Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein) Forum
- nimbus cloud
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 am
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
- Po$eidon
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Legally blonde y'allnimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
- Pragmatic Gun
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
0L has a point, unless you really want to be a professor one day.nimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Lucky for you that will be an easy accomplishment.cavalier1138 wrote:This is the best advertisement for staying the hell away from HLS that I've ever seen.unpetitpacifiste wrote:Sorry I don't. I didn't assume that everyone is going to make partner. Even if you don't make partner, the salary of an eighth year associate, according to the Cravath scale, is $315,000, which still makes the $25k debt look not so significant. In addition, because we are giving advice to the OP, who seems very bright and likely to outperform his average classmates, I think it's reasonable to assume he is going to have an even more high-paying job. BTW, your attitude is not making me look bad. Can't you see that I am merely trying to help by advancing an unpopular view? if we can't have a civil conversation here, I don't know how we can blame the current toxic social media environment.cavalier1138 wrote:Do you not understand the contradictions in your own argument?unpetitpacifiste wrote:I feel like this is getting very dramatic... Just to make my points clear, I realize that making partner at BigLaw is very difficult and I also realize that having a JD from Harvard is not gonna make it any easier than having one from Chicago. I am merely saying that the debt, which looks very significant to us right now, might not look that way 10 years down the road. So I think you should think twice about rejecting a far more prestigious school for the sake of money, especially if you have political ambitions. It's no-brainer that there are far more people in positions of power who got their degree from HLS. (Just to give you an example, out of the 100 current US senators, 8 of them have a HLS JD while only 1 has a Chicago JD). For me personally, the resume boost and the extensive alumni network are worth it. Also, as an international student, there is a chance that I might go back to my home country, where a HLS JD will carry me much further.
If everyone has a very low probability of making partner, then it's fucking idiotic to make financial calculations based on what life might look like when you are a partner 10 years down the road. But stellar example of the worst possible 0L mentality towards prestige.
I will stop responding with a last message to the OP since I think I have made my point: Regardless of what you choose in the end, I think you are going to have a very bright future given your current achievements. But I will be very glad if you decide to join us at HLS, where I am sure you will be a great addition.
Never try to argue with the debt vigilantes. They don't seem to realize that good preschools in their beloved NYC cost 15K. Private k-12 40k a year. Boarding school 50k+. Any reasonable undergrad like say Fordham for instance (whose law school they scoff at) 65k. Ivy's north of that. But law school lets draw the line there. To the mattresses.
None of the op's choices are bad. Pretty much the only reason they offer these incredible honors is to talk you out of going to HYS. These are not humanitarian awards.
- BlendedUnicorn
- Posts: 9318
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:40 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Legal education hiring market's changed so much recently that I wouldn't bother with this disclaimer unless you already have a ph.dPragmatic Gun wrote:0L has a point, unless you really want to be a professor one day.nimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Pragmatic Gun
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
I don't understand what this has to do with choosing the other law schools over Harvard.shadowfax wrote:
Lucky for you that will be an easy accomplishment.
Never try to argue with the debt vigilantes. They don't seem to realize that good preschools in their beloved NYC cost 15K. Private k-12 40k a year. Boarding school 50k+. Any reasonable undergrad like say Fordham for instance (whose law school they scoff at) 65k. Ivy's north of that. But law school lets draw the line there. To the mattresses.
None of the op's choices are bad. Pretty much the only reason they offer these incredible honors is to talk you out of going to HYS. These are not humanitarian awards.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Don't try to understand it. Just ignore him and be glad you'll never have to suffer through a class with him.Pragmatic Gun wrote:I don't understand what this has to do with choosing the other law schools over Harvard.shadowfax wrote:
Lucky for you that will be an easy accomplishment.
Never try to argue with the debt vigilantes. They don't seem to realize that good preschools in their beloved NYC cost 15K. Private k-12 40k a year. Boarding school 50k+. Any reasonable undergrad like say Fordham for instance (whose law school they scoff at) 65k. Ivy's north of that. But law school lets draw the line there. To the mattresses.
None of the op's choices are bad. Pretty much the only reason they offer these incredible honors is to talk you out of going to HYS. These are not humanitarian awards.
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Some of us went to those schools. We know how much they cost. Your estimates are low.Pragmatic Gun wrote:I don't understand what this has to do with choosing the other law schools over Harvard.shadowfax wrote:
Lucky for you that will be an easy accomplishment.
Never try to argue with the debt vigilantes. They don't seem to realize that good preschools in their beloved NYC cost 15K. Private k-12 40k a year. Boarding school 50k+. Any reasonable undergrad like say Fordham for instance (whose law school they scoff at) 65k. Ivy's north of that. But law school lets draw the line there. To the mattresses.
None of the op's choices are bad. Pretty much the only reason they offer these incredible honors is to talk you out of going to HYS. These are not humanitarian awards.
We also understand money and debt and not borrowing $200,000 to get something you can obtain for significantly less or even free (as a result of your own hard work and achievements.) It literally does not compute in my brain.
If Harvard is your dream school and you want to mortgage your future for your dream, just say that. Don't try to rationalize it with some nebulous, assumed benefit to your not-even-started career.
Last edited by Npret on Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Po$eidon
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Every word of this is true. Harvard's lay prestige (and, as a result, its ego) is just so huge. It's why people take Harvard. But it's also not really deservednimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
- Pragmatic Gun
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Is it well known that Harvard is more numbers oriented while Stanford and Yale actually demands decent softs in addition to outstanding numbers?
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Generally, that is the distinction. HLS is inevitably going to be more about numbers since they have a huge class and most people, if given the opportunity, will choose Stanford and Yale over HLS.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Is it well known that Harvard is more numbers oriented while Stanford and Yale actually demands decent softs in addition to outstanding numbers?
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
+100Npret wrote: If Harvard is your dream school and you want to mortgage your future for your dream, just say that. Don't try to rationalize it with some nebulous, assumed benefit to your not-even-started career.
Look. This entire thread comes down to nothing more than the above. A shit ton of people are really hung up on the Harvard brand and it being a dream to go to HLS. If that's you -- if you decide it's valuable enough to be able feel the feeling of being a Harvard Law student, then just say so and enroll. This thread logically should have just been over at Rubenstein. If you have non-logic-based reasons for wanting H instead, then just stop fooling yourself and be done with it. It's shitty and irresponsible to others to pretend there's a good argument for choosing H in this case; it's like some "teach the controversy" evolution vs. 6,000-year-old-Earth bullshit. Stop pretending you're using your brain to make choices.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
True for Stanford not for Yale. Yale has higher numbers and a slightly less diverse student body than Harvard.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Is it well known that Harvard is more numbers oriented while Stanford and Yale actually demands decent softs in addition to outstanding numbers?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
JFC.shadowfax wrote:True for Stanford not for Yale. Yale has higher numbers and a slightly less diverse student body than Harvard.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Is it well known that Harvard is more numbers oriented while Stanford and Yale actually demands decent softs in addition to outstanding numbers?
I'm starting to think you don't actually go to Harvard, because most people I've met from that school are relatively normal.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
I don't go to Harvard I went to Harvard. And these are simply numbers that are readily verifiable from the current 509's.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
...Ted Cruz? Is this what you're doing after the failed campaign?shadowfax wrote:I don't go to Harvard I went to Harvard. And these are simply numbers that are readily verifiable from the current 509's.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
"decent softs" and "diversity" don't have to be the same thing.shadowfax wrote:True for Stanford not for Yale. Yale has higher numbers and a slightly less diverse student body than Harvard.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Is it well known that Harvard is more numbers oriented while Stanford and Yale actually demands decent softs in addition to outstanding numbers?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2017 9:31 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Sorry to revive a thread that got snarky but making basically this exact decision and don't want to start a new discussion. I didn't apply to UChicago (so looking at Harvard v. Columbia Butler v. NYU Vanderbilt). I am not at all interested in Biglaw-- I want to do a clerkship and then PI, and ultimately end up in the judiciary. If I'd be paying half sticker at Harvard, does that change the calculus?
- gargleblaster
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:05 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
Even if you were one of the 9 people with a need based fully?nimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
http://hls.harvard.edu/content/uploads/ ... Report.pdf
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
gargleblaster wrote:Even if you were one of the 9 people with a need based fully?nimbus cloud wrote:One thing that is constantly reinforced in a lot of these threads is that Harvard Law has unbelievable lay prestige. It's like a cult. There is no way its outcomes justify the price that many people are willing to pay. Replace Harvard with Generic Law School and compare its numbers with Chicago's and you will never be able to say, with a straight face, that it is worth 200k more.
I mean, Yale, maybe (and even then). But Harvard's outcomes are just not that impressive.
OP: 0L here. I would take Ruby over any possible law school option, including Harvard with the highest need-based aid.
http://hls.harvard.edu/content/uploads/ ... Report.pdf
Those people are presumably pursuing jd/phds or have some special arrangement.
- BlendedUnicorn
- Posts: 9318
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:40 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
For what it's worth, $15k/year (the ruby stipend) is probably the dollar amount id say H vs Chi is a push.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RSN
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Harvard v. Columbia (Butler) v. NYU (Vanderbilt) v. Chicago (Rubenstein)
I'd probably recommend starting your own thread and putting your financial situation prominently in your OP. That said, I'd take the Vanderbilt pretty easily in your situation, unless you have a serious problem with NYU.jt716 wrote:Sorry to revive a thread that got snarky but making basically this exact decision and don't want to start a new discussion. I didn't apply to UChicago (so looking at Harvard v. Columbia Butler v. NYU Vanderbilt). I am not at all interested in Biglaw-- I want to do a clerkship and then PI, and ultimately end up in the judiciary. If I'd be paying half sticker at Harvard, does that change the calculus?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login