Jules Winnfield wrote:Probably not. But he did say one time that his best friend is black...SpaceDawg wrote:Have you met like 5 black guys?
black best friend=being black
Jules Winnfield wrote:Probably not. But he did say one time that his best friend is black...SpaceDawg wrote:Have you met like 5 black guys?
SimplyC26 wrote:fenderjsm88 wrote:Just spent the winter in Chicago. I disagree. And apparently this was a relatively mild winter...samer wrote:Chicago:
Gorgeous seasons. Lake Michigan. Great Downtown. Cool areas to live like Lincoln Park, Wrigleyville, Streeterville, Gold Coast, etc. Great sports town as far as we have all the sports you would want, not necessarily that we're great at all (or any) of them. Winters can be a little rough, but the summers are great. Not as expensive as LA or NYC but the salaries will be about the same so you get "more bang for your buck" if you will.
Da Bears
+1 I currently live in Chicago and can't wait to leave. Not only does the weather suck, but the sales tax rate is one of the highest in the nation. Furthermore, crime is high and every part of the city that is halfway decent is quite expensive.
I'm not so sure about that. But, the way James Bond said it (meaning, time and place) was suspicious to say the least.anthonyc350 wrote:Jules Winnfield wrote:Probably not. But he did say one time that his best friend is black...SpaceDawg wrote:Have you met like 5 black guys?
black best friend=being black
The fact that you have to live in the same city that Da Bears play in is more than enough reason to write Chicago off as a crappy city.fenderjsm88 wrote:Just spent the winter in Chicago. I disagree. And apparently this was a relatively mild winter...samer wrote:Chicago:
Gorgeous seasons. Lake Michigan. Great Downtown. Cool areas to live like Lincoln Park, Wrigleyville, Streeterville, Gold Coast, etc. Great sports town as far as we have all the sports you would want, not necessarily that we're great at all (or any) of them. Winters can be a little rough, but the summers are great. Not as expensive as LA or NYC but the salaries will be about the same so you get "more bang for your buck" if you will.
Da Bears
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Those cities are like, my two favorite.rondemarino wrote:Can you reasonably expect more than a couple of people on TLS to have lived in enough of the aforementioned to cities so as to form a mildly educated opinion on each city's QoL? I've lived in San Fran and Philly. Prefer San Fran, but for all I know Portland and Chicago are better places to live. It'd probably be more useful to survey some other sourc that actually figures out a way to make some reasonable assessment of each of cities' QoL.
You are assuming one's insight is only useful if they've lived in all of the listed cities. Your choice of SF over Philly can be plenty useful to others as well.rondemarino wrote:Can you reasonably expect more than a couple of people on TLS to have lived in enough of the aforementioned to cities so as to form a mildly educated opinion on each city's QoL? I've lived in San Fran and Philly. Prefer San Fran, but for all I know Portland and Chicago are better places to live. It'd probably be more useful to survey some other sourc that actually figures out a way to make some reasonable assessment of each of cities' QoL.
Apparently you missed the winky face. Philly is a shithole and literally every black person I've met there is shit while black people I know from all over the country are awesome, but the answer to my "Coincidence?" question is "No shit it's a coincidence." The internet's not that serious, dawgSpaceDawg wrote:
Yes. You must have limited experience with Philadelphia. When I moved here from NYC I was surprised how friendly everyone was, how many fantastic restaurants there were and how affordable the housing was. It's far from perfect but it has come a long way in the last 10 years. And honestly, I don't think I've ever been to a port that didn't smell. Have you met like 5 black guys?
Pretty sure I backed it up with pics on multiple occasionsJules Winnfield wrote:I'm not so sure about that. But, the way James Bond said it (meaning, time and place) was suspicious to say the least.anthonyc350 wrote:Jules Winnfield wrote:Probably not. But he did say one time that his best friend is black...SpaceDawg wrote:Have you met like 5 black guys?
black best friend=being black
James Bond wrote:
Pretty sure I backed it up with pics on multiple occasions![]()
and pretty sure some moron told me that I really wasn't friends with a black person because my best friend's actually from africa not america
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
It has more homeless people and drug users in any square mile than any other big city I've been to, except for maybe DC, which also has homeless but much fewer open drug users. It's also perpetually windier than most other big cities. If you get rid of the "people" that live there, then maybe it has a shot.BioEBear2010 wrote:San Francisco is the best. Sure it can be expensive, but having the beach, desert, snow, and forest within a 4 hour driving radius is pretty awesome. Also, the weather kicks the crap out of most of the other cities listed.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
You don't have to earn 250k a year to enjoy NYC. I'm making not even a fifth of that, and I still love the city. The fact is, New York is the center of so many great and diverse aspects of cultural life (the arts, music, dance, publishing, journalism, music again etc) and most people can benefit from these directly or indirectly. That said, there's a lot it lacks. It's crowded and dirty. If you don't make a shit ton of money, you probably won't be able to own a place (unless you want to own a three family apartment building with rent controlled tenants in Bushwick or Bed-Stuy), and will be a renter and commuter for most of you life. It lacks natural beauty and accessibility to non-urban areas. However, after being in NYC for awhile, it becomes very difficult to respect most other places. While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.Negrodamus wrote:TLS has a pretty strong NY bias as evinced by the POLL. lol
One of you NY people--in all your glory--please explain to me how NY has the best QOL? Is this assuming you earn 250K/yr+?
Um, yeah but you're presupposing that our homeless people are a negative. Case in point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Famous_Bushman. Regarding the drugs, not hard to avoid. Regarding the wind, it's worth having it the first time you watch a visiting shortstop muff a pop up in person.fortissimo wrote:It has more homeless people and drug users in any square mile than any other big city I've been to, except for maybe DC, which also has homeless but much fewer open drug users. It's also perpetually windier than most other big cities. If you get rid of the "people" that live there, then maybe it has a shot.BioEBear2010 wrote:San Francisco is the best. Sure it can be expensive, but having the beach, desert, snow, and forest within a 4 hour driving radius is pretty awesome. Also, the weather kicks the crap out of most of the other cities listed.
ccs224 wrote:You don't have to earn 250k a year to enjoy NYC. I'm making not even a fifth of that, and I still love the city. The fact is, New York is the center of so many great and diverse aspects of cultural life (the arts, music, dance, publishing, journalism, music again etc) and most people can benefit from these directly or indirectly. That said, there's a lot it lacks. It's crowded and dirty. If you don't make a shit ton of money, you probably won't be able to own a place (unless you want to own a three family apartment building with rent controlled tenants in Bushwick or Bed-Stuy), and will be a renter and commuter for most of you life. It lacks natural beauty and accessibility to non-urban areas. However, after being in NYC for awhile, it becomes very difficult to respect most other places. While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.Negrodamus wrote:TLS has a pretty strong NY bias as evinced by the POLL. lol
One of you NY people--in all your glory--please explain to me how NY has the best QOL? Is this assuming you earn 250K/yr+?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I couldn't have said it better myself.ccs224 wrote:You don't have to earn 250k a year to enjoy NYC. I'm making not even a fifth of that, and I still love the city. The fact is, New York is the center of so many great and diverse aspects of cultural life (the arts, music, dance, publishing, journalism, music again etc) and most people can benefit from these directly or indirectly. That said, there's a lot it lacks. It's crowded and dirty. If you don't make a shit ton of money, you probably won't be able to own a place (unless you want to own a three family apartment building with rent controlled tenants in Bushwick or Bed-Stuy), and will be a renter and commuter for most of you life. It lacks natural beauty and accessibility to non-urban areas. However, after being in NYC for awhile, it becomes very difficult to respect most other places. While you might not always enjoy your life here, you can atleast rest assured that it's better than life elsewhere.Negrodamus wrote:TLS has a pretty strong NY bias as evinced by the POLL. lol
One of you NY people--in all your glory--please explain to me how NY has the best QOL? Is this assuming you earn 250K/yr+?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login