How does that even make sense? If you don't enjoy your life in NYC, chances are there is somewhere in the entire world where you'd be happier. Either that or it's time for prozacccs224 wrote:While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.
Cities with best Quality of Life Forum
- James Bond
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
- Jay-Electronica
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
lmaoooooooJames Bond wrote:How does that even make sense? If you don't enjoy your life in NYC, chances are there is somewhere in the entire world where you'd be happier. Either that or it's time for prozacccs224 wrote:While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.
exactly what I was thinking. It was precisely the response I was expecting as well. Typical.
- James Bond
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
...you really can see the future?Negrodamus wrote:lmaoooooooJames Bond wrote:How does that even make sense? If you don't enjoy your life in NYC, chances are there is somewhere in the entire world where you'd be happier. Either that or it's time for prozacccs224 wrote:While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.
exactly what I was thinking. It was precisely the response I was expecting as well. Typical.
- Jay-Electronica
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Of course, I knew you would buy the macbook.James Bond wrote:...you really can see the future?Negrodamus wrote:lmaoooooooJames Bond wrote:How does that even make sense? If you don't enjoy your life in NYC, chances are there is somewhere in the entire world where you'd be happier. Either that or it's time for prozacccs224 wrote:While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.
exactly what I was thinking. It was precisely the response I was expecting as well. Typical.

-
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
[/quote]Eazy E wrote:ccs224 wrote: You don't have to earn 250k a year to enjoy NYC. I'm making not even a fifth of that, and I still love the city. The fact is, New York is the center of so many great and diverse aspects of cultural life (the arts, music, dance, publishing, journalism, music again etc) and most people can benefit from these directly or indirectly. That said, there's a lot it lacks. It's crowded and dirty. If you don't make a shit ton of money, you probably won't be able to own a place (unless you want to own a three family apartment building with rent controlled tenants in Bushwick or Bed-Stuy), and will be a renter and commuter for most of you life. It lacks natural beauty and accessibility to non-urban areas. However, after being in NYC for awhile, it becomes very difficult to respect most other places. While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.[/quote]
I LOL'd. Reminds me of the Bay Area attitude: even though we're all broke, we'll NEVER leave.
hahaha, exactly. NYCers, Bay-ers, and Texans need to be shot. Those 3 are probably the worst for this mentality despite many of them never having lived anywhere else (in America). I said in America because it seems most NYCers and Bay-ers were born abroad.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jules Winnfield
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
DC, Boston or Atlanta...I still can't believe that DC or ATL is not an option.
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
That is sort of the point though. I don't claim that NYC is objectively better, but it certainly starts to feel superior after you've put in enough time. As you can see, this may cause difficulties with actual Americans.You don't have to earn 250k a year to enjoy NYC. I'm making not even a fifth of that, and I still love the city. The fact is, New York is the center of so many great and diverse aspects of cultural life (the arts, music, dance, publishing, journalism, music again etc) and most people can benefit from these directly or indirectly. That said, there's a lot it lacks. It's crowded and dirty. If you don't make a shit ton of money, you probably won't be able to own a place (unless you want to own a three family apartment building with rent controlled tenants in Bushwick or Bed-Stuy), and will be a renter and commuter for most of you life. It lacks natural beauty and accessibility to non-urban areas. However, after being in NYC for awhile, it becomes very difficult to respect most other places. While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.
I LOL'd. Reminds me of the Bay Area attitude: even though we're all broke, we'll NEVER leave.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Having lived in SF a long time I can safely say not here.
- brose002
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
where's minneapolis?
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Still hibernating for the winter, probably.brose002 wrote:where's minneapolis?
-
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
After being physically accosted by SF homeless, I'm gonna say yes, they are a negative. SF and DC are automatically disqualified in this competition just by the sheer number they have per square mile.prezidentv8 wrote:Um, yeah but you're presupposing that our homeless people are a negative. Case in point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Famous_Bushman. Regarding the drugs, not hard to avoid. Regarding the wind, it's worth having it the first time you watch a visiting shortstop muff a pop up in person.fortissimo wrote:It has more homeless people and drug users in any square mile than any other big city I've been to, except for maybe DC, which also has homeless but much fewer open drug users. It's also perpetually windier than most other big cities. If you get rid of the "people" that live there, then maybe it has a shot.BioEBear2010 wrote:San Francisco is the best. Sure it can be expensive, but having the beach, desert, snow, and forest within a 4 hour driving radius is pretty awesome. Also, the weather kicks the crap out of most of the other cities listed.
Last edited by fortissimo on Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- mbusch22
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Has anyone mentioned Dallas? I love Dallas and the economy is doing way better than most places in the country. Weather is great, city is awesome.
- fenderjsm88
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:58 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Okay, I'm in San Diego this week and I have to say, this place kicks ass. It's a good thing I didn't go to San Diego State (the biggest party school down here, located in the Pacific Beach neighborhood) - I never would have finished college! (Then again, I'm sure their curriculum is a joke.)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
This has probably been brought up somewhere in the past 14 pages...
But what about Los Angeles?! Beaches, attractions, nightlife, weather, entertainment, celebrities, and on and on. Hands down one of the best places to live for anyone in their 20s or even 30s. Be sure to keep close to the Westwood though and not that crummy side of town where USC is...
But what about Los Angeles?! Beaches, attractions, nightlife, weather, entertainment, celebrities, and on and on. Hands down one of the best places to live for anyone in their 20s or even 30s. Be sure to keep close to the Westwood though and not that crummy side of town where USC is...
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
SDSU is nowhere near Pacific Beach.fenderjsm88 wrote:Okay, I'm in San Diego this week and I have to say, this place kicks ass. It's a good thing I didn't go to San Diego State (the biggest party school down here, located in the Pacific Beach neighborhood) - I never would have finished college! (Then again, I'm sure their curriculum is a joke.)
- taw856
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:05 pm
Re: Cities with best Quality of Life
Did not read this thread, but I think we need some bracket style polls in a less ridiculous format than the best places to practice law STL/KC combination over at ATL.
Or not, either way.
For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_U ... ical_Areas .
Or not, either way.
For reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_U ... ical_Areas .
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login