAY-E and temporary school jobs mean that you'll still be able to eat if you strike out.
3) Sticker costs have continued to go up while salaries have not. I paid sticker at NU, and came out with under $240k. If I had been at all responsible with my money between 1L summer and 2L summer, I could've kept it under $220k. But sticker at most schools now is pushing $300k or more. That's literally an extra $700/month for 10 years on a big law salary that isn't any bigger since 2007.
If I didn't have big money in the T14, I guess I'd do Harvard at sticker, but since when do splitters get into Harvard?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Pneumonia
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I guess splitters getting into Harvard is the 4th thing to have happened since 08/09. Several 3.5x's have swung it this cycle.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Ray what are you gonna do post clerkship.
-
- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:21 am
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
For some of you in biglaw now: what are you guys considering for the end game?
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
I'd like to hear about this from the litigation side, since I've heard that in-house jobs are not as easy to get if you're a litigator. AUSA sounds nice but these seem super competitive. What other exit options are there for litigation?Theopliske8711 wrote:For some of you in biglaw now: what are you guys considering for the end game?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
State AG, p side, smaller firms, other state and local govtRahviveh wrote:I'd like to hear about this from the litigation side, since I've heard that in-house jobs are not as easy to get if you're a litigator. AUSA sounds nice but these seem super competitive. What other exit options are there for litigation?Theopliske8711 wrote:For some of you in biglaw now: what are you guys considering for the end game?
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
Are exit options more secure in litigational or transactional?IAFG wrote:State AG, p side, smaller firms, other state and local govtRahviveh wrote:I'd like to hear about this from the litigation side, since I've heard that in-house jobs are not as easy to get if you're a litigator. AUSA sounds nice but these seem super competitive. What other exit options are there for litigation?Theopliske8711 wrote:For some of you in biglaw now: what are you guys considering for the end game?
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
What do you mean, secure? There is a huge variety of things people leave firms to do, from every practice area.HRomanus wrote:Are exit options more secure in litigational or transactional?IAFG wrote:State AG, p side, smaller firms, other state and local govtRahviveh wrote:I'd like to hear about this from the litigation side, since I've heard that in-house jobs are not as easy to get if you're a litigator. AUSA sounds nice but these seem super competitive. What other exit options are there for litigation?Theopliske8711 wrote:For some of you in biglaw now: what are you guys considering for the end game?
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm
Re: The fundamental problem with practicing lawyers
As far as availability, income, QOL, etc.IAFG wrote:What do you mean, secure? There is a huge variety of things people leave firms to do, from every practice area.HRomanus wrote:Are exit options more secure in litigational or transactional?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login