(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:35 pm
Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?

-
trebekismyhero

- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm
Post
by trebekismyhero » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:36 pm
Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
-
registering

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:41 am
Post
by registering » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:48 pm
curry1 wrote:proteinshake wrote:I feel like GULC would be a real solid option if they cut their class to <400.
GULC would collapse if they didn't maintain their gargantuan class size due to their lackluster endowment. It's going to be T13 for the foreseeable future.
I feel like it can shed like 30-60 students though. GULC pretty much peaks around 290-320 students landing BL+FC (299, 303, 299 for the past 3 years) to a record low of around ~230 during the recession. Most of the changes to its BL+FC rate come hand in hand with class size, not raw gains in numbers, which pretty much plateaued in 2013. Last year's 4% drop was because the class size went from 626 in 2014 to 678 in 2015, for instance (you can probably estimate its placement this year using class size). If it had controlled its class to be under 600 and preferably closer to 550, it'd be at 50% and place around as well as Michigan or Boalt in a bad year.
-
Dr. Nefario

- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Post
by Dr. Nefario » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:51 pm
trebekismyhero wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
UIUC topping BU, that one is gonna sting.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Tiago Splitter

- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Post
by Tiago Splitter » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:51 pm
registering wrote:
I feel like it can shed like 30-60 students though.
It most certainly can. But that would require things like smart planning and sacrifice among the overpaid faculty and administration. A bridge too far I'm afraid.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:52 pm
I imagine "GULC" is the sound that a formerly top law school would make while in its death throes.
-
curry1

- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Post
by curry1 » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:53 pm
Tiago Splitter wrote:registering wrote:
I feel like it can shed like 30-60 students though.
It most certainly can. But that would require things like smart planning and sacrifice among the overpaid faculty and administration. A bridge too far I'm afraid.
nope, boomer professors deserve to make 500k per year - didn't you know that they could take their talents to firms and make 7 figures? Law schools also definitely need a million clinics and administrators in obscure areas of the law which virtually no law student will ever work in.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:54 pm
Yo somebody tag me in when UT drops. I've got my Nebby-esque excuses locked and loaded.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
cheaptilts

- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Post
by cheaptilts » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:57 pm
Emory:
284 graduates
11 federal clerks = 3.8%
75 in biglaw = 26.4%
30.2% BL+FC [no change]
-
foregetaboutdre

- Posts: 399
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:16 am
Post
by foregetaboutdre » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:57 pm
curry1 wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:registering wrote:
I feel like it can shed like 30-60 students though.
It most certainly can. But that would require things like smart planning and sacrifice among the overpaid faculty and administration. A bridge too far I'm afraid.
nope, boomer professors deserve to make 500k per year - didn't you know that they could take their talents to firms and make 7 figures? Law schools also definitely need a million clinics and administrators in obscure areas of the law which virtually no law student will ever work in.
Great prisoners dilemma with GULC, GW, and American. You'd think GULC could secure itself as a T14 by basically not taking all the American + GW transfers it gets, and GW could move back close to a T20, and American to a T1 or whatever if the schools tried to keep their students from not transferring to another.
But the transfers bring in $$$ to the faculty.
-
cheaptilts

- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Post
by cheaptilts » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:01 pm
Howard:
136 graduates
2 fed clerks
26 in biglaw
20.5% in BL + FC [+ 3.3 gain in percentage points]
-
Stylnator

- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:26 pm
Post
by Stylnator » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:07 pm
What day will information from all schools be available?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
registering

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:41 am
Post
by registering » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:08 pm
foregetaboutdre wrote:curry1 wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:registering wrote:
I feel like it can shed like 30-60 students though.
It most certainly can. But that would require things like smart planning and sacrifice among the overpaid faculty and administration. A bridge too far I'm afraid.
nope, boomer professors deserve to make 500k per year - didn't you know that they could take their talents to firms and make 7 figures? Law schools also definitely need a million clinics and administrators in obscure areas of the law which virtually no law student will ever work in.
Great prisoners dilemma with GULC, GW, and American. You'd think GULC could secure itself as a T14 by basically not taking all the American + GW transfers it gets, and GW could move back close to a T20, and American to a T1 or whatever if the schools tried to keep their students from not transferring to another.
But the transfers bring in $$$ to the faculty.
It's just odd because a lot of the lower T14 cut class sizes slightly during the recession but GULC kept at it with the giant classes, I think hitting 700 in one year which is just ridiculous. I'm sure these schools all make money off their law schools but GULC is in a different league altogether.
If it really is that the school peaks at 300ish students into desirable outcomes, I think they can take giant transfer classes if they're smart about where they pick them from. If it looks like TTTT transfers consistently underperform, target T1 transfers more. Reduce incoming 1L matriculants instead. Just shaving 7 kids per section (and their sections are ~100 people) would get you 35 fewer students.
-
LawMan16

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:06 am
Post
by LawMan16 » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:10 pm
Stylnator wrote:What day will information from all schools be available?
The ABA typically releases an aggregated report at the end of April or early May, so should be prior to that.
-
cheaptilts

- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Post
by cheaptilts » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:11 pm
Boston College:
227 grads
3 federal clerks
87 biglaw
39.6% FC+BL [down two-ish percent]
-
favabeansoup

- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Post
by favabeansoup » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:17 pm
BigZuck wrote:Yo somebody tag me in when UT drops. I've got my Nebby-esque excuses locked and loaded.
If bad, #1) low oil prices mean lower incoming classes and it disproportionately affects UT students compared to other schools #2) large number of transfer kids distort numbers #3) idgaf b/c I still live a better life than NYC ppl
If good, UT 8===D~~~ GULC
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Nebby

- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Post
by Nebby » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:19 pm
BigZuck wrote:Yo somebody tag me in when UT drops. I've got my Nebby-esque excuses locked and loaded.
I'll wreck you
-
Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Post
by Dodocogon » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:39 pm
Dr. Nefario wrote:trebekismyhero wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
UIUC topping BU, that one is gonna sting.
Do we have BU #'s yet?
-
tuesdayninja

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm
Post
by tuesdayninja » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:43 pm
Dodocogon wrote:Dr. Nefario wrote:trebekismyhero wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
UIUC topping BU, that one is gonna sting.
Do we have BU #'s yet?
Not officially, but current BU students can access it according to Nefario. It's apparently 36%?
-
Dr. Nefario

- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Post
by Dr. Nefario » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:44 pm
Dodocogon wrote:Dr. Nefario wrote:trebekismyhero wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
UIUC topping BU, that one is gonna sting.
Do we have BU #'s yet?
only unofficial #'s I found by messing with the URL to last year's data. But if that is any indication then its 36.1%
ETA: scooped
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Post
by Dodocogon » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:46 pm
Dr. Nefario wrote:Dodocogon wrote:Dr. Nefario wrote:trebekismyhero wrote:Tiago Splitter wrote:Rigo wrote:
Dang. That's T20 numbers.
Have these numbers been independently verified?
UIUC only cheats on admissions numbers, not job numbers haha. And actually I think as part of ABA sanctions all their numbers do have to be independently verified
UIUC topping BU, that one is gonna sting.
Do we have BU #'s yet?
only unofficial #'s I found by messing with the URL to last year's data. But if that is any indication then its 36.1%
ETA: scooped
Sounds good. I was gonna ask bc messing with the URL takes me to a login page; thought students could probably get it. Good to know.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:48 pm

is that going to beat Berkekey even?
-
tuesdayninja

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm
Post
by tuesdayninja » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:53 pm
favabeansoup wrote:Vandy is up. Amazing numbers (bye GULC)
https://law.vanderbilt.edu/2016-EmploymentSummary.pdf
85 grads in 100+ firms
18 in Fed Clerks
182 total Graduates
56.59% Biglaw/Fed Clerk rate. [2015 was 47.02%, so +9.57% this year]
WOW. Best numbers from a non traditional T14 school in the past 8-9 years?
Bah gawd Vandy
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login